[Sugar-devel] [Invitation] Wiki Team @ Mon Mar 30 1pm – 2pm (sugar-de...@lists.suga rlabs.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20090330T17Z DTEND:20090330T18Z DTSTAMP:20090325T065753Z ORGANIZER:mailto:6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rn...@group.calendar.google.com UID:734pi6adnpcnprsc9rhhgvd...@

[Sugar-devel] [Announce] Sugar Labs wiki team 2009 launch meeting 30 March 2009 17:00 UTC (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)

Dave Farning has asked that we hold an irc chat meeting to organize a 2009 roadmap for the Sugar Labs wiki team. Please see http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Meetings and enter your ideas for the agenda or http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Roadmap. Then, at 17:00 UTC (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PD

[Sugar-devel] ideal flash activity to be remade as karma activity

http://hg.olenepal.org/6_Maths_CoOrdinates_22_swf/ Subzero, I think this might be a great flash activity to redo for Karma. Let me know if you have trouble running it on your regular machine. It is in Nepali but I think you will be able to figure it out. I really like how it demonstrates the conce

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-03-24

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > ===Sugar Digest === > > I have been buried in meetings over the past few days, so I am a bit > late in giving an update to the Sugar community. > > First, I want to wish Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero (dirakx) a rapid recovery. > > While I hav

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC Proposal

Hi, The proposal has been updated with the timeline also. Please have a look and comment on the same at : http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Educational_Toolkit in the 2009 GSoC Applications category. Thanks, Deepank http://deepank.blogspot.com On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Deepank Gupta wrote: >

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-03-24

===Sugar Digest === I have been buried in meetings over the past few days, so I am a bit late in giving an update to the Sugar community. First, I want to wish Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero (dirakx) a rapid recovery. While I have been distracted, lots of great work has been happening: the Sugar

[Sugar-devel] aslo

activities-testing has been rebased from the upstream svn. The security on activities.sl.o has also been tightened. Please ping me if anything broke. david ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo

Re: [Sugar-devel] jhbuild hangs

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 06:05:28PM -0600, Jameson Quinn wrote: It seems you are missing some undeclared dependencies. There should be no undeclared dependencies. If you find any, please file a bug against sugar-jhbuild on dev.sugarlabs.org. Try adding libpopt-dev, zip, unzip, python-gnome2,

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] do not try to build appliance if live iso build failed

For SoaS: set -e is just "exit on error" which I think is the sane thing to do in any shell script. --- build |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/build b/build index ddde4aa..c99a9dc 100755 --- a/build +++ b/build @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@ #!/bin/bash +set -e +

Re: [Sugar-devel] jhbuild hangs

It seems you are missing some undeclared dependencies. Try adding libpopt-dev, zip, unzip, python-gnome2, python-gnome2-desktop; I found these in an old version of the jhbuild page, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Development_Team/Jhbuild&oldid=21330#Dealing_with_dependencies Jameson On

Re: [Sugar-devel] jhbuild hangs

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:56:08PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: Manual kill. OK. Thanks. I didn't know where to start. So is it the gconf problem? I have the Ubuntu gconf2 package installed. Would be my first guess as well. Have you tried the workaround mentioned on the wiki (the one with ch

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on various distros

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:08:24PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: (*) Really bad hack, will break updates of unrelated packages in very interesting ways. I must admit that I have little sympathy for Ubuntu when it breaks due to "running ahead" of Debian. As I consider to be the case here. While

Re: [Sugar-devel] jhbuild hangs

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:19:33AM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: > >> 1237918544.817512 STARTUP: Starting the shell >> moku...@mokurai-laptop:~/dev/jhbuild/sugar-jhbuild$ XIO:  fatal IO >> error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X serve

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

On Tuesday 24 March 2009 10:26:23 Panu Matilainen wrote: > Hmm okay, any user being able to modivy rpm -V behavior is not exactly > good, although timestamp verify is pretty feeble business (considering rpm > doesnt raise conflicts on timestamp differences). If it's shared, then it should at leas

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:07:30AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> Basically, have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on %license files. >> >> Make that "have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on files whose >> hardlink count is > 1". That's reaso

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:07:30AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> Basically, have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on %license files. >> Make that "have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on files whose >> hardlink count is > 1". That's reasonably in line with how

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC Sugarize KDEEdu activity

On 24.03.2009, at 21:48, Huda Sammour wrote: Hi, from the project description at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/ProjectIdeas#KDEEdu I realized that I should use GTK, is there any thing wrong? I don't know who wrote up that idea. I'd find it much more useful to make Qt apps wo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on various distros

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:32:55PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:07:04PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> What workarounds? > Using Python 2.5 instead of Python 2.6 in Ubuntu Jaunty by changing > the symlink /usr/bin/pytho

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on various distros

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:07:04PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: What workarounds? Using Python 2.5 instead of Python 2.6 in Ubuntu Jaunty by changing the symlink /usr/bin/python (*), using python-gobject from sid as the one in squeeze is too old. The new one has passed the 10 day incubation

Re: [Sugar-devel] How is SoaS built?

coming in off the cuff here, but have we looked at headless "network appliance" type machines as school servers? On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:28 PM, David Farning wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> are there any pointers to how the SoaS build

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on various distros (was: Re: IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild: security update of xulrunner)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:39:39PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > I have installations working on Ubuntu jaunty and Debian squeeze, but > both required workarounds that are not acceptable on a regular system. > I have hope that these will be fixed in n

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on various distros (was: Re: IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild: security update of xulrunner)

Thanks for the update! david 2009/3/24 Sascha Silbe : > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 01:35:23PM -0500, David Farning wrote: > >> I have been trying to dog food Sugar on Jaunty. > > At least sugar-jhbuild is currently broken on a standard Jaunty install due > to a major bug Ubuntu introduced to Python

Re: [Sugar-devel] jhbuild hangs

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:19:33AM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: 1237918544.817512 STARTUP: Starting the shell moku...@mokurai-laptop:~/dev/jhbuild/sugar-jhbuild$ XIO: fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0" after 452 requests (452 known processed) with 0 ev

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Image Viewer 7

Hello, I have just release Image Viewer activity version 7, which contains fix for a nasty bug messing up the initial zoom level. Thanks to Tomeu for the patch. This is a release in the current stable branch, ie Sucrose 0.84. Thanks, Sayamindu NEWS: * Fix initial zoom level being extremely small

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on various distros (was: Re: IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild: security update of xulrunner)

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 01:35:23PM -0500, David Farning wrote: I have been trying to dog food Sugar on Jaunty. At least sugar-jhbuild is currently broken on a standard Jaunty install due to a major bug Ubuntu introduced to Python distutils. For now, only Ubuntu Intrepid and Fedora 10 work out o

[Sugar-devel] [Invitation] Bug Triage Sessio n @ Thu Mar 26 10am – 12pm (sugar-de...@l ists.sugarlabs.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20090326T14Z DTEND:20090326T16Z DTSTAMP:20090324T192407Z ORGANIZER:mailto:6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rn...@group.calendar.google.com UID:pf3l9bgjughu4j7pclb6jvb...@

Re: [Sugar-devel] Idea for SOC

Since my name was called: > I think this would be a very nice feature to have. However, I do not > think it is very likely to happen. > > 99.9% of Sugar users use Sugar on an OLPC XO-1 (maybe even more). In > general, Sugar is designed to target low-powered devices. Blender will > not be usable

Re: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild: security update of xulrunner

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Morgan Collett wrote: > 2009/3/24 Sascha Silbe : >> Hello! >> >> Short summary: >> If you're using sugar-jhbuild on Debian, please run "cd sugar-jhbuild && rm >> -rf source/mozilla source/hulahop install && ./sugar-jhbuild build" before >> using anything web-relate

Re: [Sugar-devel] How is SoaS built?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Hi everyone, > > are there any pointers to how the SoaS build works? Is it using the > Fedora livecd tools? Something else? > > more details below on what I am aiming for... Hey Martin, Good luck with Server on a Stick:) It would be ver

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration for museum project

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Luke Faraone wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote: >> >> The Tech Museum of Innovation in San Jose would like to create an >> exhibit of XOs and invite school classes in with their teachers. This >> depends on how well we can get collabo

[Sugar-devel] jhbuild hangs

I had sugar-jhbuild running until somebody told me it would conflict with the Ubuntu Sugar packages. I uninstalled the packages, and now sugar-jhbuild hangs on startup. Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic, removing from list! unrecognised device identifier! (EE) config/h

Re: [Sugar-devel] Idea for SOC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 vishak baby wrote: > I intend to create a platform where students can build their own objects > using some tools given and colour them in their own way.But the most > important thing is they can view their object in 3-D and rotate it as they > wish.For

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

The key I think will be: easy instructions, easy to install & configure Often a flowchart thing can work: "If you are running Windows XP and wish to use a separate USB key for each student, choose Option 1. If..." 2009/3/24 Caroline Meeks : > Good point Wade!!! Thank you, I always complain abo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Phonology (was Re: Fwd: Summer of Code Proposal: Furthering Speech Recognition in Sugar.)

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Sean DALY wrote: > :-) > > I'm no linguist, but we speak 3 languages in the house and I have been > fascinated to observe that my kids seem to "borrow" phonemes between > languages. I met somebody at a party once who said that has been > documented in bi- and tri-

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

> I've discussed it a bit in #sugar, and have decided to start a new project, > SoaS-emu , with the goal of > producing one-click installers for SoaS on workstations. For various reasons > I've decided to use VirtualBox, mostly becuase of our ability to

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Luke Faraone wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: >> >> VMware Player is available free for PC.  I'm not sure if it's free on >> Mac and Linux. > > It is not, AFACIT, free on Mac; the server version is free on Linux but is > too complic

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > VMware Player is available free for PC. I'm not sure if it's free on > Mac and Linux. > It is not, AFACIT, free on Mac; the server version is free on Linux but is too complicated for most people. > I'm not advocating that we standardize

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Bryan Berry wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:51 -0400, Wade Brainerd wrote: >> For what it's worth, I think that *both* Web and SWF activity >> frameworks are high priority. > > Wade is right, both are important. HTML5 has great potential but is not > a proven te

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

Good point Wade!!! Thank you, I always complain about people making things an either or solution when they aren't and I did just that! Thanks, Caroline On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > VMware Player is available free for PC. I'm not sure if it's free on > Mac and Linux.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar

On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:51 -0400, Wade Brainerd wrote: > For what it's worth, I think that *both* Web and SWF activity > frameworks are high priority. Wade is right, both are important. HTML5 has great potential but is not a proven technology while flash is. I do not believe though that it is des

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS won't boot XO-1s?

I am having a more fundamental issue. 1) First I used liveusb-creator on windows with Soas1 and created the crc and img files to install to the NAND. That doesn't work for me. 2) Next I tried technique one from Fedora 10 but the livecd-iso-to-disk does not have the --xo options. It looks like tho

Re: [Sugar-devel] Phonology (was Re: Fwd: Summer of Code Proposal: Furthering Speech Recognition in Sugar.)

:-) I'm no linguist, but we speak 3 languages in the house and I have been fascinated to observe that my kids seem to "borrow" phonemes between languages. I met somebody at a party once who said that has been documented in bi- and tri-lingual children, apparently as a way of "economizing" brainpow

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

VMware Player is available free for PC. I'm not sure if it's free on Mac and Linux. I'm not advocating that we standardize on a single solution. Some deployments will already be using VMs and we should be able to easily provide VM images which work with any of VMware, Parallels, or VirtualBox.

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

I was excited at the ease of installatin & configuration of VirtualBox then SoaS-1 March 5th on an Intel Mac Mini this past weekend. VirtualBox has a one-click installer and (having little hands-on experience with VMs) I found it not at all hard to follow the instructions. I was especially thrill

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar

For what it's worth, I think that *both* Web and SWF activity frameworks are high priority. SWF is a mature ecosystem. We have Gnash, 1000s of developers, and 1000s of existing SWF apps (including the OLE Nepal content). Performance characteristics are well known. HTML5 is brand new. We are rel

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

Hi Wade! On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > I do pretty much all my Sugar development on VMs running under Windows > XP. I primarily use VMware but have used QEMU a bit too. Will VMWare do what we need for free? Are you voting for VMWare over the other alternatives? >

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS won't boot XO-1s?

I have just updated firmware to Q2E35, no boot either from SoaS-1 March 5th or SoaS March 21st. Both of these boot my Acer Aspire One no problem. Weirdly, following the instructions on this page: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Manual_Firmware_Install failed with a bad CRC when the rom image was downlo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:16:05PM +0800, KSChan wrote: >Does webkit already support the html 5 draft ? More on html5 implementation status in various rendering engines here: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Implementations_in_Web_browsers - Jonas -

Re: [Sugar-devel] VMWare?

I do pretty much all my Sugar development on VMs running under Windows XP. I primarily use VMware but have used QEMU a bit too. Sebastien has been producing Virtual Appliance images for the recent releases which (mostly) work fine with VMware, VirtualBox, Parallels, etc. http://download.sugarlab

[Sugar-devel] VMWare?

Hi, VMWare recently made some stuff open source. Is anyone familiar with it? As I work in the schools it looks to me like a virtual machine will be a bigger part of the solution then I had originally thought. My vision is we have volunteers come in and install a VM on the schools computers so

Re: [Sugar-devel] Phonology (was Re: Fwd: Summer of Code Proposal: Furthering Speech Recognition in Sugar.)

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Sean DALY wrote: >> Greetings Satya, >> >  I seem to remember reading that most of the world's >> languages draw from a pool of only 50-60 phonemes. > > This turns out not to be the case. Individual language

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS won't boot XO-1s?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Sean DALY wrote: > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Installation/OLPC > > I am late writing an article on this and I'm not getting anywhere > because I can't boot either of my XOs from USB. I've had plenty of success booting from NAND and USB

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS won't boot XO-1s?

Hmmm instructions say that for Option 2 not Option 1... but it's true you had advised me that last week alrready I "burned" a SoaS-2 USB stick with Unetbootin for Windows today and it booted up my Acer Aspire One right away!! very snappy performance On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Walter Bende

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS won't boot XO-1s?

I think you need to use Q2E28 or higher (as recommended in the instructions??) I asked SDZ about SoaS-1 vs SoaS-2 and he thinks SoaS-2 is a better bet at this stage. I'll try it as soon as I touch down in Boston this afternoon. -walter On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Sean DALY wrote: > http:/

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar

Moving thread to sugar-devel. Jameson Quinn wrote: > Questions like that are best sent to sugar-devel, this list is just for > gsoc administrative/operational questions. > > To answer: the idea is to make hooks so you can save to journal, do > collaboration, and easily set up a sugar-like UI, f

[Sugar-devel] GSoC applications open until April 3 - Please continue to promote Sugarlabs GSoC

The Google Summer of Code applications period is open now, for both Sugar Labs and other participating organizations, and runs until 3 April at 19:00 UTC. We have had a

[Sugar-devel] SoaS won't boot XO-1s?

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Installation/OLPC I am late writing an article on this and I'm not getting anywhere because I can't boot either of my XOs from USB. I'm trying to follow the instructions for Option 1... questions: * Is there a minimum, or recommended firmware level?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

Kevin Kofler wrote: > Simon Schampijer wrote: >> So, the point to ship a license per package is fine. I actually did not >> want to relax that. I had the technical problem to need to access the >> license field to be able to display it in a dialog inside Sugar. >> >> http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~eri

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration for museum project

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote: > The Tech Museum of Innovation in San Jose would like to create an > exhibit of XOs and invite school classes in with their teachers. This > depends on how well we can get collaboration working. I have had many > failures with mesh networki

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar

On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 20:16 +0800, KSChan wrote: > Greetings, > > > Thx Jameson for clarifying ^^ I further get a few questions in mind. > > > 1. question on Karma... > I'm not quite familiar with webkit (although I always use it ^^") Does > webkit already support the html 5 draft ? > And, can

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar

Greetings, Thx Jameson for clarifying ^^ I further get a few questions in mind. 1. question on Karma... I'm not quite familiar with webkit (although I always use it ^^") Does webkit already support the html 5 draft ? And, can someone clarify for me that ... Is the project Karma aims to develop a r

Re: [Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild: security update of xulrunner

2009/3/24 Sascha Silbe : > Hello! > > Short summary: > If you're using sugar-jhbuild on Debian, please run "cd sugar-jhbuild && rm > -rf source/mozilla source/hulahop install && ./sugar-jhbuild build" before > using anything web-related the next time. > Otherwise (i.e. not running on Debian), pleas

[Sugar-devel] IMPORTANT: sugar-jhbuild: security update of xulrunner

Hello! Short summary: If you're using sugar-jhbuild on Debian, please run "cd sugar-jhbuild && rm -rf source/mozilla source/hulahop install && ./sugar-jhbuild build" before using anything web-related the next time. Otherwise (i.e. not running on Debian), please make sure sugar-jhbuild/source/m

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC Sugarize KDEEdu activity

On 24.03.2009, at 06:16, Huda Sammour wrote: hi all, I wnat to apply for Sugarize KDEEdu activity project. I am planning to write a proposal for it, but I need some confirmations. does Sugarize an activity mean to develop an application fro OLPC with sugar standards? It means to adapt a

[Sugar-devel] OLPC Afghanistan 1st deployment!

Dear all, It's our pleasure to announce that the 1st deployment of 395 XOs has happened in Afghanistan! Children of grades 4, 5 and 6 at Istiqlal high school in Jalalabad received their XOs on 17th of March 2009. XOs are fully localized into national languages of Afghanistan - Dari and Pashto, an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:07:30AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> Basically, have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on %license files. > > Make that "have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on files whose > hardlink count is > 1". That's reasonably in line with how rpm -V > currently tre

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Tom \spot\ Callaway wrote: > On 03/22/2009 05:18 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >> Heh, actually rpm has had %license special file attribute since rpm >> 2.5.4, it just doesn't really do much anything at all. It also doesn't >> play well together with %doc, AND since the ancient

[Sugar-devel] Google Summer of Code proposal: Improvements in Listen and Spell (Chirag Jain)

Hi, I am a second year computer science student at NSIT. I am looking to participate in GSoC this year. I am interested in Listen Spell project. I am in contact with its potential mentor Mr. Assim Deodia. Based on the conversation and discussion with him I have created an idea list related to list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 04:58:11AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >>> Now, if there were a clever way to handle this behind the scenes so that >>> these license files were not duplicated if they were identical, but >>> instead, symlinked to the lic

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

On 03/22/2009 05:18 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Heh, actually rpm has had %license special file attribute since rpm > 2.5.4, it just doesn't really do much anything at all. It also doesn't > play well together with %doc, AND since the ancient copyright -> license > tag change, %license as file at

Re: [Sugar-devel] How is SoaS built?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > we're currently using some livecd-creator incarnation with this build script > here [1] to get our live media created. But I don't know if you really want > a live image being created. Cool. A live image will do, combined with cjb's scr