http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit2
ok: one of the issues that i ran into on the original (flawed)
webkit-gobject development work, as well as the ports of pythonwebkit
to gtk and directfb, was quite how integrated the whole thing had to
be. there are now something like *eight* separate language
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-02-17 at 05:33am, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> better news: i've just confirmed that:
>>
>> a) the removal of js_push_context and pop context was a spurious
>> error, those functions are now restored, confirmed as compil
Hi Sascha,
I had previously mentioned looking at the combination of your Backup (v5)
and Restore (v4) Activities in order to facilitate the upgrades of the XOs
at the Austrian pilot project. While time constraints unfortunately kept me
from going ahead with the OS upgrades of all the children's XO
Excerpts from Ajay Garg's message of 2012-02-20 06:57:33 +0100:
> Earlier, the "Registration failed" message seemed more like a threat.
> The new message sounds more like an information-conveying one.
[...]
I don't see any improvement over the previous patch [1] that would
address the concerns I
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 11:10 -0500, Rafael Ortiz wrote:
>
>
< snip >
>
>
> Regarding this, one major feedback that I have from new sugar devs is
> the lack of proper documentation about the Collab stack.
> Improving this is critical.
>
+1
Jerry
_
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Schampijer writes:
>
> > is this [1] the latest version of the Sugar docs? What is the current
> > process for updates (e.g. the upcoming 0.96). Is there someone working on
> > that end? There were questions here at the GNOME
Hi Simon,
Simon Schampijer writes:
> is this [1] the latest version of the Sugar docs? What is the current
> process for updates (e.g. the upcoming 0.96). Is there someone working on
> that end? There were questions here at the GNOME doc hackfest [2] what
> Sugar is doing for documentation and I
Hi,
there have been recent work on theming in GTK+.
From the raleigh theme (the default theme that gets used if you did not
apply a theme or loading failed) some default settings have been removed
(like default background color and a default padding) [1][2].
As well the a11y-base.css [3] has
Hi,
is this [1] the latest version of the Sugar docs? What is the current
process for updates (e.g. the upcoming 0.96). Is there someone working
on that end? There were questions here at the GNOME doc hackfest [2]
what Sugar is doing for documentation and I am not sure if I am fully up
to dat
9 matches
Mail list logo