Re: Better "make clean"? Or easier configuration?

2016-04-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 20 de abril de 2016 16:31:13 PDT Linus Torvalds wrote: > There's no "distclean" or similar target, but I *can* basically just do > > ccmake . > > and just hit 'c' and 'g' to (re-)configure and generate, and that does > fix the problem. Also: make rebuild_cache --

Re: Better "make clean"? Or easier configuration?

2016-04-20 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 5:35 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: >mkdir build >cd build >cmake .. > > it will fail on grantlee. I'm not sure why. I get > > CMake Error at cmake/Modules/HandleFindGrantlee.cmake:10 (find_package): > By not providing

Re: Better "make clean"? Or easier configuration?

2016-04-20 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Linus Torvalds < torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > So Fedora just upgraded their qt version today (or at least recently). > > After that, building subsurface gets me > > make[2]: *** No rule to make target > '/usr/lib64/libQt5Concurrent.so.5.5.1', needed

Better "make clean"? Or easier configuration?

2016-04-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
So Fedora just upgraded their qt version today (or at least recently). After that, building subsurface gets me make[2]: *** No rule to make target '/usr/lib64/libQt5Concurrent.so.5.5.1', needed by 'subsurface'. Stop. Oops. Ok, I'll just do "make clean". That doesn't help, same error.