On 1 August 2010 12:11, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> so, 3:0 for "cubes"..
>
> I guess the place where these cubes are produced could be named
> refinery.sugarlabs.org
+1
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote:
> > On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
{...}
>
so, 3:0 for "cubes"..
>
Sugar "cubes" nicely suggest a regular, ordered volume that would hold
packed content, which
Hi all,
What about having normal favions and icons for SL sites (current favions
looks for me like "$" symbols).
I already have a couple of ideas:
* library icon for activities.sl.o like
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4089
I hope after switching to new AMO codebase, ASLO w
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
> >
> > The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
> > (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
> >
On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
>
> The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
> (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
>
> * primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralized
>
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
>
> The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
> (GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
>
> * primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralize
Hi all,
Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
The reasons to not reuse "package" name - it is not regular
(GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
* primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralized
which is the core point of regular distros
* sugar "packag
On 30.07.2010, at 20:25, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
>> Hi Chris--to address scalability we have a list view from which
>> you can select favorite activities to go in the ring. This is a
>> similar technique to the OSX dock or Windows taskbar.
>
> I don't think this is working out.
Yep
Matt,
In order to reduce the maintain burden OLPC Debian and Ubuntu
Sugarteam have a rather distinct workflow. Would you mind joining IRC
#ubuntu-sugarteam between 9am and noon and 9pm and mid night? We have
developers from around the world working so those are two prefer
times we try to be avai
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 08:04:35PM +0530, Anish Mangal wrote:
> >> > I agree that 'hiding' the action buttons away in a toolbar is rather
> >> > unfortunate :-( , but wouldn't placing buttons as in the original
> >> > layout eat up vertical space?
> >>
> >> No more than before (as has been the desi
> With this version, I n longer have an edit toolbar. This is a regression.
>
No (and neither does the current Pippy-36 version), I've yet to merge
that code into the mainline. This was just for testing out local
toolkit.
> It really is not so difficult to maintain toolbars across different
> ver
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Anish Mangal
wrote:
>>> > I agree that 'hiding' the action buttons away in a toolbar is rather
>>> > unfortunate :-( , but wouldn't placing buttons as in the original
>>> > layout eat up vertical space?
>>>
>>> No more than before (as has been the design for years
>> > I agree that 'hiding' the action buttons away in a toolbar is rather
>> > unfortunate :-( , but wouldn't placing buttons as in the original
>> > layout eat up vertical space?
>>
>> No more than before (as has been the design for years).
>
> The old design with the buttons in the middle always
I have a version which will let you reposition the icons (haven't
added swap yet) but I am not sure how best to reset the layout. We
could have a separate icon on the Home View secondary palette that
will reset the spiral to an initial state. Any other ideas?
-walter
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:40
I am heading off to vacation for a week, but I may get a chance to
play with moving/snapping the icons as well. In the meantime, the code
is quite simple:
--- favoriteslayout.py 2010-07-20 13:31:05.0 -0400
+++ favoriteslayout.py 2010-07-30 23:26:56.0 -0400
+
+class MyLayout(Ring
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Frederick Grose wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> {...}
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is a tighter spiral of 74 icons for the home view (running in the
>> Sugar emulator at 8
16 matches
Mail list logo
