Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread David Farning
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > following David Farning's advice, we want to keep the SugarCamp as > informal as possible.  Yet we want to have some tangible output, on > top of the obvious (and noble) task of building the Sugar community. > > So we have been brainstor

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien
Martin Dengler writes: > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:45:29AM +0200, Bastien wrote: >> - Update several XOs from another XO > > You mean > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Multicast_NAND_FLASH_Update#NANDblasting_an_Unsigned_NAND_Image_File > ? Well, yes, maybe (Samy?) Which reminds me we could add a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Dengler
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:45:29AM +0200, Bastien wrote: > - Update several XOs from another XO You mean http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Multicast_NAND_FLASH_Update#NANDblasting_an_Unsigned_NAND_Image_File ? > - Run Sugar on a Nokia N800 N810 ok? http://guysoft.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/nokia-n810-run

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien
Hi all, following David Farning's advice, we want to keep the SugarCamp as informal as possible. Yet we want to have some tangible output, on top of the obvious (and noble) task of building the Sugar community. So we have been brainstorming a bit and here are 17 challenges that we may want to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar version of Number Race?

2009-05-05 Thread Walter Bender
We should perhaps reexamine the JClic stuff as well, in light of Sugar on non-XO hardware. http://clic.xtec.cat/ -walter On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:33, Bastien wrote: >> I have just listened to a talk by Stanislas Dehaene this morning. >> He

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar version of Number Race?

2009-05-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:33, Bastien wrote: > I have just listened to a talk by Stanislas Dehaene this morning. > He mentioned "Number Race" - a software based on recent research > in cognitive science: > >  http://www.unicog.org/main/pages.php?page=NumberRace > > I don't know how hard it would b

[Sugar-devel] Sugar version of Number Race?

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien
I have just listened to a talk by Stanislas Dehaene this morning. He mentioned "Number Race" - a software based on recent research in cognitive science: http://www.unicog.org/main/pages.php?page=NumberRace I don't know how hard it would be to have a Sugar version, but I think it would be pret

Re: [Sugar-devel] Why setup.py?

2009-05-05 Thread Samuel Klein
setup.py has always bugged me for the reasons stated. SJ On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 28.04.2009, at 17:34, Luke Faraone wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:30, Bert Freudenberg > wrote: >> >> That would make sense. In fact, I previously made a mkDist.py scr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Why setup.py?

2009-05-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 28.04.2009, at 19:42, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 28.04.2009, at 17:34, Luke Faraone wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:30, Bert Freudenberg wrote: That would make sense. In fact, I previously made a mkDist.py script (in the etoys repo) that would call the bundle builder to create an x

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Fedora?

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Dengler
[cc'ing sugar-devel] On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:12:59PM +0500, Ashar Iqbal wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Martin Dengler > wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:06:07AM +0500, Ashar Iqbal wrote: > >> The PCs I have are not able to boot off USBs. I need to install Sugar on > >> the > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] versus, not

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > Fair enough. I agree that *most* people on the list agree that there > is not just one right way. And to use a metaphor that has been > oft-spoken in the US news of late, Sugar Labs has to have a "big > tent." > > Sugar itself has affordances