Gary C Martin wrote:
> How many ebooks could you distribute (and
> store) for the bandwidth (and nand space) taken up by downloading the
> required dependancies for Java.
A hell of a lot. That's why we need to display prominently exactly how
much space each item in the Journal takes, includin
Hi Aleksey,
On 30 Aug 2009, at 01:23, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:51:22AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
h
http://www.slideshare.net/moodler/moodle-development-educause-australia-6th-may-2009
expected end 2009 - early 2010
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
ht
(Regarding 0install):
> It is interesting, but fails horribly badly in the case of no, or low
> bandwidth Internet.
I'm not convinced, for three reasons.
First, there is "0share"
http://0install.net/0share.html
which seems to me to be remarkably similar to our long-stated goal of
"horizo
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:51:22AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> >>0install looks quite promising to me and
> >>
> >>http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Syste
On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>> 0install looks quite promising to me and
>>
>> http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
>>
>> is good reading about the general issues involved.
>>
>> Has an
Walter,
I tried deleting /etc/olpc-security but that had no effect, Even
rebooting after deleting olpc-security had no effect. I managed to
copy the log messages from my previous efforts to the clipboard and
save them to a thumb drive:
reserved credentials (10002, 10005)
adding group: /usr/sbi
Just a quick heads up that it looks like google will be running a
second round of GHOP[1].
It will likely be later this year or early next year.
So high school teachers and students let's start thinking about this.
Any volunteers ready to stick up hand their to run the program for
SL:)
The cool
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> 0install looks quite promising to me and
>
> http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
>
> is good reading about the general issues involved.
>
> Has anyone here experimented with it?
>
> Regards,
>
>
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is good reading about the general issues involved.
Has anyone here experimented with it?
Regards,
Michael
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Su
Bill Kerr writes:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Bastien wrote:
>
> After a discussion with the FSF, they agreed the picture was not really
> appropriate and that the text should clearly distinguish OLPC from Sugar.
>
> They will make an update - stay tuned.
>
> the picture i
The list was created to ensure and give the possibility to people that
don't know English or are not to confident in it to participate in
Sugar development,
We'll hope that students and developers from all Spanish-speaking
countries take the lead and begin to support the overall sugar
development.
Hi Ben,
On 29 Aug 2009, at 18:24, Ben Wiley Sittler wrote:
> I think, then, that I would rather just ship it as an activity bundle
> for "Sugar+Java or Sugar+OpenJDK", since the versioning issues (which
> OpenJDK version should I use, exactly?), licensing issues (GPLv2 &
> GPLv2+classpath-excepti
I suggested pre-parsed code mostly to get rid of dependency on headers
and other source packages; a bit like a JIT that always compiles and
caches everything. LLVM IR in particular is just a high lever
assembler, so it could be distributed without any dependencies (even
on build tools).
There's al
Lucian Branescu wrote:
> This is a bit of a stretch, but would it be possible to distribute
> GIMPLE or LLVM IR and finish the compilation on installation?
> Installing would take longer, but it should work on any architecture
> the code can compile to.
Currently, Sugar has a number of blessed int
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié :
> Your points are well taken and generally I agree with them. Except
> that I never suggested you should "abandon upstream development".
> Sugar is your calling card, your differentiator, your trademark, your
> value added... etc, etc, etc. It's what make you, you. :-) I
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié :
> Your points are well taken and generally I agree with them. Except
> that I never suggested you should "abandon upstream development".
> Sugar is your calling card, your differentiator, your trademark, your
> value added... etc, etc, etc. It's what make you, you. :-) I
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 10:25 -0400, Luke Faraone escribió:
>
> Well, the USB format idea was left unimplemented as we (I) couldn't
> get it working, but we should probably take a look at makebootfat to
> achieve the same goals.
Or just use parted instead of fdisk to wipe the MBR and create it
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 13:38, Luke Faraone wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:15, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
>>> Please join if you would like to participate in discussions about
>>> Sugar development in Spanish.
>>
>> Won't this have the side
Your points are well taken and generally I agree with them. Except
that I never suggested you should "abandon upstream development".
Sugar is your calling card, your differentiator, your trademark, your
value added... etc, etc, etc. It's what make you, you. :-) I would
never think of abandoning
resending to list via my proper email:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:15, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>
>>
>> it would be great if someone could expand this paragraph:
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Soas#Boot
>>
>> This page is not even linked from it:
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_
This is a bit of a stretch, but would it be possible to distribute
GIMPLE or LLVM IR and finish the compilation on installation?
Installing would take longer, but it should work on any architecture
the code can compile to.
2009/8/29 Tomeu Vizoso :
> 2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié :
>> Well, I wasn't at
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 15:17 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
> BTW, are all these details about USB booting being collected somewhere
> on a wiki page?
it would be great if someone could expand this paragraph:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Soas#Boot
This page is not even linked from it:
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié :
> Well, I wasn't attempting to solve anything. I thought I was just
> brainstorming.
>
> These past few weeks there have been a lot of discussions about
> processes. Meanwhile, I am heading into the classroom with a
> somewhat unstable and unfinished platform not to ment
Well, I wasn't attempting to solve anything. I thought I was just
brainstorming.
These past few weeks there have been a lot of discussions about
processes. Meanwhile, I am heading into the classroom with a
somewhat unstable and unfinished platform not to mention very little
guidance as to exac
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:12:03AM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
For the underlying fs I believe the best (i.e. reliable + fast +
non-wearing) is ext4 with journaling disabled.
One of the problems we were seeing in the lab when using a ove
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:26:41AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 02:40:38AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 06/01/09 08:39, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I need much more details; *all* Award BIOSes make in the past 10-12
years have version number 6.00PG.
Ouch, I no longer
I don't think anyone was suggesting that it is OK to smear OLPC. In
fact, this thread was begun because a number of us are outraged at the
smear campaign that is (presumably) largely a result of ignorance.
That said, OLPC and Sugar Labs are not the same. OLPC makes hardware
and currently distribut
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> For the underlying fs I believe the best (i.e. reliable + fast +
> non-wearing) is ext4 with journaling disabled.
One of the problems we were seeing in the lab when using a overlay for user
changes was that if the students unplugged the U
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 08:55:09PM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
I noticed a problem when attempting to unsquash the SoaS filesystem and
extract it on to a flashdrive: it's over 1.2GiB.
Since squashfs is read-only, is there a good read-write filesystem that
achieves decent compression (while not
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié :
> Why not treat Sugar as a distribution in its own right. As in: Sugar
> is a GNU/Linux distribution with Sucrose as it's user interface. It
> seems to me you're generally drifting in that direction. With Soas
> it's now treated more or less as a spin/remix so it's not t
Why not treat Sugar as a distribution in its own right. As in: Sugar
is a GNU/Linux distribution with Sucrose as it's user interface. It
seems to me you're generally drifting in that direction. With Soas
it's now treated more or less as a spin/remix so it's not that much
of an extension.
As an
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 13:38, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:15, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> Please join if you would like to participate in discussions about
>> Sugar development in Spanish.
>
> Won't this have the side effect of a segmented development community?
It has all the
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:15, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
> Please join if you would like to participate in discussions about
> Sugar development in Spanish.
Won't this have the side effect of a segmented development community? On
which list would consensus be authoritative?
--
Luke Faraone
http:/
Hi,
several development groups are being formed right now in Latin America
and in order to make easier for them to work together a new list has
been created:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-desarrollo
Please join if you would like to participate in discussions about
Sugar development i
Abbyy could distribute the free version of their software with a
license that allows it to be redistributed with Sugar, or more
precisely whatever activity uses it. But that would allow people to
make full-featured clones of Abbyy's software, so I doubt it.
2009/8/28 Edward Cherlin :
> I was at a
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:29, Ben Wiley Sittler wrote:
> A friend of mine wrote a hand/eye coordination game called SarynPaint
> and recently released the source code. SarynPaint is written in Java,
> so you'll need to install OpenJDK to use it. I just checked in minimal
> support for launching it
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kerr wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Bastien
> wrote:
>>
>> After a discussion with the FSF, they agreed the picture was not really
>> appropriate and that the text should clearly distinguish OLPC from Sugar.
>>
>> They will make an update - stay tun
i am still working out the new html/css layout for "adding_up"
you can check it out here
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/karma/repos/mainline/blobs/master/examples/adding_up_to_10/mytest.html
i still haven't tested out animation in this layout. I spent most of
this week figuring out basic css
39 matches
Mail list logo
