There are apparently a few facts from Plan Ceibal's deployment that
are not well known in the community. This surprises me, given that
some of you have been here in Uruguay and I was under the assumption
that you were well aware of these facts. I will refrain to give my
opinion and describe a few f
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Gabriel Eirea wrote:
> There are apparently a few facts from Plan Ceibal's deployment that
> are not well known in the community. This surprises me, given that
> some of you have been here in Uruguay and I was under the assumption
> that you were well aware of thes
To me, one of the more compelling arguments for considering GPLv3 is
"When the Rules Are Broken: A Smooth Path to Compliance". We have been
engaged of late in a parallel discussion regarding a possible
violation of the Sugar GPLv2. If this were actually to be the case,
the violator will have to go
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> To me, one of the more compelling arguments for considering GPLv3 is
> "When the Rules Are Broken: A Smooth Path to Compliance".
Interesting! I hadn't thought it'd be so awkward, but if one is to be
100% formal, you need to do something lik
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Gabriel Eirea wrote:
> Fact 1: in Plan Ceibal the XO 1.0 and XO 1.5-HS don't provide access
> to root.
Yes, but as Walter indicates, I understand it is allowed in newer OSs.
In any case I am aware of efforts to make it available.
> This means that Sugar can't be
Dipankar,
Glad you guys tried.
+1 on your initiative. We have a good team, and should definitely continue
on these projects.
Regards,
Manu
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Dipankar Patro wrote:
> Sorry guys, we couldn't make it from my side in GSOC. :(
>
> But I think we should continue on t
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4365
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.92
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/27329/ceibalradio-2.xo
Release notes:
Sugar Labs Activities
http://activities.sugarlabs.org
___
S
Test of booted live CD
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Fedora-SoaS#Fedora-15-Nightly-20110425.17-i686-Live-soas.iso
Thomas Gilliard
satellit on #sugar freenode IRC
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http:/
Hi all,
Today (Apr 26), Web UI for git.sugarlabs.org will be inaccessible
starting from 20:00 UTC for 2 hours. Only UI, so "git pull/push" commands
will work as usual.
--
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:22 PM, roberto wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>> ==Sugar Digest==
>>
>>
>> 5. Cynthia Solomon has put her excellent book, co-authored by Margaret
>> Minsky and Brian Harvey, on Logo programming, ''LogoWorks: Challenging
>> Programs in
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:26 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > useless because children can install absolutely no additional software
> > packages (they can't do "yum install").
>
> Um - again you _can_ install sw in your homedir. Not as practical but
> possible.
It would be quite painful for us
Hi Sugar folks,
[cutting off a few recipients I knwo is subscribed to lists]
On 11-04-26 at 12:57pm, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:26 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
> > > useless because children can install absolutely no additional
> > > software packages (they can't do "
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Sean DALY wrote:
> http://fsfe.org/projects/gplv3/europe-gplv3-conference.en.html
> http://fsfe.org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-rms-transcript.en.html
>
> see question 6b from this Q&A from the 3rd International GPLv3
> Conference (Barcelona, June 22-23, 2006):
>
> **
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> By updating to the GPLv3, we make a clear political statement that
> commercial usage is ok, but our software must always remain free for
> users to use, study, share *and* modify.
1) I'm not interested in using Sugar code to make politi
Hi,
I'm seeing an odd bug running Fedora 13 Sugar on ARM. When I launch any
Sugar activity:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/sugar-activity", line 21, in
main.main()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sugar/activity/main.py", line 101, in
main
locale_path = i18
On 04/26/2011 06:38 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing an odd bug running Fedora 13 Sugar on ARM. When I launch any
Sugar activity:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/sugar-activity", line 21, in
main.main()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sugar/activity/main
I already helped him with this.
The issue was the ~/.i18n file missing due to olpc-utils not being in the
build, and Sugar/various applications' inability to compensate (
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10682 - although some progress has been made on
this). Chris compensated for this by adding an En
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> I already helped him with this.
>
> The issue was the ~/.i18n file missing due to olpc-utils not being in the
> build, and Sugar/various applications' inability to compensate (
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10682 - although some progress
18 matches
Mail list logo
