Re: [Patch] Re-fix silly typo (was Current git no compilee)

2015-06-18 Thread Robert C. Helling
Dirk, > Am 18.06.2015 um 06:51 schrieb Dirk Hohndel : > > I hear that working in flower arrangements is rather similar to the lifestyle > of a dive master. > >> Life can be difficult that way. >> > > Agreed I'm sure you'll do great! http://youtu.be/TNV1U34p6jk Best Robert

Re: [Patch] Re-fix silly typo (was Current git no compilee)

2015-06-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > On Jun 17, 2015 02:28, "Dirk Hohndel" > wrote: > > > > I should just give up and learn to do flower arrangements. > > While I'm sure you'd do very well at flower arrangements, I suspect the money > in it i

Re: [Patch] Re-fix silly typo (was Current git no compilee)

2015-06-17 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Jun 17, 2015 02:28, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote: > > I should just give up and learn to do flower arrangements. While I'm sure you'd do very well at flower arrangements, I suspect the money in it is not enough to maintain the scuba lifestyle you are accustomed to. Life can be difficult that way.

Re: [Patch] Re-fix silly typo (was Current git no compilee)

2015-06-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:16:18PM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote: > Dirk, > > > > I compile with debugging. No idea why this didn't get me... > > > > > The problem seems to be so trivial that I couldn't even see the > > > obviousness of it at first: m_Instance vs m_instance (notice the wrong > > > capita

[Patch] Re-fix silly typo (was Current git no compilee)

2015-06-17 Thread Rick Walsh
Dirk, On 17 June 2015 at 13:31, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 05:16:16PM -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > Compiled for me... > > > I'm out at dinner. Will look tonight. > > > > I suspect you compile without debugging, so

Re: Current git no compilee

2015-06-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 20:31:01 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > I suspect you compile without debugging, so that the Q_ASSERT_X() goes > > away. > I compile with debugging. No idea why this didn't get me... You may be compiling with debugging but with QT_NO_DEBUG set. The default of QT_DEBUG / QT_NO_DEB

Re: Current git no compilee

2015-06-16 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 05:16:16PM -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > Compiled for me... > > I'm out at dinner. Will look tonight. > > I suspect you compile without debugging, so that the Q_ASSERT_X() goes away. I compile with debugging. No id

Re: Current git no compilee

2015-06-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Compiled for me... > I'm out at dinner. Will look tonight. I suspect you compile without debugging, so that the Q_ASSERT_X() goes away. The problem seems to be so trivial that I couldn't even see the obviousness of it at first: m_Instance vs

Re: Current git no compilee

2015-06-16 Thread Dirk Hohndel
Compiled for me... I'm out at dinner. Will look tonight. /D -- Sent from my phone > On Jun 16, 2015, at 18:02, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > I get this: > >/home/torvalds/src/subsurface/windowtitleupdate.cpp: In > constructor ‘WindowTitleUpdate::WindowTitleUpdate(QObject*)’: >/home/to

Current git no compilee

2015-06-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
I get this: /home/torvalds/src/subsurface/windowtitleupdate.cpp: In constructor ‘WindowTitleUpdate::WindowTitleUpdate(QObject*)’: /home/torvalds/src/subsurface/windowtitleupdate.cpp:7:13: error: ‘m_Instance’ was not declared in this scope Q_ASSERT_X(m_Instance == NULL, "WindowTitleUpdate