Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 01/07/2010 05:19 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Simon Schampijer wrote: >> When they resume a previous activity, and they wanted to start a new >> one, I have seen learners erasing the previous content and keep on >> working in that activity. > > This is the purpose of resume-by-default. The

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Walter, >>> I have observed certain difficulties with the 'resume' and 'start a new' >>> activity concept. At the moment we have the following situation: >>> >>> *** Current Situation: >>> In the Home View you can resume an activity and start a new one. The >>> option to start a new activity is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Etoys: toolbar

2010-01-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Bert, thanks for the quick feedback. On 01/06/2010 04:10 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 06.01.2010, at 11:54, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Some thoughts that came up today - I will turn into bugs or discard >> after feedback. >> >> Is there a reason the etoys save a copy (keep as)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Vijit, On 01/07/2010 12:45 PM, vijit singh wrote: > Hello Simon, > > Yes, I believe that's a good point. It's a bit confusing at times. I myself > got confused a few times in the beginning when I switched over from sugar > 0.82 to 0.84 and was in a habit of clicking the activity icon at once as

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Services

2010-01-07 Thread Wade Brainerd
Happy New Year! Can we bundle some 0install sources (blobs) in the .xo file? Like, for Colors! could I bundle the {py25,py26}_{x86,x64} 0install sources in the .xo file and specify a local path when starting up? Thus, remote 0install is only invoked in a less common scenario, where the user is m

Re: [Sugar-devel] Several chapters of "Make Your Own Sugar Activities!" ready for review, feedback

2010-01-07 Thread Wade Brainerd
Hi Jim, Just wanted to say, this looks awesome! I love the overall writing style, the scattered pearls of wisdom and bits of humor, and the extensive use of screenshots. I'll try to provide some more detailed comments soon. Great work! -Wade On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jim Simmons wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-07 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major > idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by > stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient > "ASLO for needs" site). Hi Aleksey

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2010-01-07

2010-01-07 Thread Walter Bender
=== Sugar Digest === 1. Aleksey Lim has started a discussion [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-January/009726.html] about how to better coordinate—in a more welcoming and friendly manner—our various development activities with the needs of deployments. This complements the Luke Faraone

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-07 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Simon Schampijer wrote: > When they resume a previous activity, and they wanted to start a new > one, I have seen learners erasing the previous content and keep on > working in that activity. This is the purpose of resume-by-default. The idea arose in response to feedback from Uruguay, where stu

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on a Stick Planning Meeting Tomorrow

2010-01-07 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Please join us in #sugar-meeting tomorrow - directly after the SLOBs meeting (so around 1600 UTC) - for a SoaS meeting. Topic will obviously be the future of SoaS for v3. --Sebastian ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-07 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:34:04PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > maybe I wasn't enough clear, tools like wiki are to common, e.g. why > > people use bugs tracker instead of wiki or mls. > > Trackers, um, track state of the issues/bugs/tasks

Re: [Sugar-devel] Removing Log and Terminal from favorites view

2010-01-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 14:13, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:27 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> I'm ok with that, but I think that the favorites file in the sugar >> tarball should be considered an example, and nothing that packagers >> and deployers should accept as-is. > > OK, push

Re: [Sugar-devel] Removing Log and Terminal from favorites view

2010-01-07 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:27 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > I'm ok with that, but I think that the favorites file in the sugar > tarball should be considered an example, and nothing that packagers > and deployers should accept as-is. OK, pushed. But one thing to be aware of: there is normally a gap b

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-07 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:45 AM, vijit singh wrote: > Hello Simon, > Yes, I believe that's a good point. It's a bit confusing at times. I myself > got confused a few times in the beginning when I switched over from sugar > 0.82 to 0.84 and was in a habit of clicking the activity icon at once as in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-07 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > maybe I wasn't enough clear, tools like wiki are to common, e.g. why > people use bugs tracker instead of wiki or mls. Trackers, um, track state of the issues/bugs/tasks, and let you - form a narrow forum of discussion on a very specific topi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-07 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:20:30PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Collab_mockup > > > > I see that you are pointing to Ubuntu's "brainstorm", wh

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-07 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Collab_mockup > > I see that you are pointing to Ubuntu's "brainstorm", which has a huge > overlap with the wiki-ish "blueprints" and tasks/bugs

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-07 Thread vijit singh
Hello Simon, Yes, I believe that's a good point. It's a bit confusing at times. I myself got confused a few times in the beginning when I switched over from sugar 0.82 to 0.84 and was in a habit of clicking the activity icon at once as in sugar 0.82. I think a better option would be to - 1) show

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-07 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Collab_mockup I see that you are pointing to Ubuntu's "brainstorm", which has a huge overlap with the wiki-ish "blueprints" and tasks/bugs as tracked in launchpad/malone. Comparing Ubuntu's brainstorm with their o

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] 'Resume' vs 'Start a new' Activity

2010-01-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, I have observed certain difficulties with the 'resume' and 'start a new' activity concept. At the moment we have the following situation: *** Current Situation: In the Home View you can resume an activity and start a new one. The option to start a new activity is in the palette of the activ