On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
On 06 February, 2015 - Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
in terms of our current scheme for updating ssrf-version.h, with each
git HEAD change one potential small issue is present where the macros
from the file itself are used on
On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
On 06 February, 2015 - Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
in terms of our current scheme for updating ssrf-version.h, with each
git HEAD change one potential small issue is
On 06 February, 2015 - Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
hello,
in terms of our current scheme for updating ssrf-version.h, with each
git HEAD change one potential small issue is present where the macros
from the file itself are used on compile time by a number of files.
this forces recompilation
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 08:33:52PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
So I'll take a patch that uses either approach.
which approach should we pick?
Let's use functions as you proposed. But mark them as inline.
Also, Lubomir, I have asked Thiago to look at the qmake patch you sent and
he
hello,
in terms of our current scheme for updating ssrf-version.h, with each
git HEAD change one potential small issue is present where the macros
from the file itself are used on compile time by a number of files.
this forces recompilation of said files into object code even if they
effectively
