[Sugar-devel] addons.mozilla.org - what needs to be done?

2009-01-26 Thread Mel Chua
(ccing the dev list at Wade's request) Hiya, Tomeu - Wade said I should ask you what infrastructure work needs to be done to get addons.mozilla.org up and running. Could you point me towards logins/servers/existing work/trac tickets and help me get started? This afternoon was the first I'd hea

[Sugar-devel] Authentication in trac

2009-01-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Ciao, following an enlightening tip from Noah, I finally got around to make trac keep us authenticated longer than one day. Let me know if it seems to work. I made a second attempt at installing a new version of the OpenID plugin, but I still couldn't get it to work sanely, so I disabled it agai

Re: [Sugar-devel] status of OLPC project

2009-01-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Bernie Innocenti wrote: > [cc += sugar-de...@] > > Victor Lazzarini wrote: >> Thanks. Walter has kindly replied to me already, so it >> looks like sugar labs is my destination. Hope to be able to >> clear up all my marking by the end of next week and by >> then I think will also know where I actua

Re: [Sugar-devel] status of OLPC project

2009-01-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
[cc += sugar-de...@] Victor Lazzarini wrote: > Thanks. Walter has kindly replied to me already, so it > looks like sugar labs is my destination. Hope to be able to > clear up all my marking by the end of next week and by > then I think will also know where I actually fit into this > new scheme of

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: >> I have a developer who has been unable to push to Gitorious using his SSH >> key. It was working two weeks ago, then suddenly stopped. >> We have sent emails to Bernie but have not gotten any real attention to

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Wade Brainerd
Ok, I forwarded the thread on to all suggested lists. Hopefully it will be resolved soon. -Wade On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > > I have a developer who has been unable to push to Gitorious using his SSH > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-26 Thread Wade Brainerd
Awesome, thank you Brian for stepping up! Is something additional required in order to make sure the activity runs properly in SoaS or jhbuild? -Wade On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Brian Jordan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Simon Schampijer > wrote: > > Simon Schampijer wrote: >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [olpc-nz] Hints for a Sugar dev intro?

2009-01-26 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > I've been doing my best to collect information on getting started here. > http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/Resources > > Note that it's focused on activity development. This looks pretty good, Wade. Thanks for putting it together! I don

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > I have a developer who has been unable to push to Gitorious using his SSH > key. It was working two weeks ago, then suddenly stopped. > We have sent emails to Bernie but have not gotten any real attention to the > issue. Can there be a mail

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-26 Thread Brian Jordan
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the Sucrose package of Pippy is version 25 - when I last released it >> back in August. Since then there has been some development going into >> Pippy (now version 30) >> http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=pro

Re: [Sugar-devel] [olpc-nz] Hints for a Sugar dev intro?

2009-01-26 Thread Gabriel Eirea
We are planning a Documentation Jam in Uruguay for late February. I think Wade's page is an excellent starting point but we want to do it in Spanish and to write it from our own experience. Many of us started almost from scratch and we want to reflect on the learning curve and get to the essentials

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Luke Faraone
Oops, I meant @lists.sugarlabs.org :) Sj, we discuss some private security issues on this list, it's our current analog to sysad...@l.o with RT. -LF On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:42, Wade Brainerd wrote: Thanks for the information, Luke. Note that this is an issue with Sugar Labs' Gitorious, no

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Wade Brainerd
Thanks for the information, Luke. Note that this is an issue with Sugar Labs' Gitorious, not dev.laptop.org. If the problem persists though, we might have to switch development *back* to d.l.o temporarily :) -Wade On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Samuel Klein wrote: > who has access to that l

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Samuel Klein
who has access to that list? can we have a public infrastructure discussion list for issues such as this one? --SJ On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Luke Faraone wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: >> >> I have a developer who has been unable to push to Gitorious us

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Luke Faraone
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > I have a developer who has been unable to push to Gitorious using his SSH > key. It was working two weeks ago, then suddenly stopped. > We have sent emails to Bernie but have not gotten any real attention to the > issue. Can there be a ma

[Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Wade Brainerd
I have a developer who has been unable to push to Gitorious using his SSH key. It was working two weeks ago, then suddenly stopped. We have sent emails to Bernie but have not gotten any real attention to the issue. Can there be a mailing list for infrastructure support requests? We have tried eve

Re: [Sugar-devel] [olpc-nz] Hints for a Sugar dev intro?

2009-01-26 Thread Wade Brainerd
I've been doing my best to collect information on getting started here. http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/Resources Note that it's focused on activity development. -Wade On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > The Wellington Testers team has been asking me for an intro to >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Call Activity

2009-01-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 18:58, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote: > Hello Guys! > > How can i call an activity from shell ? You can see here how the shell resumes or starts an activity: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/blobs/master/src/jarabe/desktop/favoritesview.py#line528

Re: [Sugar-devel] squeak in debian

2009-01-26 Thread Luke Faraone
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:48 AM, David Farning wrote: > Is it squeak and etoys that we are missing from debian? > > They now seem to be available in lenny. > > http://packages.debian.org/lenny/etoys Etoys is in the "non-free" component. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc _

[Sugar-devel] squeak in debian

2009-01-26 Thread David Farning
Is it squeak and etoys that we are missing from debian? They now seem to be available in lenny. http://packages.debian.org/lenny/etoys http://packages.debian.org/lenny/squeak-vm david ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://