Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-17 Thread Tom Parker
On Wed, August 18, 2010 2:06 pm, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Would a Firefox -> Save complete page copy be good enough for this > purpose? Even better would be a Charles http://www.charlesproxy.com/ or Fiddler http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/ trace.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-17 Thread Tom Parker
On Wed, August 18, 2010 2:04 pm, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Tabitha, if you happen to have access to a configuration similar to mine > could you maybe check whether the WiFi login pop-up that you had issues > with > in Browse-115 works in Browse-108? Sorry, we have left Samoa. The WiFi system

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-17 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Lucian Branescu wrote: > Afaict, this isn't a bug in Browse, but in sugar.activity.Activity. I > also can't find any evidence in the logs that it segfaults. I'm afraid > unless I can reproduce it I can't do anything. > > Could you save the HTML page that opens a ne

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-17 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
On a possibly related note: I just discovered that Browse-108 (on XO-1.5 with build 851) doesn't open the pop-up in Horde at all. In the past I remember that particular pop-up being somewhat of an overlay window (similar to the Journal's object chooser). Tabitha, if you happen to have access to a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Remove Presence Service

2010-08-17 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> I still think we should move away from GObject for non UI stuff :) > > Agreed, but as above I think it should be a cleanup goal rather than > having feature patches fixing it bit by bit. Sure, I agree. Marco ___

[Sugar-devel] Awards / certificates / prizes (was: Re: Appropriate to call myself "senior developer"?)

2010-08-17 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from James Simmons's message of Mon Aug 16 22:00:04 +0200 2010: > Maybe that could be an inducement to volunteer for Sugar Labs. Make a > significant contribution and somebody in authority, maybe Walter > Bender, gives you a cool title. Maybe a signed certificate you could > hang in the

[Sugar-devel] Oompa-Loompas (was: Re: Appropriate to call myself "senior developer"?)

2010-08-17 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Bernie Innocenti's message of Sun Aug 15 06:19:40 +0200 2010: [Calling myself senior developer + sysadmin] > +1 from me... Thanks to everyone for all the positive replies! > ...as long as I can be "Senior Wizard Extraordinaire and Überhaxc0r at > Sugar Labs and everywhere else" :-)

Re: [Sugar-devel] code submitted for review should have been tested

2010-08-17 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Because of this specific commit, file transfers have been broken since > early this year and it's obvious that this code wasn't tested at all: > > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/commits/11828796 > > Given the current po

Re: [Sugar-devel] Class vs. Exec activity.info

2010-08-17 Thread Justin Lewis
Is there a documentation location that keeps a master list of API changes? Doing a quick search didn't seem to turn up anything that is up to date. Justin Lewis http://jlewopensource.com On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 17:38, Daniel Drake wrote

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-artwork-0.89.3

2010-08-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.89.3.tar.bz2 == News == * Alternative to Create a new wireless network. #1610 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] Class vs. Exec activity.info

2010-08-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 17:38, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 17 August 2010 09:30, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> sorry for the confusion. I was quite confident that those fields were >> not in use anymore :/ I reverted the commit and added a warning that is >> printed when used. > > Whats the motivation

Re: [Sugar-devel] Class vs. Exec activity.info

2010-08-17 Thread Gary Martin
On 17 Aug 2010, at 16:30, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 08/17/2010 02:25 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm just starting to see some bug tickets and mention in the 0.90 notes that >> the activity.info class parameter is being dropped, with the exec parameter >> replacing it. Could someon

Re: [Sugar-devel] Class vs. Exec activity.info

2010-08-17 Thread Daniel Drake
On 17 August 2010 09:30, Simon Schampijer wrote: > sorry for the confusion. I was quite confident that those fields were > not in use anymore :/ I reverted the commit and added a warning that is > printed when used. Whats the motivation for removing the field? To me, naming a class is more logic

Re: [Sugar-devel] Class vs. Exec activity.info

2010-08-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 08/17/2010 02:25 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just starting to see some bug tickets and mention in the 0.90 notes that > the activity.info class parameter is being dropped, with the exec parameter > replacing it. Could someone explain what's going on, point me to some > documentatio

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.89.3

2010-08-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.89.3.tar.bz2 == News == * Revert "Support dropped for activity.info fields 'service_name' and 'class'" * Print warnings about the deprecated activity.info fields __

[Sugar-devel] Requesting Feedback MarketLab Opportunity

2010-08-17 Thread John Tierney
Hello Everyone, We have an opportunity this Fall to be part of a MarketLab Student Project, http://web.mit.edu/marketingclub/marketlab/ We have been asked to submit a proposal for the marketing needs of Sugar Labs on Friday, August 20th. I have sent this to the multiple lists because I beli

Re: [Sugar-devel] Volunteer certificates

2010-08-17 Thread James Simmons
Bert, That's damned impressive. Congratulations! James Simmons > Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:09:49 +0200 > From: Bert Freudenberg > Subject: [Sugar-devel] Volunteer certificates > To: Sugar Devel > Message-ID: <9ea6d99a-c5bc-4640-a4b6-fad2fa99e...@freudenbergs.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; c

[Sugar-devel] Class vs. Exec activity.info

2010-08-17 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi, I'm just starting to see some bug tickets and mention in the 0.90 notes that the activity.info class parameter is being dropped, with the exec parameter replacing it. Could someone explain what's going on, point me to some documentation, and/or a mail-list thread about it? There are plenty

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Remove Presence Service

2010-08-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 23:33, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > I don't have enough time for a very detailed review and I don't really > know telepathy, but here a few comments. Mostly nitpicks, it looks > great in general. > > +        BuddyIcon.__init__(self, buddy=get_owner_instance(), size=size)