On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:59:10AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 21 Jun 2010, at 04:36, James Cameron wrote:
> > Found some patches in my repository not yet merged upstream, so I'm
> > sending them again.
I was wrong, you had merged them by applying the changes ... just that
they didn't have th
>From b599e9842eb6bca119e08b100b4602d328a48fe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Cameron
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:16:54 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] remove broken slideshow until it is fixed #2054
---
data/graphics/slideshow | 66 ---
1 files changed,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:32:52PM +, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from James Cameron's message of Fri May 21 09:42:28 + 2010:
>
> > + # fill the screen with white
> > + screen.fill((250, 250, 250))
> Might it be worth noting that it's just almost-white, with 255 being
> the maximum (t
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:41, akashg1611 wrote:
> The following patch incorporates the new toolbar design in
> the Physics Activity. Also attached is the SVG icon of the
> Create button, as was required for the new toolbar.
Thanks for taking the time to make a patch! Is it possible for you to cr
Hi James,
On 21 Jun 2010, at 04:36, James Cameron wrote:
> Found some patches in my repository not yet merged upstream, so I'm
> sending them again.
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> <0001-fix-olpcgames-license.patch><0002-wrap-olpcgames-license.patch><0003-include-license-f
[we're just arguing for fun now, I guess]
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:59:01PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Martin Dengler
> wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > When you have the time, some clarity here would be appreciated.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hmm, I have never heard of a company taking over maintenance of a
> module, anybody has references? It uses to be the individuals who
> accept the responsibility of maintaining a module.
I do. In the case of Moodle, both "MoodleHQ", various M
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Martin Dengler
wrote:
> David,
>
> When you have the time, some clarity here would be appreciated.
>
> Martin
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:58:32PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> > Over the past co
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Sorry, I was asking about splitting the "staff".
Here I agree with Tomeu. A subtext of my "experimental branches" post
is that we're too small to split people into clubs (and it's
counterproductive anyway).
But we all have experimental / con
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Martin Dengler
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:02:57PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning wrote:
>> >> Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> I think this is an unfair recount of my work, so I'm going to put some
> light on it and ask that my frankness is excused.
Hi Tomeu,
I am sorry. Don't mean to attack your work. I have seen 3
implementations (os767 -- not sure the sugar versi
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 21:02, David Farning wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning wrote:
Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of
>>>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:02:57PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning wrote:
> >> Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of
> >> deployment submitted patches has stretched th
David,
When you have the time, some clarity here would be appreciated.
Martin
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:58:32PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> > Over the past couple of months, Activity Central has been establishing
> > a network
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 17:48, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
>
I think this is an unfair recount of my work, so I'm going to put some
light on it and ask that my frankness is excused.
> - Reworking the datastore... while I welcome efforts in a new
> datastore... _every Sugar release has a new DS imple
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 21:02, David Farning wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning wrote:
>>> Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of
>>> deployment submitted patches has stretched the core mainta
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 19:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Manusheel Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Gonzalo,
>> Neat work.
>
> Ok. Pushed.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Gonzalo Odiard
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have two changes I would include in this release.
>>> The firs
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 21:53, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> On 18 June 2010 05:04, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> It has been mentioned that by updating these dependencies, we'll have
>>> to build some more modules in jhbuild for distros such as Debian
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 01:34, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Fri, 18-06-2010 a las 11:29 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
>
>> > Long term, both approaches are essential to the evolution of a project.
>> > Some large hi-tech companies I worked for in my previous life solved the
>> > conflict of approa
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 03:10, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 08:33:50PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> We've found an XO-1 running Fedora 11 + Sugar 0.84 with an interesting
>> datastore corruption issue.
>>
>> The journal was showing just one object, but the
>> ~/.sugar/default/
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 02:33, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> We've found an XO-1 running Fedora 11 + Sugar 0.84 with an interesting
> datastore corruption issue.
>
> The journal was showing just one object, but the
> ~/.sugar/default/datastore directory contained 4-5 invisible entries.
> After removin
21 matches
Mail list logo
