Re: Sourcecode of modified 3. party libs

2015-11-02 Thread Martin Gysel
Am 02.11.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Dirk Hohndel: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:05:38PM +0100, Martin Gysel wrote: >> Hi Dirk >> >> What do you think about archiving the modified 3rd party libs for each >> subsurface release (e.g. in a separate tar Subsurface-bundle.tgz)? >> Otherwise it's not so trivial

Re: Sourcecode of modified 3. party libs

2015-11-02 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:05:38PM +0100, Martin Gysel wrote: > Hi Dirk > > What do you think about archiving the modified 3rd party libs for each > subsurface release (e.g. in a separate tar Subsurface-bundle.tgz)? > Otherwise it's not so trivial to know what lib has been used in which > version

Sourcecode of modified 3. party libs

2015-11-02 Thread Martin Gysel
Hi Dirk What do you think about archiving the modified 3rd party libs for each subsurface release (e.g. in a separate tar Subsurface-bundle.tgz)? Otherwise it's not so trivial to know what lib has been used in which version to build the official release binary. It would also help packaging it for