On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same
type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has been
completed). It seem to be that this is obsoleted by the new launch
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same
type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm unsatisfied, too. Perhaps we can shorten the interval, but
better than that we should be actively attempting to detect failure
(how can we do this?) so that when a launch fails hard for some
reason, we can
we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same
type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has been
completed). It seem to be that this is obsoleted by the new launch
feedback. Should we drop it?
My opinion - yes, you should.
But I've encountered a more
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same
type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has been
completed). It seem to be that this is obsoleted by the new launch
feedback. Should
5 matches
Mail list logo