On 08/06/2015 16:18, Dirk wrote:
We very much rely on the testers here on this list to take Subsurface
through its paces, to simulate your normal work flow and to help us
pinpoint the areas that we broke. I'm quite certain that there are still
a bunch of issues with the new location management code.
The lack of feedback is probably because location management is actually
a workable tool now. I cannot crash it (SHA gd9801). I have tried adding
coordinates by hand in several formats and it appears quite ok. I also
added coordinates from Marble and it looks ok. All the coordinates are
stored against the correct dives as far as I can see, no scrambling of
coordinates. Tomaz you are fantastic. I also messed around with dive
site coordinates, replacing the present dive site with another existing
dive site. All appears ok. Thanks to the work by Robert and others there
is now quite a bit of freedom in the way Subsurface accepts hand-entered
coordinates. This really helps.
I have two gripes:
1) One needs a facility to check, and if necessary, edit the coordinates
of a dive site. Once a dive site is successfully entered, there is no
way to view, rename a site or edit the coordinates or to delete the dive
site from the database. When cliking the "+" next to an existing dive
site, it does not give the info for that dive site. It gives blank form.
2) Coordinates of the form 30.67°E 27.87°S are parsed as in the northern
hemisphere. If they are entered in the form 30.67°S 27.87°E they are
parsed correctly as being in the southern hemisphere. So order is
important. I hope to do some diving a week from now and will test
coordinate upload using the companion app.
Kind regards,
willem
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
