On Aug 27, 2015, at 07:17, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
I'd love to fix those. Can you point them out to me? When first setting
things up I did a few test installs in VMs and all seemed to work fine.
But I never tried to build the source rpms, to be honest.
I'm hoping
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:36:45PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:36:45PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the experience for FLOSS users will simply
be that there is no subsurface
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 06:50:20 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
And then there is Linux. 1/5th of the number of users that Windows has
(for Subsurface). Even though on Windows there are tons of alternatives
and on Linux there's nothing else. And we have all the developers here
mixed into those
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the experience for FLOSS users will simply
be that there is no subsurface anymore.
No, we have binaries available for Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE,
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 17:40:28 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
I don’t know anything about CentOS, but these days I happen to build
subsurface on Macs which only have homebrew which should be much more
basic
than any Linux distribution package manager. But here, I just have to
install a few
Lutz,
On 26 Aug 2015, at 20:10, Lutz Vieweg l...@5t9.de mailto:l...@5t9.de
wrote:
I don't know anything about copr yet, and I am kind of sure that the
way I built Subsurface for CentOS (in a freely relocateable directory
which holds everything including a script which deduces the required
libgit,... well I'm not really into the subsurface code, but I never
understood why you introduced that as a storage backend.
Even the most prolific divers I know don't have more then 30k-50k
dives, and usually these people stopped logging there day to day dives
decades ago.
Using a plain
On 08/26/2015 07:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Yesterday I endeavored to build the Subsurface git master head on CentOS,
and it was kind of a nightmare - everything, from
just-one-patchlevel-version-of-
cmake-ahead-of-what-CentOS-delivers, continuing with of course Qt 5 in a
very certain
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:33:06PM +0200, Lutz Vieweg wrote:
This thread has turned into a bitter fight over distribution policies
vs. upstream maintainer's freedom of choice, where I see valid arguments
from both sides as well too much emotion.
To contribute another view point:
I am
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 06:32:39PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:15:51AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:18:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Would you help me to get things set up so I can do this? The server all
of
my
This thread has turned into a bitter fight over distribution policies
vs. upstream maintainer's freedom of choice, where I see valid arguments
from both sides as well too much emotion.
To contribute another view point:
I am using the most recent and up-to-date CentOS release, also on the
laptop
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:18:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Would you help me to get things set up so I can do this? The server all of
my non-Mac builds run on happens to be a Ubuntu system. Is that an issue?
Can I push things into copr from Ubuntu or do I need to be on Fedora?
I
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:15:51AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:18:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Would you help me to get things set up so I can do this? The server all of
my non-Mac builds run on happens to be a Ubuntu system. Is that an issue?
Can I
On 08/26/2015 09:56 PM, Anton Lundin wrote:
There are a bunch of cmake flags to turn some bells off. Most of those
are to support different builds of subsurface, like the Android app, but
those can be (ab)used to reduce your subsurface building burden.
FBSUPPORT=OFF - no more facebook share.
On 26 August, 2015 - Lutz Vieweg wrote:
On 08/26/2015 09:56 PM, Anton Lundin wrote:
There are a bunch of cmake flags to turn some bells off. Most of those
are to support different builds of subsurface, like the Android app, but
those can be (ab)used to reduce your subsurface building burden.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:40:44PM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
i'm getting the notion that the Linux distribution maintainers are
simply buthurt for the fact that Linus Torvalds started Subsurface and
as a peace of software it now no longer obeys the Linux distribution
rules; it's setting
On 26 August 2015 at 05:38, Christoph Anton Mitterer
cales...@scientia.net wrote:
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 17:55 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
Being called stupid and arrogant is usually not a great conversation
opener, but hey, I've been called worse.
Well I should have probably immediately
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the experience for FLOSS users will simply
be that there is no subsurface anymore.
No, we have binaries available for Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE, Mint, and, of
course, Debian. And we have a fully
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 04:20:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 06:50:20AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
I looked quickly over the spec file and I call already tell that the spec
file
used would not be valid on Fedora, even more fun the source rpm
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:21:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the experience for FLOSS users will simply
be that there is no subsurface anymore.
No, we have binaries available for
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:37:01AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 04:20:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 06:50:20AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
I looked quickly over the spec file and I call already tell that the
spec file
used would
On 26 August, 2015 - Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 17:55 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
...
An application should be able to bring its own libraries for those
libraries that it is so tightly coupled with that it makes no sense
to
allow random combinations. So today
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de
wrote:
Lutz,
On 26 Aug 2015, at 20:10, Lutz Vieweg l...@5t9.de wrote:
I don't know anything about copr yet, and I am kind of sure that the
way I built Subsurface for CentOS (in a freely relocateable directory
which holds
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 17:55 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
Being called stupid and arrogant is usually not a great conversation
opener, but hey, I've been called worse.
Well I should have probably immediately apologised along the way, just
for the sake of politeness...
But the believe to know it
On 08/25/2015 05:10 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hey.
How saddening to see such a nice program for divers being basically
destroyed by a stupid and arrogant upstream (and while some may
consider this impolite, I guess it's simply the truth).
Humph. The daily PPA works fine for me on
Hey.
How saddening to see such a nice program for divers being basically
destroyed by a stupid and arrogant upstream (and while some may
consider this impolite, I guess it's simply the truth).
Especially the assumption to know it better than the rest of the whole
opensource world and decades of
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:10:06AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
How saddening to see such a nice program for divers being basically
destroyed by a stupid and arrogant upstream (and while some may
consider this impolite, I guess it's simply the truth).
You are entitled to your
29 matches
Mail list logo
