Re: [sugar] Gmail Activity

2008-09-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have finally gotten around to recreating the Gmail activity based on Browse-96. There is almost no resemblance to the original gmail activity, which was based on the old web activity. So

Re: [sugar] Gmail Activity

2008-09-10 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wasn't there a Pippy example that used hulahop.WebActivity? I recall we'd talked about making these be Pippy examples. Not sure, but it can't be hulahop.WebActivity because that doesn't exist yet :) It might use the

Re: [sugar] Gmail Activity

2008-09-10 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Woa, didn't expect the web activity to have changed *that* much. Marco On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A diff would be better I think. FYI, I ran git diff and generated a 3000+ line patch. Not very useful in light of the 10 lines of code I changed in

[sugar] Gmail Activity

2008-09-09 Thread Walter Bender
I have finally gotten around to recreating the Gmail activity based on Browse-96. There is almost no resemblance to the original gmail activity, which was based on the old web activity. So the question is, do I try to make a giant patch, or just start from scratch? -walter diff -u

Re: [sugar] Gmail Activity

2008-09-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have finally gotten around to recreating the Gmail activity based on Browse-96. There is almost no resemblance to the original gmail activity, which was based on the old web activity. So the question is, do I try to

Re: [sugar] Gmail Activity

2008-09-09 Thread Walter Bender
Wasn't there a Pippy example that used hulahop.WebActivity? I recall we'd talked about making these be Pippy examples. -walter On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have finally