Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Anyhow, speaking as someone who has only very recently gotten involved > | with the project, I can say that the Sugar interface was one of the > | most appealing things to me. I'm sure there are other potential

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-14 Thread Walter Bender
Adding Mako to the thread, as I recall he is a big ion fan as well. -walter On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > | Anyhow, speaking as someone who has only very re

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-16 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Martin Langhoff > > > Personally, I have been dreaming of a mix between ion3 and Sugar's > > > 4-zoom-stages. Talking with some hard-core ion3 friends, they seemed > > > to be co

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Martin Langhoff > > > > > Personally, I have been dreaming of a mix between ion3 and Sugar's > > >

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-16 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Martin Langhoff > > > > > Personally, I have been dreaming of a mix between ion3 and Sugar's > > >

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-16 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the goal exactly? I can only spot two real differences from > how the Sugar shell currently works: ... > Is there anything I'm missing? Is the point to be able to run desktop > applications? Yes. A Sugar

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
2008/4/22 Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ion also has an quite difficult upstream author. > > I'd suggest you look into awesome, see http://awesome.naquadah.org/ Looks nice. Trade difficult author for bad-choice-of-name? ;-) cheers, m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-22 Thread Benj. Mako Hill
> Adding Mako to the thread, as I recall he is a big ion fan as well. Absolutely. > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Martin Langhoff > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > | Anyhow, speaking as someone

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-22 Thread Benj. Mako Hill
> Is there anything I'm missing? Is the point to be able to run desktop > applications? Ion has the ability to launch different types of workspaces. There are three by default (although we could add to that). One of these is a floating workspace. It's rather bad, but it works, and I think it woul

Re: [sugar] [Server-devel] sugar roadmap

2008-04-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Wednesday 16 April 2008 16:47, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > Ion has the ability to launch different types of workspaces. There are > three by default (although we could add to that). One of these is a > floating workspace. It's rather bad, but it works, and I think it would > be pretty cool to