Presumably with the standard multi-touch X support, which is landing
in Linux all over. That's how the XO-3 worked, at least, although
that was traditional capacitive touch; I don't think there's an actual
Neonode driver in existence anywhere yet.
--scott
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Bert F
On 26.07.2012, at 20:21, Mike Lee wrote:
> Here's a cool demo of the Neonode multitouch frame:
>
> http://www.slashgear.com/neonode-3d-touch-headed-to-tablets-and-phones-hands-on-28215933/
>
> Not only multi-touch, but also entry direction and tilt. For a dollar!
Well, for tilt you would need
Hi all.
Just a gentle reminder :)
Or, at least a status update will be highly appreciated :)
Thanks and Regards,
Ajay
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Kindly review the patch, so that progress may be made in pushing this :)
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Ajay
>
>
>
On 27 Jul 2012, at 18:30, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Let's try Tuesday at the slightly later time of 16:30 UTC. The plan is to
> keep the meeting to 1 hour, or under, and use our realtime meeting to keep
> the various design efforts ticking over and everyone who is interested up to
Hi Martin,
On 31 Jul 2012, at 15:54, Martin Abente wrote:
> Hello:
>
> One of the connections in my flight got moved so I won't be able to assist to
> this meeting ;/
>
> Regarding the examples objects support, I would appreciate feedback on
> possible designs for this feature i,e: if we sho
Hello:
One of the connections in my flight got moved so I won't be able to assist
to this meeting ;/
Regarding the examples objects support, I would appreciate feedback on
possible designs for this feature i,e: if we should use an special toolbar
button to access this screen or not (?), how this
I behaved as jamedia to gtk3 and added to part of mplayer as backend,
implemented on gstreamer player 1.0:
https://sites.google.com/site/sugaractivities/jamediaobjects/jam
With gstreamer 0.10 I could not work.
Surely you can make it work corriengo 0.10 gst subprocess through but that
would be very
On 07/31/2012 10:33 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Any chance of have it packaged in F17?
Should do developing, but more important testing, easier.
I'm not sure, it's something that could be investigated as in theory
it's suppose to be paralle
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Any chance of have it packaged in F17?
> Should do developing, but more important testing, easier.
I'm not sure, it's something that could be investigated as in theory
it's suppose to be parallel installable, whether it's parallel
runnable
9 matches
Mail list logo
