Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, using a private connection to the system bus and closing it after forking fixed these issues. Updated patch at 90445f01b30f9c29b23ba895ec84e9e69e6eaf66 in:

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/3/5 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1 Fix async D-Bus methods. I'm quite lost on this. Calls made or processed asynchronously won't return to the client. The call is received correctly by the service, and the

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-13 Thread Michael Stone
Tomeu, Yes, using a private connection to the system bus and closing it after forking fixed these issues. Updated patch at 90445f01b30f9c29b23ba895ec84e9e69e6eaf66 in: http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/tomeu/security So we are one step closer. Please update the rainbow RPMs in the

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomeu, Yes, using a private connection to the system bus and closing it after forking fixed these issues. Updated patch at 90445f01b30f9c29b23ba895ec84e9e69e6eaf66 in:

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-13 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Tomeu, Oops, had the rpm ready when I realized that it wouldn't work as-is because the rainbow daemon needs to have permissions to connect to olpc's X display in order to initialize gtk and all the modules that depend on it. During testing I've been just running xhost +

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2008/3/5 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1 Fix async D-Bus methods. I'm quite lost on this. Calls made or processed asynchronously won't return to the client. The call is received correctly by the service, and the server-side callback is called. But the client never gets a reply. This is

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 4, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Chris Ball wrote: I think having something working will be the only thing that motivates resourcing any security work that's needed alongside it. +1. Ok, I realize how important this is,

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't seen the ticket, but my suggestion is to please do work on prefork. Here it is: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2276 Tomeu ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org

[sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-04 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, From today's meeting: tomeu the point is that I don't know if I should devote time to the prefork thing tomeu I remember that m_stone said in some ticket that some changes would need to be done in the kernel so security is not compromised by that I haven't seen

Re: [sugar] Speeding up activity launches.

2008-03-04 Thread Ivan Krstić
On Mar 4, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Chris Ball wrote: I think having something working will be the only thing that motivates resourcing any security work that's needed alongside it. +1. -- Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://radian.org ___ Sugar