Re: [Sugar-devel] Physics activity (Was: Release v3 tonight?)

2009-07-14 Thread Asaf Paris Mandoki
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 13 Jul 2009, at 05:46, Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote: > > On 13 Jul 2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: >> >> Think we need to make a call on the stability of the new Physics Journal >>> state format first, or at least make sure everyone kn

Re: [Sugar-devel] How To fix my bad cloned sticks

2009-07-14 Thread Caroline Meeks
On 7/14/09, Dave Bauer wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Caroline > Meeks wrote: > > Here is the how to we are going to use tomorrow to fix the 3rd grade > > sticks. I'm putting it up here for critique. If there is anyway to > > streamline it let me know because we are going to have to

Re: [Sugar-devel] How To fix my bad cloned sticks

2009-07-14 Thread Dave Bauer
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Caroline Meeks wrote: > Here is the how to we are going to use tomorrow to fix the 3rd grade > sticks.  I'm putting it up here for critique.  If there is anyway to > streamline it let me know because we are going to have to do it 12 times. > Is there a way to get ri

Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Greg Smith wrote: > As I got there I noticed a kid had unplugged their USB before full > shut down and they were frantically trying to plug it back in while > errors scrolled on the screen. Still not sure if they lost data (will > check tomorrow on kid who made the

Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Caroline Meeks
On 7/14/09, Gary C Martin wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > On 15 Jul 2009, at 02:33, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Caroline Meeks >> wrote: >> >>> As Greg said we finally got collaboration working! >>> >>> The problem was that we had cloned the owner.key and owner.key.pub.

Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Martin, On 15 Jul 2009, at 02:33, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Caroline Meeks > wrote: >> As Greg said we finally got collaboration working! >> >> The problem was that we had cloned the owner.key and >> owner.key.pub. The fix >> was to delete those before cloni

Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Gary C Martin
On 14 Jul 2009, at 21:35, Greg Smith wrote: > I also spent 1/2 hour debugging collaboration. Dave and Gary helped on > IRC. They pointed me a tool called Analyze (can someone put that on > the main activities page ASAP? I didn't write down the URL and will > need to fetch it again tomorrow). Done

Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Caroline Meeks wrote: > As Greg said we finally got collaboration working! > > The problem was that we had cloned the owner.key and owner.key.pub.  The fix > was to delete those before cloning and on existing sticks delete them and > restart. Excellent. Great to h

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Analyze-8

2009-07-14 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Url: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4200 Release notes: Reviewer comments: Tested on Sugar 0.85.1 sugar-jhbuild VM, and Sugar 0.82 XO-1. Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.suga

[Sugar-devel] How To fix my bad cloned sticks

2009-07-14 Thread Caroline Meeks
Here is the how to we are going to use tomorrow to fix the 3rd grade sticks. I'm putting it up here for critique. If there is anyway to streamline it let me know because we are going to have to do it 12 times. Is there a way to get rid of the jabber key without losing the name? Boot Write down t

[Sugar-devel] Unstable 0.85.1 reporting/feedback policy

2009-07-14 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi, Just wanted to check on the etiquette regarding reporting issues with unstable release 0.85.1 and on. Would you like lots of new tickets assigned to 'Git as of bug date' (there's no formal mention of 0.85), some IRC chats, email chatter, or a wiki page? :-) If there's a wiki that alread

Re: [Sugar-devel] Physics activity (Was: Release v3 tonight?)

2009-07-14 Thread Gary C Martin
On 13 Jul 2009, at 05:46, Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote: > On 13 Jul 2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: > >> Think we need to make a call on the stability of the new Physics >> Journal state format first, or at least make sure everyone knows >> the storage format may (or may not) be stable long t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Conozco Uruguay on Activities.Sugarlabs.org?

2009-07-14 Thread Gabriel Eirea
Pictures from RAP Ceibal volunteers: http://picasaweb.google.es/voluntariosrapceibal 2009/7/14 Caroline Meeks : > Actually, what might be cool to do tomorrow is bring in my XO and show it to > them on the XO.  Do you have any pictures of kids in Uruguay playing this > specific game? Is there a g

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Conozco Uruguay on Activities.Sugarlabs.org?

2009-07-14 Thread Caroline Meeks
Actually, what might be cool to do tomorrow is bring in my XO and show it to them on the XO. Do you have any pictures of kids in Uruguay playing this specific game? Is there a good place for me to go to show kids in Uruguay using XOs in general? Thanks On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Gabriel Ei

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Conozco Uruguay on Activities.Sugarlabs.org?

2009-07-14 Thread Gabriel Eirea
Thank you. Scaling is in the todo list. I hope to have it working soon. I never thought the activity would be used outside an XO. Regards, Gabriel 2009/7/14 Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero : > Hi Activity approved > > Url: > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4199 > > Release notes: > > > Revi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Conozco Uruguay on Activities.Sugarlabs.org?

2009-07-14 Thread Caroline Meeks
Yes, we need to fix scaling before we can use it at GPA because our screens are a different size. Should I put in a ticket? On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero < dir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Activity approved > > Url: > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4199 > > R

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora

2009-07-14 Thread Martin Dengler
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:24:22PM -0500, Philippe Clérié wrote: > I hoped that there was a Fedora spin of sugar, but it appears that > was folded into Soas. But Soas is not designed to be installed on a > hard disk. What do you want on a Sugar Fedora spin besides what "yum install sugar*" gets y

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora

2009-07-14 Thread Philippe Clérié
I've had both Soas and Sugar on Fedora installed in KVM machines. A year ago or so I had problems with the joyride builds, so that's progress... :-) Soas seems to work just fine so far. I have a couple of issues with Fedora but I am not sure yet they qualify as bugs. 1) I need a way to make Su

Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Caroline Meeks
As Greg said we finally got collaboration working! The problem was that we had cloned the owner.key and owner.key.pub. The fix was to delete those before cloning and on existing sticks delete them and restart. This gives us solid collaboration inside the computer lab if we go local (take out the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Conozco Uruguay on Activities.Sugarlabs.org?

2009-07-14 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Hi Activity approved Url: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4199 Release notes: Reviewer comments: This request has been approved. But this activity doesn't scale at all and at least on 1024x768 it looks a bit not useful. It would be great if you implement scaling. I'm also added 0.82 to su

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Conozco Uruguay-4

2009-07-14 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Url: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4199 Release notes: Reviewer comments: This request has been approved. But this activity doesn't scale at all and at least on 1024x768 it looks a bit not useful. It would be great if you implement scaling. I'm also added 0.82 to supported Sugar Platfor

Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Dave Bauer
Analyze activity is on http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities direct download http://dev.laptop.org/~edsiper/bundles/Analyze-8.xo Dave On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm sending this to the devel instead of the IAEP list as it contains > a number of technical/UI de

[Sugar-devel] GPA School Visit report for Tuesday July 14

2009-07-14 Thread Greg Smith
Hi All, I'm sending this to the devel instead of the IAEP list as it contains a number of technical/UI design comments that I think need developer follow up. Feel free to forward to other lists, blogs etc. as appropriate. Notes: I joined the team (Anurag, Caroline, and Bill) as the class of 22

Re: [Sugar-devel] Re : Re : Missing french manuals on the french homepage of flossmanuals

2009-07-14 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Dufour writes: >> De : Bastien >> You mean that the userbase of the french site is anyone from the >> internet, while the userbase from the translation site is anyone >> who registered to flossmanuals? > > No, the userbase of the French site is anyone who registered to > fr.flossmanuals

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > >However, to installing sugar-chat-activity (65-1) requires to deinstall > sugar > >0.82.95 & another associated packages and to upgrade it to sugar-0.84 > >(0.84.6-4). > > What?!? So the problem with blank screen running sugar-emulator was > using 0.82 on Squeeze? Not

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:32:32PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >Selon Jonas Smedegaard : [instructions on workaround for broken initial 0.84 login] >> After this, a regular "sugar-emulator" should work. > >done and ... BINGO! > >I installed su

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > > I believe not. An obvious test is to purge the package again ;-) I did it ... finaly, I got sugar 0.82.9-5 running. See below. > > See the related thread at the mailinglist, it looks like exact same > problem I am having. > > If so, you should be able to work aroun

Re: [Sugar-devel] Re : Missing french manuals on the french homepage of flossmanuals

2009-07-14 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Dufour writes: >> De : Bastien >> IIUC, "moving out the translation zone" is kinda making the french >> version official, right? And I guess we can still work on these >> official versions? Am I right? > > Yes, you're right. But you must register on the French site first. ok > The tr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to add webkitgtk as a external dependency

2009-07-14 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: >> This mail is a request/proposal to add webkitgtk as an external >> dependency for either Sugar or Read > > I object strongly either way. > > The last thing Sugar needs is a hard dependency on _both_ maj

Re: [Sugar-devel] Re : Missing french manuals on the french homepage of flossmanuals

2009-07-14 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Dufour writes: > Adam, could you please move Sugar from the translation zone to the > French site? I can't do it by myself because it would do a standard > transfer, and we need a complete move (a real copy in the French > manuals and removed from the translation zone) and keep the origin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to add webkitgtk as a external dependency

2009-07-14 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 06:10:12PM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > >> Since the version of pywebkitgtk shipped in both Fedora >> and Ubuntu are way behind the latest release, I plan to ship that with >> the activity bundle for now > > T

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:59:50PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >Selon Jonas Smedegaard : >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 02:44:28PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >> >One dependency-resolution alternative proposed by aptitude is to >> >uninstall g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Latest release of Read Etexts, some questions

2009-07-14 Thread Jim Simmons
Aleksey, I downloaded and installed the RPM last night and it seems to work OK. Thanks. James Simmons > (not sure) you can attach soas repo and insall gstreamer-plugins-espeak > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/repositories/2 > > or just download rpm > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/repos

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Conozco Uruguay on Activities.Sugarlabs.org?

2009-07-14 Thread Gabriel Eirea
Hi Caroline: I have just uploaded Conozco Uruguay to activities.sugarlabs.org but it needs to get thru an editor before being published. By the way, I have been writing a tutorial on how to modify the activity in order to include different maps and questions. It is still in Spanish only, but if y

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 02:59:03PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: >On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>Do you mean to say that GConf-DBus is currently used with >>non-packaged Sugar, or just that it would be a cool idea

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to add webkitgtk as a external dependency

2009-07-14 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > This mail is a request/proposal to add webkitgtk as an external > dependency for either Sugar or Read I object strongly either way. The last thing Sugar needs is a hard dependency on _both_ major browser engines. Moreover, it's entirely unnecessary in this case. ePub

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 02:44:28PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: > >Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > >> >3/ Tried to install sugar-web-activity > >> >The package conflicts with: > >> >- python-hulahop (unsatisfied depend

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:32:40PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: before log Lagersegmentfejl (core dumped) Just happened to meet Michael on #sugar, looks like he's seen a similar issue: 15:27 < m_stone> silbe: I ran into some segfaults myself while working at it, which pointed

[Sugar-devel] livecd-creator creates ISO without /home

2009-07-14 Thread Martin Dengler
Hi, I'm getting a .ISO without a /home despite the filesystem rpm being installed, and I'd really appreciate any tips on debugging this or hints as to how this might happen. This is with the example .ks and I can get livecd-creator to work on a number of other machines. If I chroot and install t

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:55:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: def main(): cleanup_logs() print "before log" logger.start('shell') print "after log" before log Lagersegmentfejl (core dumped) Strange, logger.start() doesn't seem to call any non-Python stuff. What happ

Re: [Sugar-devel] note about questions in #sugar

2009-07-14 Thread Frederick Grose
Other options that can be recommended are the Team and Project FAQ pages each with Talk:[Team]/FAQ links for posting new questions on the Sugar Labs wiki. There is also the http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_help#Help_Requests: page. These may focus the question to the appropriate parties, but i

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to add webkitgtk as a external dependency

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 06:10:12PM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: Since the version of pywebkitgtk shipped in both Fedora and Ubuntu are way behind the latest release, I plan to ship that with the activity bundle for now That will most likely break on any non-x86 architecture, potentially on

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 02:44:28PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >Selon Jonas Smedegaard : >> >3/ Tried to install sugar-web-activity >> >The package conflicts with: >> >- python-hulahop (unsatisfied dependency) >> >- python-xpcom (unsatisfied dep

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Do you mean to say that GConf-DBus is currently used with non-packaged Sugar, or just that it would be a cool idea to do so in the future? sugar-jhbuild uses GConf-DBus. That's also the reason why I didn't encounter the problems

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > > > >3/ Tried to install sugar-web-activity > >The package conflicts with: > >- python-hulahop (unsatisfied dependency) > >- python-xpcom (unsatisfied dependency) > > I am not familiar with gnewsense, but this might be a too new Browse > that requires 0.84 Sugar. > > If

[Sugar-devel] Request to add webkitgtk as a external dependency

2009-07-14 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
Hello all, I am planning on merging the epub-support branch with mainline in Read sometime this week. This adds a dependency on webkitgtk and pywebkitgtk. Since the version of pywebkitgtk shipped in both Fedora and Ubuntu are way behind the latest release, I plan to ship that with the activity bun

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:49:56PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >I installed sugar - on a gnewsense/debian(mipsel) pc, in 3 steps > >1/ apt-get install sugar >I got sugar running with "sugar-emulator". The version is "82.1" > >I got a gnome failu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian/gnewsense mipsel

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:24:11PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: Here another report of jh-build on a mips-architectured machine with gnewsense (debian/lenny based) Gnewsense is not a supported distro and since it's lenny-based it probably won't contain the package versions we need. If ther

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:23:46AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: >>On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:54:43AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>>Using sugar-emulator, initial login fails. It is p

[Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
I installed sugar - on a gnewsense/debian(mipsel) pc, in 3 steps 1/ apt-get install sugar I got sugar running with "sugar-emulator". The version is "82.1" I got a gnome failure report ("sugar-shell-rapport-anomalie"). I'll send it off-list to those who are interested 2/ I added sugar-pippy, suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian squeeze i386

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:21:45PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: *** Checking out squeak *** [22/41] svn checkout http://squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/branches/olpc squeak svn: OPTIONS of 'http://squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/branches/olpc': could not That's Debian bug #529920. Upgrading to libneon27-gn

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian squeeze i386

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:21:45PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >Hi Jonas, > >here my report after running jh-build on a debian/squeze pc (i386 arch) Thanks but no thanks: I do packaging for Debian, not "anything Debian". Please do not cc me on

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian/gnewsense mipsel

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Hi Jonas, Here another report of jh-build on a mips-architectured machine with gnewsense (debian/lenny based) Machine 2: gnewsense (debian based) mips-el 64 s...@gns:~/dev/sugar/sugar-jhbuild$ ./sugar-jhbuild Cloning upstream jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/samy/dev/sugar/sugar

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian squeeze i386

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Hi Jonas, here my report after running jh-build on a debian/squeze pc (i386 arch) Machine 1 : debian i386 squeeze/sid git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild 1/ Missing packages: automake automake1.9 cdbs devscripts docbook-xsl gnome-common gtk-doc-tools icon-

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration Plan for the GPA tomorrow

2009-07-14 Thread Dave Bauer
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Caroline Meeks wrote: > We will be at the GPA tomorrow and we'll have time to test after class, > probably around 12:30. > > So far all I have planned is to try getting rid of the jabber key on the > master and try cloning some new sticks. > > We will also enable de

Re: [Sugar-devel] Add ability to record to Speak?

2009-07-14 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:55:36PM -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote: > Hi, > > We worked with 3rd going into 4th graders at the GPA in Boston today making > memorize games using social studies terms. The kids drew pictures and added > them to the memorize game. > > The kids are very interested in "ma

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian (was: Re: Sugar on Beagle board.)

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Samy, On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:15:22AM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >I have a few debian machines (unstable and testing) available for >testing, in both the i386 and mipsel (lemote box + netbook) >architectures. > >My past experiencess wi

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Memorize-33

2009-07-14 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Url: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4063 Release notes: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4063#release-notes Reviewer comments: Trusted activity Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:23:46AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: >On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:54:43AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >[Sugar 0.84 in squeeze] >>Did you actually try it? >No, but I didn't try any other distro packages either. > >>My expe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian (was: Re: Sugar on Beagle board.)

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Hi Sascha, Selon Sascha Silbe : > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:15:22AM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: > > > The alternative with sugar-jhbuild is (at least for me) not really > > usable in > > Debian due to failed dependencies. > Can you elaborate on that, please, given that you're running testin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian (was: Re: Sugar on Beagle board.)

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:15:22AM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: The alternative with sugar-jhbuild is (at least for me) not really usable in Debian due to failed dependencies. Can you elaborate on that, please, given that you're running testing and unstable where sugar-jhbuild should work

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:54:43AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [Sugar 0.84 in squeeze] Did you actually try it? No, but I didn't try any other distro packages either. My experiences with using the Sugar packages in unstable is not good. Using sugar-emulator, initial login fails. It is p

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian (was: Re: Sugar on Beagle board.)

2009-07-14 Thread s . boutayeb
Hi Jonas, Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > > This problem have existed for a while now - but noone seems to have > experienced it beyond me (no bugreports or questions about it on > mailinglists), which make me suspect that noone use Sugar on Debian > except me. In other words be warned if you want to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian (was: Re: Sugar on Beagle board.)

2009-07-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:01:29AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: >On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz >Guerrero wrote: > >>>Another option that I didn't try yet would be to install debian >>>on the >>>beagleboard and apt-get

[Sugar-devel] note about questions in #sugar

2009-07-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, when someone asks a question in #sugar about a part of the project in which we aren't directly involved, it would be good to tell those people to try again at a later moment or send email to the mailing list. We have contributors from all around the world and the chances that the most appropr

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian (was: Re: Sugar on Beagle board.)

2009-07-14 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote: Another option that I didn't try yet would be to install debian on the beagleboard and apt-getting sugar, but I'm afraid that it would include version 0.82 of sugar. yep. I'm afraid that's truth. Not anymore. See

Re: [Sugar-devel] Missing french manuals on the french homepage of flossmanuals

2009-07-14 Thread Bastien
Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero writes: > In a quick search i didn't find those either, this seems estrange , > because iirc the translations were already done while ago The translations are there: http://translate.flossmanuals.net/bin/view/XO_fr/WebHome http://translate.flossmanuals.net/bin/view

Re: [Sugar-devel] Missing french manuals on the french homepage of flossmanuals

2009-07-14 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Hi Bastien. In a quick search i didn't find those either, this seems estrange , because iirc the translations were already done while ago Rafael Ortiz On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Adam, > > when I go to the french homepage of flossmanuals, I don't see the french > manu