On 17/10/2017 22:37, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
Now about the "5bar" result from your first plot. Yes, this makes no
real sense. Root cause is that my implementation currently always does
the calculation for the last manually entered data point and this in
your case is at 22m. This is so close to
On 17/10/2017 09:53, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
Hello Willem,
Am 17.10.2017 um 09:42 schrieb Willem Ferguson:
On 16/10/2017 21:56, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
BTW: You could be one of the best candidates for testing my latest
changes around cylinder handling in the planner. It would be great
to hear
Hello Willem,
Am 17.10.2017 um 09:42 schrieb Willem Ferguson:
> On 16/10/2017 21:56, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
>>
>> BTW: You could be one of the best candidates for testing my latest
>> changes around cylinder handling in the planner. It would be great to
>> hear from your side if this improves or
On 16/10/2017 21:56, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
BTW: You could be one of the best candidates for testing my latest
changes around cylinder handling in the planner. It would be great to
hear from your side if this improves or breaks s.th. for you. Robert
merged the changes already but the PR was
Hello Willem,
please find a few comments from my side on top of your two mails from
today about this topic.
Am 16.10.2017 um 15:31 schrieb Willem Ferguson:
> Attached two images of a mixed gas dive.
>
> Plan1 is a first step of a multigas dive plan and the planner places
> some points above the
