Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Pippy-36

2010-07-15 Thread Anish Mangal
These will be included in Pippy-37 > remove broken slideshow until it is fixed #2054 > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/46bcc0f0cb327955c4f9f33617229a8ed20d0b66 > > minor example fixes following review > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/3

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Pippy-36

2010-07-15 Thread Anish Mangal
Hi, > Tested fine on XO-1 os301. Thanks for testing! > What happened to my fixes to the examples? I can't remember where that > was up to. ;-) Are you referring to these commits ;-) remove broken slideshow until it is fixed #2054 http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/4

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Paul Fox
daniel wrote: > On 15 July 2010 18:26, Walter Bender wrote: > > Presumably there is a way to detect which keyboard is installed in the > > machine? While I love Gonzalo's use of the F5-F8 keys, the need for > > Frame and Journal keys on the non-membrane keyboards is more important > > in my e

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Pippy-36

2010-07-15 Thread James Cameron
Tested fine on XO-1 os301. What happened to my fixes to the examples? I can't remember where that was up to. ;-) -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listi

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Drake
On 15 July 2010 18:26, Walter Bender wrote: > Presumably there is a way to detect which keyboard is installed in the > machine? While I love Gonzalo's use of the F5-F8 keys, the need for > Frame and Journal keys on the non-membrane keyboards is more important > in my experience. Yes, let's limit

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> This is a regression. It used to (2007) return keycodes. > > May be. Where is the keyboard definition? Gonzalo ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys > (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other > uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys > to enlarge or

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys > (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other > uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys > to enlarge or

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys to enlarge or reduce the brush, the fonts,etc. If we need F5 and F6 to the jou

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Gary Martin
On 15 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Tim McNamara wrote: > On 16 July 2010 10:50, Daniel Drake wrote: > Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in > agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should > press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness). > > This matches beha

Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Tim McNamara
On 16 July 2010 10:50, Daniel Drake wrote: > Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in > agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should > press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness). > > This matches behaviour of "normal" laptops, including the Dell that

[Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, On the XO HS (highschool edition, the one with a more "normal" keyboard) we're facing some questions about how the F keys should function, under sugar and GNOME. The technicalities are in http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10213 and here is a picture of the keyboard: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_

[Sugar-devel] SoaS-4 Feature Freeze approaching

2010-07-15 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
Hi All, Just a reminder that SoaS-4 feature freeze is rapidly approaching. The feature freeze is July 27th. So we're a little under 2 weeks away from feature freeze so please get your features in. If you need help or have queries regarding the process please email the soas list. Regards, Peter B

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Pippy-36

2010-07-15 Thread Anish Mangal
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Pippy/Pippy-36.tar.bz2 == News == * Add COPYING based on activity.info license field, verify source file licenses, include LICENSE from Elements upstream SVN, fixes Sugarlabs.org #1571 and laptop.org #9181. (James Cameron) *

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11

2010-07-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Thu Jul 15 13:56:03 + 2010: > This is just a workaround for F11 or we should submit a patch with this? This is specific to distributions shipping an old version of GTK (Ubuntu 9.04 and Fedora 12 apparently have the same issue - I didn't notice because

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Castelo
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 15:56, Daniel Castelo > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Sascha Silbe > > wrote: > >> > >> Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:15:01 + > 2010: > >> > I think that we talke

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11

2010-07-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 15:56, Daniel Castelo wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Sascha Silbe > wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:15:01 + 2010: >> > I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install >> > jhbuild >> > on fedora 1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Castelo
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Sascha Silbe < sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org> wrote: > Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:15:01 + 2010: > > I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install > jhbuild > > on fedora 11 and I get this error message. S

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-artwork-0.89.2

2010-07-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, the last tarball was botched, so here is a (hopefully) good one. Sorry about the trouble. == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.89.2.tar.bz2 == News == * Remove mention of files in Makefile.am that aren't committed __

Re: [Sugar-devel] Error building jhbuild

2010-07-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:22:26 + 2010: > I get this error when I try to run the build command. Please always post error messages in english. The following should do the trick: export LC_ALL=C > make[4]: *** No hay ninguna regla para construir el objetivo > `net

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11

2010-07-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:15:01 + 2010: > I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install jhbuild > on fedora 11 and I get this error message. Seems like the problem is a > dependency between jhbuild and gtk. > should Jhbuild work over f11? F11

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar] Don't break if we may not own NetworkManagerUserSettings

2010-07-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
User settings will be removed from NetworkManager in the future. Also the user might not have privileges to handle user settings - e.g. because of logging in remotely (LTSP-style setups). Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe --- src/jarabe/model/network.py | 18 +++--- 1 files changed, 15

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11

2010-07-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 20:15, Daniel Castelo wrote: > I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install jhbuild > on fedora 11 and I get this error message. Seems like the problem is a > dependency between jhbuild and gtk. > should Jhbuild work over f11? > __