On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We know from experience that users do not know how to interpret the
>> certificate warning, and simply learn to click on the button that allows
>> them to continue. Presenting them with an incomprehensible warning, and
>> t
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eben Eliason wrote:
> | On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritt
Here is a good explanation of how this is handled in Firefox 3.0
(different from both Eben and Benjamin proposal):
http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2008/05/06/635/
Marco
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eben Eliason wrote:
| On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
|>> * Browser bookmarks and autocompletion. - priority 3
|> I'd really like to see
We probably found a way to just hook up the firefox dialogs, there are
some missing bits but it will probably be easier than writing our own
certificate manager.
You can try it out manually btw by opening this url in a *separate*
browser instance:
chrome://pippki/content/exceptionDialog.xul
Marc
There is a good chance that this is not be possible without patching
xulrunner, which would make me **really** nervous. What you are
describing is the old firefox UI, and I *think* they took out the
hooks to do that in xulrunner 1.9.
Michael, is the target for this feature only G1G1?
I think Peru
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> * Browser bookmarks and autocompletion. - priority 3
>
> I'd really like to see some progress on #542/#5534 (deal with
> non-standard SSL certificate
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> * Browser bookmarks and autocompletion. - priority 3
I'd really like to see some progress on #542/#5534 (deal with
non-standard SSL certificate authorities). This is going to become a
bigger and bigger stumbling block the long
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:28:25AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:53:37PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Alas, two m
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I was probably wrong to bring up the Record bug in this thread.
>> However, the Browse bugs seem to be related to unsupported features in
>> the
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I was probably wrong to bring up the Record bug in this thread.
> However, the Browse bugs seem to be related to unsupported features in
> the browser--e.g., the need for some daughter windows to appear.
> Feature or bug
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:53:37PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Alas, two more open bugs that should be considered by someone:
>> >
>> > (1) Reco
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 14:33 -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos a
écrit :
> Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
> > Search queries will return a {Buddy,Activity}View object. This object
> > will have a Get{Buddies,Activities} method to retrieve the result of the
> > search, a "Changed" (or Added/Removed) s
So I was probably wrong to bring up the Record bug in this thread.
However, the Browse bugs seem to be related to unsupported features in
the browser--e.g., the need for some daughter windows to appear.
Feature or bug--not obvious.
-walter
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EM
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
> Search queries will return a {Buddy,Activity}View object. This object
> will have a Get{Buddies,Activities} method to retrieve the result of the
> search, a "Changed" (or Added/Removed) signal to track changes and a
> Closed method when user is not interested anymore by
It is proving hard for me to get consensus on the new bundle format, but I
hope that I can do so soon enough to get some forward-compatibility patches
in. Right now, I think that that would be:
allow tar as well as zip bundles (though zip bundles would remain the norm
for now)
allow multiple instal
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> The feature (and strings) freeze is approaching very quickly. We have
>> 17 days left. Can we make a quick list of things that we need to get
>> in by
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> The feature (and strings) freeze is approaching very quickly. We have
> 17 days left. Can we make a quick list of things that we need to get
> in by the 20 June?
>
This is a feature freeze, not a bugfix/patch freeze, correct?
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:53:37PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alas, two more open bugs that should be considered by someone:
> >
> > (1) Record has been broken in Joyride for quite some time: ever since
> > the introduct
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a more interesting note, it would be really fantastic to store some
> additional metadata in addition to the URL for future use. (See
> wiki.laptop.org/go/Browse). For instance, it would be nice to, map
Sorry. More s
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The feature (and strings) freeze is approaching very quickly. We have
>> 17 days left. Can we make a quick list of things that we need to g
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Guillaume Desmottes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 12:11 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti a écrit :
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Morgan Collett
>> What happens if we land only the backend without the search features?
>> Do we only see a random
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> * Improve the object chooser:
>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/D
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Improve the object chooser:
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Object_Chooser
>
> Priority 3.
I think this is much higher on the list.
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 12:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti a écrit :
> > For now I'm focusing on PS API. If someone wants to work on the GUI side
> > when they are done that would be great.
>
> What kind of API are you planning for the PS? Trying to understand how
> much work it will be to hook it
It is definitely tied to something that is different between the
Joyride and the update.1 streams. It still works in 703...
-walter
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alas, two more
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alas, two more open bugs that should be considered by someone:
>
> (1) Record has been broken in Joyride for quite some time: ever since
> the introduction of compositing? (#6850)
Joyride has no composite enabled, so this s
Alas, two more open bugs that should be considered by someone:
(1) Record has been broken in Joyride for quite some time: ever since
the introduction of compositing? (#6850)
(2) Browse has some issues that are important to Uruguay (#6825, 6826, #7078)
-walter
_
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What happens if we land only the backend without the search features?
>> Do we only see a random number of buddies?
>
> Yes, if sugar request these buddies (shouldn't be more complicated than
> a D-Bus method call on
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 12:11 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Morgan Collett
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gadget is a server side component for the jabber server that will
> > address the scalability issues by showing presence for only a subset
> > of th
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Morgan Collett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gadget is a server side component for the jabber server that will
> address the scalability issues by showing presence for only a subset
> of those on the server. It will therefore allow many more on the
> server at once.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The feature (and strings) freeze is approaching very quickly. We have
> 17 days left. Can we make a quick list of things that we need to get
> in by the 20 June?
>
> Let me start it. Priorities goes from 0 to 5.
>
>
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Presence scalability when using Jabber (gadget).
>>>
>>> Priority 2.
>>
>> Sure about this? Usefulness of presence is very limited witho
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Priority 2. I would love to have it but it might be too late, given
>> that Sayamindu experimentation run into interesting problems.
>
> A nice thing about this is that little changes to sugar are expected
> to be needed, s
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Three more items I can think of:
>
> My take on the priorities.
>
>> * Switch from Matchbox to Metacity and
>
> Priority 2. I would l
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Three more items I can think of:
>
> My take on the priorities.
>
>> * Switch from Matchbox to Metacity and
>
> Priority 2. I would love to
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Three more items I can think of:
My take on the priorities.
> * Switch from Matchbox to Metacity and
Priority 2. I would love to have it but it might be too late, given
that Sayamindu experimentation run into interesting
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The feature (and strings) freeze is approaching very quickly. We have
> 17 days left. Can we make a quick list of things that we need to get
> in by the 20 June?
>
> Let me start it. Priorities goes from 0 to 5.
>
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
