Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal files on regular desktop

2009-06-06 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > About a hierarchical file browser in Sugar, I think we need it anyway > for removable devices, but I'm not sure where we would put such a > window and how it would look like. > > Regards, > > Tomeu I have been using the character mode file brow

[Sugar-devel] I'm looking for a tree...

2009-06-06 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
I am looking for a fast data structure with the following properties: Maintains an indexed list of arbitrary, non-ordered objects (like a python List or C array) Allows fast: Insertion at any location Deletion at any location Lookup of an object by its index Reverse lookup, to determine the index

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] SSB creator

2009-06-06 Thread Bobby Powers
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote: > For my project, I will extend Browse with the ability to create SSBs. > Read more here http://honeyweb.wordpress.com/2009/06/06/the-user-experience/ > > I have made a small script that is triggered by a button in the Browse > toolbar. It also

[Sugar-devel] [GSoC] SSB creator

2009-06-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
For my project, I will extend Browse with the ability to create SSBs. Read more here http://honeyweb.wordpress.com/2009/06/06/the-user-experience/ I have made a small script that is triggered by a button in the Browse toolbar. It also works from Terminal. Later on this script will do more things,

Re: [Sugar-devel] OT: determining memory usage of short-lived processes

2009-06-06 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > I've examined memory usage of long running processes (i.e. daemons and > applications) in the past, no problems. If in the past you've used top, there's a new and more accurate way of measuring memory usage. Recent kernels export the 'smaps' of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Bastien
Sascha Silbe writes: > For most modules the directory name is the same as the module name (with > version appended in case of tarballs). For xulrunner it's different for > historical reasons. I had the hope we could get rid of xulrunner > completely (as a module of sugar-jhbuild), but as this has

Re: [Sugar-devel] [math4] Activity Awards, Activity Alerts, Frame Alerts

2009-06-06 Thread David Van Assche
Yeah, somehow people have very clear memories of their today seemingly innocent, but personally quite serious at the time, achievements/awards/stars/buttons, or whatever it was. The journal seems ilke the clear place to store this information, and it should be done in such a way that it can be easi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [math4] Activity Awards, Activity Alerts, Frame Alerts

2009-06-06 Thread Sean DALY
I don't know if this is related from a technical standpoint, but I was wondering about the possibility of a mechanism for an Activity to signal to a teacher (or the Neighborhood, or a Friend) when an Activity task is completed. As a way of simplifying identification of students who need more attent

Re: [Sugar-devel] [math4] Activity Awards, Activity Alerts, Frame Alerts

2009-06-06 Thread David Van Assche
Yeah, due to the lack of resources and time, we didn't get to finalise the end vision for such an award based system, but the idea came to me due how successful the collection of these is in computer games. As Gary pointed out to me, there are even games where the sole purpose is to unlock awards (

[Sugar-devel] OT: determining memory usage of short-lived processes

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
Sorry for the OT post, at least it's for my GSoC project. :) I've examined memory usage of long running processes (i.e. daemons and applications) in the past, no problems. But for my VCS comparison I need to determine the peak memory usage of all child processes (combined), which are rather sho

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-06 Thread David Van Assche
Maybe if you list some of the problems you are running into, we can help, as we must have gone through the same issues in order to get it working under openSUSE, Mandriva, et al. kind regards, David (nubae) On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:11:11PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:55:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> You wrote in ticket 137 that *hulahop* is broken in *Debian*: > Ah, sorry if that wasn't clear enough. I was tal

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:55:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: You wrote in ticket 137 that *hulahop* is broken in *Debian*: Ah, sorry if that wasn't clear enough. I was talking about hulahop in sugar-jhbuild, which doesn't build against the Debian-shipped xulrunner. (hint: maybe _I_ can h

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:37:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Do you mean that this is the case only for sugar-jhbuild or also for >> packaged sugar-xulrunner? > I don't kno

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:52:08PM +0200, David Van Assche wrote: >And though packaging debian is quite different from doing rpms, I just >finished getting all activities working for openSUSE. There were lots >of little glitches that prevented a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:37:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Do you mean that this is the case only for sugar-jhbuild or also for packaged sugar-xulrunner? I don't know anything about the sugar-xulrunner package, you have to ask the Ubuntu team about that. I only maintain sugar-jhbuild, no

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-06 Thread David Van Assche
And though packaging debian is quite different from doing rpms, I just finished getting all activities working for openSUSE. There were lots of little glitches that prevented activities from working,so if u run into any issues with particular activities, ping me and I might be able to tell u how to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:50:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> As for your problem, I would not recommend compiling xulrunner >> yourself (if jhbuild even supports that) - yo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Bastien wrote: So why did I need to "rm -rf source/mozilla source/hulahop" before rebuilding? Politically correct answer: because xulrunner often breaks after updates and rebuilding it from scratch fixes it. Maybe I miss something here, but the hard p

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Bastien
Sascha Silbe writes: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:19:04PM +0200, Bastien wrote: > >> Maybe ./sugar-jhbuild could make sure that directories are clean? > It's by design. Only changed portions of the code should get > rebuilt. Doing a full rebuild each time would be a huge waste of > resources. So

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:19:04PM +0200, Bastien wrote: Maybe ./sugar-jhbuild could make sure that directories are clean? It's by design. Only changed portions of the code should get rebuilt. Doing a full rebuild each time would be a huge waste of resources. Or maybe we could have ./sugar-j

[Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild broken on Debian squeeze (was: Re: Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild)

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:55:49AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: Please check you've installed all dependencies (i.e. ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck returns nothing), remove old build results (rm -rf source/mozilla source/hulahop) and try again (./sugar-jhbuild build). Just noticed sugar-jhbuild rece

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Bastien
Sascha Silbe writes: > Please check you've installed all dependencies (i.e. ./sugar-jhbuild > depscheck returns nothing), remove old build results (rm -rf > source/mozilla source/hulahop) and try again (./sugar-jhbuild build). Maybe ./sugar-jhbuild could make sure that directories are clean? Or

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Bastien
Sascha Silbe writes: > Unfortunately we have to do that (compiling xulrunner ourselves in > sugar-jhbuild) because Debian changed the xulrunner location [1]. While > the new location (...-1.9) is way better (and should be changed upstream > as well), hulahop currently only supports the upstream w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:03:03AM +0200, Bastien wrote: | ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a: member ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a(nsDeque.o) in archive is not an object | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | make[3]: *** [libxul.so] Erreur 1 Please check you've installed all dependencies (i.e

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: As for your problem, I would not recommend compiling xulrunner yourself (if jhbuild even supports that) - you should probably instead install xulrunner-dev. Unfortunately we have to do that (compiling xulrunner ourselves in suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Library-1

2009-06-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:39, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > This is in initial release of Library activity. I decided to release it > before implementing collab features to get some feedback about UI and basic > ideas of activity. So, it can browse only local objects. Some related work in the G

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] [IAEP] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-06 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:29:45PM -0700, Josh Williams wrote: > Thanks everyone, > > Gary mentioned > > "Hey, fab, looking much cleaner/simpler/Sugar-like :-) One quick > thought (will try to take a closer look later), would double > thickness borders work better, make the colour the

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-06 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:30:13PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 17:11, James Simmons wrote: > > Tomeu, > > > > The thing is, in the code below I *am* using style.zoom.  It seems to have > > no effect at all. > > What I would have supposed that would work is using in 0.84 a f

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:16:29AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 00:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:37:32PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: >>>You are already on it by virtue of your work and contributi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 00:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:37:32PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: >>You are already on it by virtue of your work and contributions.  Please >>edit http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Packaging_T

Re: [Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:03:03AM +0200, Bastien wrote: >Still failing to compile sugar-jhbuild: > >, >| ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a: member >../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a(nsDeque.o) in archive is not an object >| collect2: ld returned

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-06 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:42:36AM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > Josh, > > I attempted to upload Read Etexts to your site. The upload seemed to go OK > but there is no Activity found yet. Maybe it needs to be promoted from the > sandbox? thats because you didn't even complete it so, you need t

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-06 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:16:44AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:40, James Simmons wrote: > > I mentioned before that I'm having a font sizing problem on the XO > > running .82.  When I set a font on a textviewer it looks OK running > > under sugar-devel or SoaS by is *much