Hi,
is this [1] the latest version of the Sugar docs? What is the current
process for updates (e.g. the upcoming 0.96). Is there someone working
on that end? There were questions here at the GNOME doc hackfest [2]
what Sugar is doing for documentation and I am not sure if I am fully up
to
Hi,
there have been recent work on theming in GTK+.
From the raleigh theme (the default theme that gets used if you did not
apply a theme or loading failed) some default settings have been removed
(like default background color and a default padding) [1][2].
As well the a11y-base.css [3]
Hi Simon,
Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de writes:
is this [1] the latest version of the Sugar docs? What is the current
process for updates (e.g. the upcoming 0.96). Is there someone working on
that end? There were questions here at the GNOME doc hackfest [2] what
Sugar is doing for
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Bastien b...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Simon,
Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de writes:
is this [1] the latest version of the Sugar docs? What is the current
process for updates (e.g. the upcoming 0.96). Is there someone working on
that end? There were
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 11:10 -0500, Rafael Ortiz wrote:
snip
Regarding this, one major feedback that I have from new sugar devs is
the lack of proper documentation about the Collab stack.
Improving this is critical.
+1
Jerry
___
Excerpts from Ajay Garg's message of 2012-02-20 06:57:33 +0100:
Earlier, the Registration failed message seemed more like a threat.
The new message sounds more like an information-conveying one.
[...]
I don't see any improvement over the previous patch [1] that would
address the concerns I had
Hi Sascha,
I had previously mentioned looking at the combination of your Backup (v5)
and Restore (v4) Activities in order to facilitate the upgrades of the XOs
at the Austrian pilot project. While time constraints unfortunately kept me
from going ahead with the OS upgrades of all the children's
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 12-02-17 at 05:33am, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
better news: i've just confirmed that:
a) the removal of js_push_context and pop context was a spurious
error, those functions are now restored, confirmed as
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit2
ok: one of the issues that i ran into on the original (flawed)
webkit-gobject development work, as well as the ports of pythonwebkit
to gtk and directfb, was quite how integrated the whole thing had to
be. there are now something like *eight* separate language
9 matches
Mail list logo
