Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Salvador Cuñat
El 16/09/2015 01:23, "Dirk Hohndel" escribió: > > Any volunteer to patch this EVERYWHERE? > I can do it this evening. Regards. Salva. ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Rick Walsh
On 16 Sep 2015 09:23, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote: > > >> On Sep 15, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Salvador Cuñat wrote: >> >> >> >> 2015-09-15 23:33 GMT+02:00 Salvador Cuñat : >>> >>> Good night. >>> >>> I remember that this was discussed some

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Salvador Cuñat wrote: > > > > 2015-09-15 23:33 GMT+02:00 Salvador Cuñat >: > Good night. > > I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if there >

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Rick Walsh wrote: > > > > Back then we didn't want UTF-8 in our source and so went with Buhlmann. I'd > > be happy to simply change it everywhere to Bühlmann. > > Any volunteer to patch this EVERYWHERE? > > > By *everywhere* I hope you mean

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Salvador Cuñat
2015-09-15 23:33 GMT+02:00 Salvador Cuñat : > Good night. > > I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if > there was an agreement about it. > I've finally found the thread. Seems that there was an agreement about using "Buhlmann" as it is

Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Salvador Cuñat
Good night. I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if there was an agreement about it. I've just realized we are mixing the names everywhere (there are just two occurrences in planner and they are different), mainly in user-manual. I don't known if there is a