On 19-03-15 20:10, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 03:23:28PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
On 18 March 2015 at 05:48, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
Thiago,
would Subsurface benefit from using Qt Bluetooth for our intended Bluetooth
integration?
This would cause some interesting archite
On 2015-03-19 14:23, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
On 18 March 2015 at 05:48, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
Thiago,
would Subsurface benefit from using Qt Bluetooth for our intended
Bluetooth integration?
This would cause some interesting architectural challenges with
libdivecomputer (as that most definit
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 03:23:28PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 18 March 2015 at 05:48, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >
> > Thiago,
> >
> > would Subsurface benefit from using Qt Bluetooth for our intended Bluetooth
> > integration?
> > This would cause some interesting architectural challenges w
On 18 March 2015 at 05:48, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> Thiago,
>
> would Subsurface benefit from using Qt Bluetooth for our intended Bluetooth
> integration?
> This would cause some interesting architectural challenges with
> libdivecomputer (as that most definitely doesn’t want to depend on Qt), bu
On Tuesday 17 March 2015 20:48:32 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Thiago,
>
> would Subsurface benefit from using Qt Bluetooth for our intended Bluetooth
> integration? This would cause some interesting architectural challenges
> with libdivecomputer (as that most definitely doesn’t want to depend on
> Qt),
Thiago,
would Subsurface benefit from using Qt Bluetooth for our intended Bluetooth
integration?
This would cause some interesting architectural challenges with libdivecomputer
(as that most definitely doesn’t want to depend on Qt), but I find it very
intriguing that Qt now supports all of the
