Re: [sugar] Drop activity launch limitation?

2008-07-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has been completed). It seem to be that this is obsoleted by the new launch

Re: [sugar] Drop activity launch limitation?

2008-07-14 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has

Re: [sugar] Drop activity launch limitation?

2008-07-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I'm unsatisfied, too. Perhaps we can shorten the interval, but better than that we should be actively attempting to detect failure (how can we do this?) so that when a launch fails hard for some reason, we can

[sugar] Drop activity launch limitation?

2008-07-13 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has been completed). It seem to be that this is obsoleted by the new launch feedback. Should we drop it? My opinion - yes, you should. But I've encountered a more

Re: [sugar] Drop activity launch limitation?

2008-07-13 Thread Eben Eliason
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has been completed). It seem to be that this is obsoleted by the new launch feedback. Should