Hello,
as previously announced we have a now an upstream mailing list for Sugar
development:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/
My suggestion would be to close sugar@lists.laptop.org and have the few
distribution specific discussions in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *If* there is
full
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
as previously announced we have a now an upstream mailing list for Sugar
development:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/
My suggestion would be to close sugar@lists.laptop.org and have the few
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM, J.M. Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Greg,
Can you make a .xo file that people can download and install via the
browser on the XO?
You don't need an .xo update for this (the current Write version will
work just fine), but an libabiword RPM update. I'm not
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:03 AM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looked like Olin University was well represented by smart and
passionate individuals last week.
I would like to nominate the Olin team to work on developing user
communication channels. After all, if open source is
On 26.11.2008, at 12:07, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
[cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] because this subject is of importance to
activity authors and I know many haven't yet subscribed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please subscribe!]
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
(apologises to Marco for sending him two copies as I forgot to cc the
list on my first try)
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM
[adding iaep to cc]
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Riccardo Lucchese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(apologises to Marco for sending him two copies as I forgot to cc the
list on my first try)
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded
[cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] because this subject is of importance to
activity authors and I know many haven't yet subscribed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please subscribe!]
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22.11.2008, at 16:35, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Some
Hi Bryan,
I think you have some movement on some of these. I added some more
comments below.
* Why is 767 noticeably slower than 703?
GS - We believe that its faster than 703 but its hard to prove.
Activity launch time is one variable. Since we put up an image now, that
may seem slower but
greg wrote:
Hi Bryan,
...
* 767 seems to enforce rainbow more strictly than 703. This has given
me major headaches when trying to make our new flash-based activities
run properly on 767.
GS - I think you submitted the details. Did you get an answer? I believe
that
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Riccardo Lucchese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is `zero olpc contractors working full time on Sugar' ?
Sorry about the lack of clarity, I somehow assumed everyone knew about this
There was just a discussion on IRC about this, and I wanted to put some of
the clarifications from there up here on the mailing list:
[07:59] dsd_ my 2 immediate concerns were: are contracts ending, and is
olpc ditching sugar
[07:59] dsd_ sounds like no for both, which is reassuring
[07:59]
Greg Smith wrote:
* 767 won't connect via WEP to an AP
GS - Should be possible. Which AP do you have? I think you have
documented your stuff so RTFM to your web site works.
Dan, Are you out there? If Bryan gets the AP info and config details,
can you buy one and try to reproduce/debug
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Riccardo Lucchese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is `zero olpc contractors working full time on Sugar' ?
Sorry about the lack of clarity, I somehow assumed everyone knew about this
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
This ends up being an excellent division of responsibility. OLPC can
focus their resources more heavily on specific deployment issues.
Sugar Labs can take a more innovative and upstream footing.
For the record, I agree
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* 767 can't connect to ejabberd on XS 0.4 because they use incompatible
versions of GNU TLS.
H. All the XO 8.2 testing has been done againstXS 0.4 so categorically
we can assert: vanilla 767 interoperates with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sugar-emulator
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/sugar-emulator, line 22, in module
from emulator import main
File /usr/share/sugar/shell/emulator.py, line 31, in module
from sugar import env
ImportError: No module named sugar
--
Silent Thunder
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 17:07, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sugar-emulator
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/sugar-emulator, line 22, in module
from emulator import main
File /usr/share/sugar/shell/emulator.py, line 31, in module
from
Hello everyone,
I haven't received much feedback on this so we're going
with DejaVu-Sans for Arabic.
I've setup a section on the Write wiki where people can fill in the best
font for their Language.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Write#Description_.26_Goals
Look in the section under
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Luke Faraone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 17:07, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sugar-emulator
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/sugar-emulator, line 22, in module
from emulator import main
Folks,
OLPC remains incredibly excited by Sugar and looks forward to a long and
productive working relationship with all the other people who share this
excitement. Look for a joint statement sometime next week on the new
ideas we developed at SugarCamp for strengthening Sugar, SugarLabs, and
our
On Nov 27, 2008, at 2:17 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
OLPC remains incredibly excited by Sugar and looks forward to a long
and
productive working relationship with all the other people who share
this
excitement.
Earlier this year, Nicholas informed both Walter and me that his plan
was to
I have had no trouble connecting both 767 and 656 to the XS .4 that
anna is running.
We have tested all sorts of activities using collaboration via the .4
XS.
On Nov 26, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Greg Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* 767
Were you able to register properly w/ XS and were you able to connect to
ejabberd?
The best way to check is to run $ olpc-netstatus from the terminal
You should see gabble listed and not salut
If you only see salut you are not connected to ejabberd
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:33 -0800, Robert
Bryan,
As you requested I ran $ olpc-netstatus and get gabble returned as
one of the values.
/Robert H.
On Nov 26, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Bryan Berry wrote:
Were you able to register properly w/ XS and were you able to
connect to
ejabberd?
The best way to check is to run $
Please let's avoid speculations until the joint statement is published.
Thanks,
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have had no trouble connecting both 767 and 656 to the XS .4 that anna is
running.
We have tested all sorts of activities using collaboration via the .4 XS.
On Nov 26, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I haven't received much feedback on this so we're going
with DejaVu-Sans for Arabic.
I recommend KACST Book.
I've setup a section on the Write wiki where people can fill in the best
font
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest you approach Chuck Kane at OLPC directly. If for some reason
he cannot accommodate the request, then we should discuss alternative
means to deploy Sugar.
-walter
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Yamandu
29 matches
Mail list logo
