Hey again,
W dniu 11.01.2021 o 07:42, Michal Sawicz pisze:
Hey,
W dniu 11.01.2021 o 01:46, Dirk Hohndel pisze:
On Jan 10, 2021, at 3:14 PM, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
wrote:
I have fixed all of the trees that are used to create the builds in
downloads/test, deleted the existing builds
Hey,
W dniu 11.01.2021 o 01:46, Dirk Hohndel pisze:
On Jan 10, 2021, at 3:14 PM, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
wrote:
I have fixed all of the trees that are used to create the builds in
downloads/test, deleted the existing builds there that had invalid version
information and triggered new
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 3:14 PM, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
> wrote:
>
> I have fixed all of the trees that are used to create the builds in
> downloads/test, deleted the existing builds there that had invalid version
> information and triggered new builds that have already started to popula
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 3:03 PM, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
> wrote:
>
> New test binaries should be ready very soon. I noticed that something went
> weird when a faulty push to master confused my build servers and need to
> restart all of those builds for the latest master.
Ugh.
Unfortun
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 1:55 PM, Peter Zaal wrote:
>
> Just a couple of answers and additions to some of the comments to make myself
> more clear.
>
>> - How many dives did I do in each country I dived?
>> Not possible, the Country is not available as a variable
>
> Ugh. This is the whole dive
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Rick Walsh wrote:
> I have just had a short play with the statistics with the latest daily
> Windows build (subsurface-4.9.10-260-gbd26d8407f28.exe) and I must say this
> looks great. It is ridiculously easy to create meaningful (and meaningless!)
> graphs of m
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 07:32, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface <
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2021, at 5:17 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface <
> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote:
>
> Right, I didn't test the App
Just a couple of answers and additions to some of the comments to make
myself more clear.
Op zo 10 jan. 2021 21:14 schreef Dirk Hohndel :
> Obviously I hope that Willem and Berthold will chime in as well, but I
> want to respond to that excellent detailed input, too :-)
>
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 7:
Obviously I hope that Willem and Berthold will chime in as well, but I want to
respond to that excellent detailed input, too :-)
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Peter Zaal via subsurface
> wrote:
>
> Warning: long mail!
Those are the best, aren't they? :-)
> I think I have a very interesting
Hi all,
Warning: long mail!
So I finally got around to do some proper testing and looking at the new
statistics module in Subsurface. I did follow the development of the on the
side in this mailing list, and it looked so nice that although being a
developer myself (but not C/C++) and usu
I need to repeat:
Given a non-significant regression relationship between two variables,
indicating any regression line at all is meaningless. In fact it is
actively misleading, making you think that there may be a relationship.
The slope of such a line has no meaning and henceforth is not use
11 matches
Mail list logo
