I'd like to present a few areas where sugar can play nice with
others, including:
* replacing the matchbox window manager, to provide better
multiple-window support for legacy apps (think of the 'gimp', running
as multiple windows without one full-screen activity area aka
virtual desktop)
*
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* making sugar behave well when run in non-full-screen-mode under
metacity. This includes refactoring home/friends/mesh view as
operations on root window, so they make sense in a multiwindow setup.
(It's been
can we stop referring to anything non-sugary as a legacy app.
i'd submit that we all use dozens of such apps every day, most
of which are in no danger of going away anytime soon. :-)
how about referring to them as existing X11 apps.
paul
c. scott ananian wrote:
I'd like to present a few
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can we stop referring to anything non-sugary as a legacy app.
i'd submit that we all use dozens of such apps every day, most
of which are in no danger of going away anytime soon. :-)
I'm using standard desktop applications :)
Marco
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can we stop referring to anything non-sugary as a legacy app.
i'd submit that we all use dozens of such apps every day, most
of which are in no danger of
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 03:07:58PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I'd like to present a few areas where sugar can play nice with
others, including:
* replacing the matchbox window manager, to provide better
multiple-window support for legacy apps (think of the 'gimp', running
as multiple
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from the window manager stuff - something I will probably be
working on is support for standard .desktop files - which are used to
generate the main menu entries in standard desktops. Any .desktop file
installed
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:45 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we could also investigate the use of the xdg utilities for
managing mimetype associations and installing activities?
Good point. I've
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way it's done right now is to copy mime information to ~/.local at
installation time.
I know. I personally don't like requiring an installation step, and
I think it might be easier to keep the random bits of XDG
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:56 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way it's done right now is to copy mime information to ~/.local at
installation time.
I know. I personally don't like requiring an
10 matches
Mail list logo
