On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Mitch Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A general observation about organizational behavior:
>
> Organizations do not act coherently to nearly the same extent as
> individual humans. Individuals change their minds, act in ways
> inconsistent with their state
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 24.04.2008, at 22:56, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > you check the keep property before you set it, and do not touch it i
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 20:00 +0200, J.M. Maurer wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 16:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm building libabiword-plugins on Fedora (soon to be) 9 and I get the
> > following error. libstdc++ version is 4.3.0.
> >
> > Btw, can we update sugar-jhbui
On 24.04.2008, at 22:56, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you check the keep property before you set it, and do not touch it
>> if you
>> are not going to change it.
>
> That does in fact sound like a reasonable way to ha
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:52:52PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> I guess so, but that sounds like a pretty terrible hack. I guess I'd
> have to set a flag within CollapsedEntry upon the notify::keep
> callback, and then check for the state of that flag within the
> set_jobject method of the same cl
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you check the keep property before you set it, and do not touch it if you
> are not going to change it.
That does in fact sound like a reasonable way to handle it. It
doesn't require an extra time around "the loop".
I may not be understanding this right, but what if the CollapsedEntry, when
it got the signal, checked if it was actually going to have to change the
jobject, and if it was already kept, it would just abort? This would quash
the signal the second time around - one step more than strictly
necessary/
Hello, my name is Eben Eliason, and I have a problem...
Symptom: The keep buttons in the Journal (the stars) take 1 second or
so between being clicked and visually reflecting that change. This
is, admittedly, a rather minor problem, but as you'll see, it spells
out a larger underlying ugliness.
Add speaker device and icon by default, as in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Frame#07
---
src/hardware/hardwaremanager.py | 26 -
src/model/devices/Makefile.am |4 +-
src/model/devices/devicesmodel.py |3 +
src/model/devices/speaker.py | 59 ++
src
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:47:11PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:01:52PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > > > +return self._master.flags & gst.
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 16:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building libabiword-plugins on Fedora (soon to be) 9 and I get the
> following error. libstdc++ version is 4.3.0.
>
> Btw, can we update sugar-jhbuild to use 2.6.2? if someone can upload
> tarballs on sugar.abisource
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Peter Krenesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The sugar team has accomplished an amazing amount in the time they've
> spent so far. However, there are so many features, like security, that
> were not implemented or implemented as well as they should have been.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Martin Dengler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:01:52PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> > I'll /try/ to keep my comments mostly to the UI and leave the code
> > review for others. I'll also fail at that to some extent, since I
> > have curio
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:01:52PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> I'll /try/ to keep my comments mostly to the UI and leave the code
> review for others. I'll also fail at that to some extent, since I
> have curiosities about bits and pieces.
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Martin Dengler
> <[
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:13:19PM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> I would prefer a true ternary expression (new in 2.5):
> mute_item_text = 'Unmute' if self._model.props.muted else 'Mute'
Doh -- I forgot we're on 2.5. Of course this is the right thing to
do. Thanks.
> - --Ben
Martin
p
Hi everybody,
there will be no meeting today. Hope we can make it again next week.
Best,
Simon
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 24.04.2008, at 18:01, Eben Eliason wrote:
> >
> >> +mute_item_text = self._model.props.muted and 'Unmute' or
> >> 'Mute'
> >
> > This is a tricky ternary stand-in. Very clever. Is it clear enough
>
Albert Cahalan wrote:
> It's clear that we aren't all here for the same thing.
> Some wish to help all kids, or poor kids, or non-Western
> kids. Some wish to advance freedom of speech, freedom from
> EULA slavery, or freedom to learn heretical ideas.
>
> Some of us are, assuming good intentions, e
On 24.04.2008, at 18:01, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> +mute_item_text = self._model.props.muted and 'Unmute' or
>> 'Mute'
>
> This is a tricky ternary stand-in. Very clever. Is it clear enough
> for others?
It's an abuse of Python, IMHO.
- Bert -
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eben Eliason wrote:
|> +mute_item_text = self._model.props.muted and 'Unmute' or 'Mute'
|
| This is a tricky ternary stand-in. Very clever. Is it clear enough for
others?
If you want it on one line, I would prefer a true ternary expression
I'll /try/ to keep my comments mostly to the UI and leave the code
review for others. I'll also fail at that to some extent, since I
have curiosities about bits and pieces.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Martin Dengler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +return self._master.flags & gst.inte
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bibek Paudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:33 PM
Subject: {OLPC Nepal} Re: [FOSSNepal] Re: Report: OLPC may eventually switch
from Linux to Windows XP
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
While I pers
ncle Negroponte is
>> fool nonsense because he now hate Linux.
>>
>> About Ubuntu, i don't know how to pronounce it. Please teach me as
>> well.
>>
>> Try a survey with your friends or co-workers around. The answer
>>
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bibek Paudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:18 PM
Subject: {OLPC Nepal} Re: [FOSSNepal] Re: Report: OLPC may eventually switch
from Linux to Windows XP
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
While I pers
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Nicholas Negroponte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> For this reason, Sugar needs a wider basis, to run on more Linux platforms
>> and to run under Windows. We have been engaged in discussions with Microsoft
>> for several months, to expl
Hello,
I'm building libabiword-plugins on Fedora (soon to be) 9 and I get the
following error. libstdc++ version is 4.3.0.
Btw, can we update sugar-jhbuild to use 2.6.2? if someone can upload
tarballs on sugar.abisource.com I'll be happy to take care of jhbuild
modulesets update...
Marco
g++
Bryan Berry wrote:
> simon, thanks for your concern
>
> fixed the customized build problems. All ready for tomorrow. You guys
> should realize that about 80% of my time is taken up by logistics.
> Testing, organizing XO's, labeling them, etc. I spent 4 hours today
> packing the XO's for tomorrow.
simon, thanks for your concern
fixed the customized build problems. All ready for tomorrow. You guys
should realize that about 80% of my time is taken up by logistics.
Testing, organizing XO's, labeling them, etc. I spent 4 hours today
packing the XO's for tomorrow. ah the joy. little time left f
Bryan Berry wrote:
> Our pilots at Bishwamitra and Bashuki schools start this Friday and I
> couldn't be more excited.
This is great! Are there any blockers left on which you could use remote
help on? Did you solve the customized build issues you had?
Best,
Simon
Add speaker device and icon by default, as in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Frame#07
---
src/hardware/hardwaremanager.py | 28 +-
src/model/devices/Makefile.am |4 +-
src/model/devices/devicesmodel.py |3 +
src/model/devices/speaker.py | 59 +++
s
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Bryan Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our pilots at Bishwamitra and Bashuki schools start this Friday and I
> couldn't be more excited.
I wish I were there.
> I find this discussion about the future of OLPC frankly *annoying* and
> tiresome.
Ivan and Walter
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (sorry for cross-postings)
>
> The first release of Cerebro is out!
>
> Cerebro basically offers scalable presence information and a simple
> collaboration API. Features currently include:
>
> - presence i
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as the paragraph below is being repeated and translated in newspapers
> all around the world, and Nicholas has started sharing his opinions
> with the community, I would like to ask a clarification about what he
>
Hello,
I landed a few sugar-jhbuild changes last weekend. Highlights:
* You are better off doing a clean checkout/build.
* We are now pulling jhbuild upstream directly instead of using an
internal copy. Misc cleanups of the scripts and of the directory
structure.
* I reworked the sanity check do
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:27 AM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take two such laptops.
>
> Take them way out into the country so they can only communicate with
> each other.
>
> There are no access points. No laptop is acting as an access point, either.
>
> Can those two laptops co
Hi,
as the paragraph below is being repeated and translated in newspapers
all around the world, and Nicholas has started sharing his opinions
with the community, I would like to ask a clarification about what he
really meant with this and how we could address those concerns.
He lamented that an o
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Martin Dengler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I be submitting patches that include the Makefile.am changes?
> Or does automake magically figure that out for me somehow?
>
Nope, you have to do it manually.
Marco
__
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Morgan Collett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm running sugar-jhbuild on Ubuntu Hardy, and Tomeu's recent commit to add
> > dependency files for Ubuntu is great except for 3 packages
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running sugar-jhbuild on Ubuntu Hardy, and Tomeu's recent commit to add
> dependency files for Ubuntu is great except for 3 packages with the wrong
> names (I haven't checked Gutsy - might be the same deal there). I've
It's clear that we aren't all here for the same thing.
Some wish to help all kids, or poor kids, or non-Western
kids. Some wish to advance freedom of speech, freedom from
EULA slavery, or freedom to learn heretical ideas.
Some of us are, assuming good intentions, extremely innocent
regarding Micro
40 matches
Mail list logo
