2010/8/11 NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu:
We used to do that, the problem is that we don't control our platform
as Google controls Android and you need to make sure that resources
that need to be specific of each child process aren't shared (dbus and
X connections, etc).
I'm personally more
Hi,
one more excellent thing coming from NZ: http://nzjrs.github.com/osm-gps-map/
Anybody up for doing an activity that uses it? Should be a matter of
placing the widget inside the canvas and connecting some buttons to
call some methods on it.
Regards,
Tomeu
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 06:39, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:24:43AM +, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586 [...]
Traceback (most recent call last): [...]
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sugar/activity/activity.py, line
600, in
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 00:38, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This patch gets rid of some almost-dead code in sugar-presence-service
for handling bitmap avatars.
The idea is that the PS is going to disappear soon. Do we really want
to make such cleanups given that?
Regards,
Tomeu
This exception doesn't seem related to the cairo bug. I'll try to
reproduce it on my XO. Please file a bug report if you haven't
already.
Cairo version:
cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/__init__.py, line
108,
Hi,
any code contributor is expecting that their patches will be tested by
the reviewer? If that is the case, we should make more clear in the
review process that patches should have been tested _before_ they are
submitted for acceptance.
Because of this specific commit, file transfers have been
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 00:38, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This patch gets rid of some almost-dead code in sugar-presence-service
for handling bitmap avatars.
The idea is that the PS is going to
Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Sun Aug 08 02:06:21 +0200 2010:
Is there interest in pushing an updated sugarbot to git.sl.o?
Sure, go ahead! If you need commit rights, please write to systems@ and
I'll transfer the project to you. The original author, a GSoC student,
has already stated
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 17:17, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Sun Aug 08 02:06:21 +0200 2010:
Is there interest in pushing an updated sugarbot to git.sl.o?
Sure, go ahead! If you need commit rights, please write to systems@ and
Hi,
have just entered a new feature page for the removal of the Presence
Service, which is being proposed as a feature for 0.90. In the page
you have links to previous discussions and to the bigger plans.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Remove_Presence_Service
Regards,
Tomeu
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 13:28, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 00:38, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This patch gets rid of some almost-dead code in sugar-presence-service
for
Hi James,
On 11 Aug 2010, at 04:05, James Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:48:00PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
... and was also unsuccessful in convincing OLPC to prelink the shared
libraries before shipping a release, thus allowing read-only pages to
not get dirtied with shared
gary wrote:
P.S. of corse you'll now tell me os850 was also pre-linked (I couldn't see
anything about it in the build notes for either os850 or os851), and I'll
look
silly for trying to test for a difference, confirming my results were non
significant ;-)
that's exactly right.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
one more excellent thing coming from NZ: http://nzjrs.github.com/osm-gps-map/
Anybody up for doing an activity that uses it? Should be a matter of
placing the widget inside the canvas and connecting some buttons
On 11 Aug 2010, at 18:42, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
gary wrote:
P.S. of corse you'll now tell me os850 was also pre-linked (I couldn't see
anything about it in the build notes for either os850 or os851), and I'll
look
silly for trying to test for a difference, confirming my
Far more up-to-date is:
CMU volunteer Nick Doiron's very latest Map Activity here -- with 5
offline MapPacks to date for Rwanda, Ghana, Uganda, Peru, Haiti --
priceless in developing countries with weak Internet:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Ndoiron/OfflineMap
Walter Bender wrote:
On
I would like to start a thread on unit integration testing. I have two
main questions:
1) Where should tests be located
2) Which testing framework to use
Some options for 1:
- every Sugar project decides for itself
- root/tests in each project
- a meta project that houses tests for
On 12 August 2010 03:17, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.orgwrote:
Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Sun Aug 08 02:06:21 +0200 2010:
Is there interest in pushing an updated sugarbot to git.sl.o?
Sure, go ahead! If you need commit rights, please write to systems@ and
I'll
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4038
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.88
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/27008/speak-17.xo
Release notes:
* Get rid of smart bundles.. and look ahead for smart packaging system
Sugar Labs Activities
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
Forwarding this to sugar-devel
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tony Rizos tri...@pacbell.net
Date: Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:44 PM
Subject: Speak.Activity v16 on Build 802 - Problem
To:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:22:00PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
any code contributor is expecting that their patches will be tested by
the reviewer?
I don't think a reviewer should be expected to test patches as part of
a review process, but if they choose to test then they should indicate
this
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:02:26AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
The idea is that the PS is going to disappear soon. Do we really want
to make such cleanups given that?
I don't think unimplemented future plans are an acceptable justification
for refusal of a patch.
--
James Cameron
On 12 August 2010 13:30, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
2) Which testing framework to use
Whatever the test developer and activity developer can agree on.
I don't know enough about the options to choose.
(p.s. I'm aware of your work on Sugarbot. While this is fantastic, I'm
23 matches
Mail list logo
