Re: [Sugar-devel] gtk.Label expanding/aligning issue

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 23:10, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having trouble with making a gtk.Label expand to the whole screen. You mean the whole screen or the whole available space? I've tried various combinations of box packing options, label props and box props, no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.8

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 21:30, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:42:58PM -0400, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: * Install sugar-emulator.desktop application file #1139 Please do not ship autogenerated desktop file with tarball.  Noone but Tomeu needs a file hardcoded to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.8

2009-09-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:39:33AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 21:30, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:42:58PM -0400, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: * Install sugar-emulator.desktop application file #1139 Please do not ship autogenerated desktop

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SoaS: Searching for Decision Panel volunteers.

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 22:27, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: Hi all, Sebastian Dziallas has asked for clarity on how the SoaS distribution he maintains is going to be treated and considered by SL.  It doesn't seem that there's consensus, so we suggest forming a Decision Panel:   On the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:51, Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:17, Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.9

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this release just removes some autogenerated files from the tarball. Thanks to Jonas Smedegaard for noticing it and to Daniel Drake for telling the solution. == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.9.tar.bz2

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-19 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/9/19 Chris Ball c...@laptop.org:   Should Sugar Labs be a Linux distributor, rather than just an   upstream producing Sugar releases?   Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and   refuse to endorse one over another?   Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is Sugar LiveUSB

2009-09-19 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:43:53PM -0600, Douglas McClendon wrote: Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:54:30PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote: There seems to be a lack of consensus of what SoaS actually is or what it's goals (use cases) should be. I'd like to say I see your point,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89

2009-09-19 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:51, Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote: Could be, perhaps we should hear first about real world scenarios on which this could be useful? Maybe on a school with computer labs all with the same

Re: [Sugar-devel] gtk.Label expanding/aligning issue

2009-09-19 Thread Lucian Branescu
To be more precise, I'd like all the text except the first paragraph to extend to the left and right borders. 2009/9/19 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 23:10, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having trouble with making a gtk.Label expand to the

Re: [Sugar-devel] gtk.Label expanding/aligning issue

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 15:38, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: To be more precise, I'd like all the text except the first paragraph to extend to the left and right borders. Do you know if the vbox they are in extends to those borders or not? I use to write a small gtk script

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [support-gang] which Sugar(s) will/should run on XO's? [was: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94]

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 16:25, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote: It's hard for me to understand why we are dropping so fast support for the XO-1. I'm not sure why you say that, who is dropping support for the XO-1? I'm just pointing out that we need help coordinating the effort of

[Sugar-devel] Glucose 0.84 and 0.85 packaged for Debian!

2009-09-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi all, As subject says, Glucose (and some of Fructose) 0.84.0 and 0.85.7 is now packaged for Debian! More info at http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar and http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Debian . - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Glucose 0.84 and 0.85 packaged for Debian!

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 00:32, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hi all, As subject says, Glucose (and some of Fructose) 0.84.0 and 0.85.7 is now packaged for Debian! More info at http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar and http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Debian . Wow,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Debian-olpc-devel] [IAEP] Glucose 0.84 and 0.85 packaged for Debian!

2009-09-19 Thread David Farning
I tried them out briefly in a VM this morning, worked great. A couple of questions. I don't understand the debian work flow. I see that you are carrying .82, .84, and .85. Will you continue to carry all of them going forward? Do you have a recommended work flow for basing downstream packages

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Debian-olpc-devel] [IAEP] Glucose 0.84 and 0.85 packaged for Debian!

2009-09-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi David - and everyone else, [please don't cross-post: respond only to OLPC list as requested] On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:49:00PM -0500, David Farning wrote: I tried them out briefly in a VM this morning, worked great. Wauw, you are quick! Good to hear that that at least initial tests work.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Debian-olpc-devel] [IAEP] Glucose 0.84 and 0.85 packaged for Debian!

2009-09-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:43:25AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 00:32, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: As subject says, Glucose (and some of Fructose) 0.84.0 and 0.85.7 is now packaged for Debian! More info at http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Smile activity version 1

2009-09-19 Thread Wade Brainerd
Hi Tony, Sorry for taking so long to respond to this one. I had a similar problem in Colors! and solved it by adding a timer event while playback was running: 1350def start_update_timer(self): 1351if self.update_timer: 1352gobject.source_remove(self.update_timer) 1353

Re: [Sugar-devel] Smile activity version 1

2009-09-19 Thread David Farning
By way of introduction for the newer contributors-- Wade started and was the first co-ordinator of the Activities Team. He took a break last spring for the birth of a child:) I wonder if he has looked at activities.sugarlabs.org lately. It has had over 680,000 activity downloads, most of them

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Karma] thinking about knavbar

2009-09-19 Thread Bryan Berry
Pavel ji, shall I merge your code in myself or would u like me to walk u through how to do it w/ git? I should be at @sugar for most of today btw Pavel ji means Pavel sir in Nepali ;) On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 04:37 +0100, Pavel Mocan wrote: New update for Karma CSS and HTML. Live at

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Karma] thinking about knavbar

2009-09-19 Thread Bryan Berry
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 04:37 +0100, Pavel Mocan wrote: New update for Karma CSS and HTML. Live at www.mpavel.ro/projects/Karma/ I had to change quite a lot of the HTML as it was not using the HTML5 syntax. This way the source code brings more semantic to the whole document and the structure

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Karma] thinking about knavbar

2009-09-19 Thread Bryan Berry
http://edward.oconnor.cx/2009/09/using-the-html5-sectioning-elements This blog post has a great example of how to use html5 tags in a semantically meaningful way. On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 04:37 +0100, Pavel Mocan wrote: New update for Karma CSS and HTML. Live at www.mpavel.ro/projects/Karma/