On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) I made a new one, but then left it in my computer at home!
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Caroline Meeks
I posted my notes from the visit to Fenway today:
http://schoolkey.net/blog/2008/10/08/first-meeting-with-future-engineers-at-fenway-high-school
Very exciting, thanks for
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) I made a new one, but then left it in my computer at home! I did
bring
my XO and everyone liked it of course.
I posted my notes
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Caroline Meeks I posted my
notes from the visit to Fenway today:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to hear everyone thoughts about this but personally I
wouldn't mind at all to have them open tickets about the problems they
find with the software. Less specific feedback like impressions or
feature requests
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) I made a new one, but then left it in my computer at home! I did bring
my XO and everyone liked it of course.
I posted my notes from the visit to Fenway today:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just downloaded. Will burn a CD shortly and test on the machines I have here
before I leave for the weekend. I'll be back Tuesday.
What is the process of going from a CD to a USB?
Right now I think the only way is to run
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feedback on
http://www.sugarlabs.org/~marco/sugar-livecd-1marco.iso
Wow! It runs on my 128 MB RAM Pentium II!
I don't have a duplicate of the Shaw 256MB computers but clearly this is a
great sign.
One odd thing to
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i _really_ think we need to make the XO base _and_ sugar be a
place that developers are comfortable living in. our needs
aren't quite the same as a school kid's, but i think there's a
much bigger overlap than we often think. with the
Maybe you could rephrase you call for a show of hands: raise your left
hand if you regularly use Sugar on an XO; raise your right hand if you
use regularly Sugar on other hardware. Clap your hands if you use
Sugar more than a standard WM.
Now listen to the sound of one hand clapping (the right
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
To get developers eating dog food with the XO you would need the
following:
1.) The Develop activity completed so it is usable for writing code
...
2.) An IMAP client Activity and corresponding IMAP server on a school
...
actually, i don't think
Here are a few more details:
We tried a Fedora 9 LiveCD also and it never fully booted.
The TinyLinux we used was Puppy Linux. It was remarkably faster then Fedora
and Ubuntu.
My notes and a link to Walter's notes are here:
http://schoolkey.net/blog/2008/10/04/sugar-pups
Thanks,
Caroline
On
Sebastian has already built a slimmer version of the Fedora/Sugar Live
spin, and is working on getting it integrated into a Windows-based
installer. Sugar is intended to be a first-class citizen starting with F10.
--g
Is there a LiveCD version I can try?
Thanks
--
Caroline Meeks
Thanks,
I'm specifically looking for light-weight install that has a chance of
working on older machines and 256MB Ram.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Sebastian Dziallas [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Caroline Meeks wrote:
Sebastian has already built a slimmer version of the Fedora/Sugar
Hi,
I wanted to check in on how its going. I am going to the Fenway High School
today to talk to the Future Engineers club. They are going to be helping
to test USB based operating systems for students. My plan for today is to
talk to them and see what their interstest are. I have met with
You bring up a good point. It would be good if the developers used
XO and Sugar. We would see more progress in software efficiency
amongst other things. I use Sugar most of the time as a G1G1 user
when I am home and testing the latest bits. I do have Ubuntu on an
SD card but rarely
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 07:45:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You bring up a good point. It would be good if the developers used
XO and Sugar.
[...]
To get developers eating dog food with the XO you would need the
following:
[...]
Caroline Meeks wrote:
Sebastian has already built a slimmer version of the Fedora/Sugar
Live spin, and is working on getting it integrated into a
Windows-based installer. Sugar is intended to be a first-class
citizen starting with F10.
--g
Is there a LiveCD
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing the Sugar list.
It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
spins is footprint. Even a standard Ubuntu without Sugar was seeming
too fat to load from a LiveCD on a Pentium 4 with 256K of
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing the Sugar list.
It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
spins is footprint. Even a standard Ubuntu without
marco pesenti gritti wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing the Sugar list.
and adding devel.
It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
spins is footprint. Even a standard Ubuntu without Sugar was seeming
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:02:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
marco pesenti gritti wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing the Sugar list.
and adding devel.
It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 07:45:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You bring up a good point. It would be good if the developers used
XO and Sugar.
[...]
To get developers eating dog food with the XO you would need the
following:
[...]
2.) An IMAP client Activity and corresponding IMAP
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 18:37, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing the Sugar list.
It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
spins is footprint. Even a standard Ubuntu without Sugar was seeming
too fat to load
CCing the Sugar list.
It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
spins is footprint. Even a standard Ubuntu without Sugar was seeming
too fat to load from a LiveCD on a Pentium 4 with 256K of DRAM.
Although we didn't try it, I expect Fedora would present similar
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing the Sugar list.
It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
spins is footprint. Even a standard Ubuntu without Sugar was seeming
too fat to load from a LiveCD on a Pentium 4 with 256K of
26 matches
Mail list logo
