Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Request for Sweets Distribution logo

2012-06-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:34:02PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all! > > > The Sweets Distribution [1], is a repository with base software > (for client side, it is Sucrose) for Sugar Learning Platform. > > There is no exact need in having logo, but there is a Control Panel > component which i

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release SocialCalcActivity-6

2012-06-11 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4084 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.92 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28113/socialcalcactivity-6.xo Release notes: * It's possible to save and open files with the symbol : * Larger icons in the Edit menu * One inter

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to have the nick-colors take effect in a svg-icon?

2012-06-11 Thread Ajay Garg
Anish did it ! Steps required :: a) Save the image as a "plain" inkscape image. (if not already). b) Fill in the required "stroke_color" and "fill_color". c) Remove 'opacity' related attributes. For reference, I am attaching the original-inkscape-not-working file, the plain-inkscape-n

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Jam2Jam-4

2012-06-11 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4290 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.96 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28112/jam2jam-4.xo Release notes: Fixed for Sugar version 0.94 Fixed to work on XO 1.5. New toolbar for new Sugar versions 0.86+. Improvements in

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release GoGoNews-1.1

2012-06-11 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4580 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.96 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28111/gogonews-1.1.xo Release notes: - News Update hanging bug fixed - Show first article from the list when selecting Category. - Font size adju

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar] Create a default unencrypted keyring, OLPC #10290

2012-06-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
Follow-up: Upstream seem to work on the possibility to use the XDG dirs, so one can specify an alternative path. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613644 Thanks to Marco for pointing that out, Simon On 04/16/2012 12:33 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: This patch does create an ununcryp

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Hmm, are you bored? :) I can find tasks to both of you don't force me . Gonzalo On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Manuel Quiñones > wrote: > >> 2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : > >>> Hello guys, > >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > I mean, if you have a ticket for the issue in question you can attach > to it, or paste in the email directly, because fpastes are temporal > (as far as I can tell). Yes, you are right. Thanks. -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog: http://humitos.wo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: >> 2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : >>> Hello guys, >> >> Not only guys in this list, though we are majority, let's keep the >> door open for diversity :) > > It's an American English expression: > > guys [plural] Am

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: >> Is better to >> attach logs to the bug tracker. > > bugs.sugarlabs.org you mean? if "yes", where? I mean, if you have a ticket for the issue in question you can attach to it, or paste in the email directly,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote: >> This is the diff of the porting > > Gonzalo told about some .svg images on the GetBooks code. So, I > changed the get-books.cfg file to "not show images" and the activity > is working. Great you found it. Y

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > Is better to > attach logs to the bug tracker. bugs.sugarlabs.org you mean? if "yes", where? -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog: http://humitos.wordpress.com/ Porfolio: http://fotos.mkaufmann.com.ar/ PyAr: http://www.python.com.ar/ ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : >> Hello guys, > > Not only guys in this list, though we are majority, let's keep the > door open for diversity :) It's an American English expression: guys [plural] AmE spoken, used when talking to or about a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : > Hello guys, > > I'm porting Get Books to Gtk3 and I found an error that I don't know > how to fix (I'm dealing with a lot of errors that I'm commenting on > the code to have at least the home of the activity). > > These are the errors that I get when I run Get Books >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2012/6/11 Manuel Kaufmann : > Hello guys, Not only guys in this list, though we are majority, let's keep the door open for diversity :) -- .. manuq .. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote: > This is the diff of the porting Gonzalo told about some .svg images on the GetBooks code. So, I changed the get-books.cfg file to "not show images" and the activity is working. Thanks, -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog: http://humitos.wordpress.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote: > I'm porting Get Books to Gtk3 This is the diff of the porting http://fpaste.org/EbP3/ -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog: http://humitos.wordpress.com/ Porfolio: http://fotos.mkaufmann.com.ar/ PyAr: http://www.python.com.ar/ _

Re: [Sugar-devel] [REMINDER] Development team meeting --- 05. June 2012 (15:00 UTC)

2012-06-11 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 2012-06-11, at 16:16, Walter Bender wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bert Freudenberg >> wrote: >>> On 2012-06-11, at 15:15, Walter Bender wrote: In Amazonas last week, I had the teachers use the Duplicate feature to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Manuel Kaufmann wrote: >  * from the Terminal Activity: http://fpaste.org/LemM/ I don't know why the above link doesn't work. So, I pasted it again http://fpaste.org/eZPO/ -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog: http://humitos.wordpress.com/ Porfolio: http://fotos.mkaufmann.

[Sugar-devel] Porting get-books to Gtk3

2012-06-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
Hello guys, I'm porting Get Books to Gtk3 and I found an error that I don't know how to fix (I'm dealing with a lot of errors that I'm commenting on the code to have at least the home of the activity). These are the errors that I get when I run Get Books * from the Terminal Activity: http://fpa

Re: [Sugar-devel] [REMINDER] Development team meeting --- 05. June 2012 (15:00 UTC)

2012-06-11 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 2012-06-11, at 16:16, Walter Bender wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bert Freudenberg > wrote: >> On 2012-06-11, at 15:15, Walter Bender wrote: >>> In Amazonas last week, I had the teachers use the Duplicate feature to >>> clone an activity (in this specific case, Labyrinth) so that

Re: [Sugar-devel] [REMINDER] Development team meeting --- 05. June 2012 (15:00 UTC)

2012-06-11 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 2012-06-11, at 15:15, Walter Bender wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> >>> - developing Activities on the XO: maybe we should include git in the builds >>> to start with (at least on the 1.5 and 1.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [REMINDER] Development team meeting --- 05. June 2012 (15:00 UTC)

2012-06-11 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 2012-06-11, at 15:15, Walter Bender wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> - developing Activities on the XO: maybe we should include git in the builds >> to start with (at least on the 1.5 and 1.75)? the rpm with the deps >> (perl-Error + perl-Git) is 3.2MB,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-06-10

2012-06-11 Thread Yamandu Ploskonka
oh my dear Walter... I must apologize. I thought my track record was clear enough, at least with you, that I would not be understood to consider Windows "real software", unless it were as a parody/sarcasm. My bad. I hope that the lesson is learned, and that going forward I will tag things bette

Re: [Sugar-devel] [REMINDER] Development team meeting --- 05. June 2012 (15:00 UTC)

2012-06-11 Thread Walter Bender
Just getting caught up after a week in Chachapoyas. On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Oups, it should have been the Tuesday the 5th! > > On 06/04/2012 06:08 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> tomorrow we will have our weekly development team meeting after a few >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-06-10

2012-06-11 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote: > Hope you are recuperating from such fun :-) > > Question, > are these teacher using XOs as *their* primary tool to access internet, > Facebook, etc? I don't know. I did not see any teacher use any other computer all week. But that said,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-06-10

2012-06-11 Thread Yamandu Ploskonka
Hope you are recuperating from such fun :-) Question, are these teacher using XOs as *their* primary tool to access internet, Facebook, etc? That would be, IMNSHO, enormously meaningful in their "buy in". The XO is either a real tool, or else perceived as a "toy" vs. the real tool that is us