On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, using a private connection to the system bus and closing it after
forking fixed these issues.
Updated patch at 90445f01b30f9c29b23ba895ec84e9e69e6eaf66 in:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/3/5 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1 Fix async D-Bus methods. I'm quite lost on this. Calls made or
processed asynchronously won't return to the client. The call is
received correctly by the service, and the
Tomeu,
Yes, using a private connection to the system bus and closing it after
forking fixed these issues.
Updated patch at 90445f01b30f9c29b23ba895ec84e9e69e6eaf66 in:
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/tomeu/security
So we are one step closer.
Please update the rainbow RPMs in the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomeu,
Yes, using a private connection to the system bus and closing it after
forking fixed these issues.
Updated patch at 90445f01b30f9c29b23ba895ec84e9e69e6eaf66 in:
Hi Tomeu,
Oops, had the rpm ready when I realized that it wouldn't work as-is
because the rainbow daemon needs to have permissions to connect to
olpc's X display in order to initialize gtk and all the modules
that depend on it. During testing I've been just running xhost +
2008/3/5 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1 Fix async D-Bus methods. I'm quite lost on this. Calls made or
processed asynchronously won't return to the client. The call is
received correctly by the service, and the server-side callback is
called. But the client never gets a reply. This is
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
I think having something working will be the only thing
that motivates resourcing any security work that's needed alongside
it.
+1.
Ok, I realize how important this is,
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen the ticket, but my suggestion is to please do work on
prefork.
Here it is: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2276
Tomeu
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
Hi,
From today's meeting:
tomeu the point is that I don't know if I should devote time to
the prefork thing
tomeu I remember that m_stone said in some ticket that some changes
would need to be done in the kernel so security is not
compromised by that
I haven't seen
On Mar 4, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
I think having something working will be the only thing
that motivates resourcing any security work that's needed alongside
it.
+1.
--
Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://radian.org
___
Sugar
10 matches
Mail list logo