No problem, but before that I want to check one place I suspect can be wrong...
2015-07-07 21:33 GMT+02:00 Dirk Hohndel :
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:29:19PM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
>> I think I will check all the units once again. But it's true that it's
>> another mistake on the deepocean.ne
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:29:19PM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
> I think I will check all the units once again. But it's true that it's
> another mistake on the deepocean.net
> The real values are 0.257 N/m and 0.0179 N/m (paper by Baker confirms)
> but these constants are always (that's what I will
I think I will check all the units once again. But it's true that it's
another mistake on the deepocean.net
The real values are 0.257 N/m and 0.0179 N/m (paper by Baker confirms)
but these constants are always (that's what I will check again) in the
context like: pressure + skin_compression / radiu
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 08:41:56PM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
> Dirk, Jan,
>
> On 5 July 2015 at 23:56, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:27:23AM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Here is another pull request. I hope now it's better. Everything was
> > > reorganized fro
Dirk, Jan,
On 5 July 2015 at 23:56, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:27:23AM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Here is another pull request. I hope now it's better. Everything was
> > reorganized from scratch, the final code is almost the same.
>
> I like the patches much be
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:27:23AM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is another pull request. I hope now it's better. Everything was
> reorganized from scratch, the final code is almost the same.
I like the patches much better.
I agree with Robert that you could have squashed a couple togeth
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 07:23:12PM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
> I multiplied 7500 fsw by 0.304 (feet to metres) divided by 10 (metres salt
> water to ata) and multipled by 1.01325 (ata to bar).
> 7500 * 0.304 / 10 * 1.01353 = 231.021 bar
>
> It's close, but I think my conversion was very slightly ou
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 10:29:17AM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
> Thanks for checking it.
>
> > But then I checked the configuration parameters adopted, and there are
> > differences. I altered vpmb_config to match what was used in the Fortran
> > code.
> > critical radius of N2 was 0.6, changed to
Hi Robert,
On 4 July 2015 at 19:25, Robert C. Helling wrote:
>
>
> What I am a bit puzzled about are the „conservatism“ factors some other
> programs offer. I have no idea which parameters those affect but that is
> another thing to investigate.
>
>
> HHS Software (V-Planner/Multideco) have def
Hi,
> On 04 Jul 2015, at 00:27, Jan Darowski wrote:
>
> Here is another pull request. I hope now it's better. Everything was
> reorganized from scratch, the final code is almost the same.
I expect I have some time tonight to review those.
Best
Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signe
Hi,
> On 04 Jul 2015, at 10:29, Jan Darowski wrote:
>
> I guess I need to implement Boyle's law as soon as possible and only
> test against
> the original fortran code...
just a brief comment: Indeed testing against other code is quite essential (not
only since our software might be giving lif
Hi,
> On 04 Jul 2015, at 11:23, Rick Walsh wrote:
>
> I multiplied 7500 fsw by 0.304 (feet to metres) divided by 10 (metres salt
> water to ata) and multipled by 1.01325 (ata to bar).
> 7500 * 0.304 / 10 * 1.01353 = 231.021 bar
>
> It's close, but I think my conversion was very slightly out, a
Hi,
On 4 July 2015 at 18:29, Jan Darowski wrote:
>
> eh... from deepocean.net: "7500 fsw min = 250 bar min"
> It's not the first mistake I found there. And it seems that the author
> of existing
> c code based his implementation on this site also.
>
>
I multiplied 7500 fsw by 0.304 (feet to metr
Thanks for checking it.
> But then I checked the configuration parameters adopted, and there are
> differences. I altered vpmb_config to match what was used in the Fortran
> code.
> critical radius of N2 was 0.6, changed to 0.8 microns
> critical radius of He was 0.5, changed to 0.7 microns
> cri
Hi Jan,
On 4 July 2015 at 08:27, Jan Darowski wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is another pull request. I hope now it's better. Everything was
> reorganized from scratch, the final code is almost the same.
>
>
I tried your VPM patch set. I haven't worked through the logic of the code
or looked at individual
Hi,
Here is another pull request. I hope now it's better. Everything was
reorganized from scratch, the final code is almost the same.
The following changes since commit 5ae5aedab3b628ad04abc435ce3b06c3612d4d6c:
Add FAQ item about creating a udev rule for Cobalt under Linux
(2015-07-02 12:26:1
16 matches
Mail list logo
