Re: [sugar] Microsoft

2008-05-18 Thread Joel Rees
Very typical modus operandi for leviathan -- Convenient errors in the news. Convenient to leviathan, at any rate, not to the poor mucks whose work they intend to capitalize. Is someone who can claim more authority and give better information than I going to notify the NYTimes of the error?

[sugar] pyc files in activity startup time (was Re: OLPC priorities for Sugar in the August release)

2008-05-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One low-hanging fruit for faster activity start is having activity install compile .pyc files, with (tiny) extra points if the .pyc gets hints to not use jffs2 compression. Hi Chema, do you know how much this could

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do we get the patch into the rpm without actually pushing the

[sugar] Problem building sugar-base

2008-05-18 Thread Eduardo Silva
Hi, I'm trying to buld the sugar environment with sugar-jhbuild and the sugar-base package is broken: configure: creating ./config.status config.status: error: cannot find input file: Makefile.in *** error during stage configure of sugar-base: ## Error running ./autogen.sh --prefix

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Eben Eliason
Attached,with launchbox.py included. - Eben On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Eben Eliason
Sorry for the spam. This includes the necessary change to the makefile, and also fixes a few small bugs in the former versions. - Eben On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached,with launchbox.py included. - Eben On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Tomeu

Re: [sugar] sugar-jhbuild fixes

2008-05-18 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, have added automake1.9, subversion and gtk-doc-tools to the ubuntu dependencies xml file. Should be added as well to the fedora files? I tested the current sysdeps on a fresh live cd install, so the Fedora deps are

Re: [sugar] Sugar in LinuxTag 2008

2008-05-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 13 May 2008 11:57, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: some (most) members of the Sugar team is discussing having a meeting at LinuxTag in Berlin from 29th May - 1st June. For now, looks like Simon Schampijer, Jim Gettys, Marco, Bert, Bernie, Holger Levsen (from OLPC Deutschland) and me will

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Eben/Tomeu, On 18 May 2008, at 15:37, Eben Eliason wrote: Attached,with launchbox.py included. - Eben I'm trying to apply you patch directly to an Xo with joyride 1946 (I don't have access to any other build environment so my tests are limited to patching an Xo B4). The patch seems

Re: [sugar] Problem building sugar-base

2008-05-18 Thread Eduardo Silva
Hi Marco, the problem was fixed when Tomeu add the missed check dependencies automake 1.9, subversion, gtk-doc-tools, etc. thanks Ed.- P.S: Ubuntu Hardy Heron On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eduardo Silva [EMAIL

Re: [sugar] Interface Definition for Activity Writers

2008-05-18 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the 'OLPC News (2008-05-17) - Tech Team' posting, Kim writes: rebasing our builds ... by the weekend should have a build that can be tested. At this point many activities will need some work. I'm not sure what Kim

Re: [sugar] Sugar 0.82 activity proposals

2008-05-18 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
That's good enough, Bert. Thank you! Marco On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I added details to the Modules list on the wiki. Is that enough for now, or do I need to do something else? - Bert - On 18.05.2008, at 18:30, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] Problems with mesh OLPC Sur list / problemas con la malla

2008-05-18 Thread Martin Langhoff
2008/5/16 Yama Ploskonka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: original message follows El problema al que hacía referencia es que conocemos el funcionamiento de la malla en sí, lo que no hemos podido lograr es realizar una actividad colaborativa tal como se supone que debería ser. Hasta donde entiendo,