[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Abiword v2.9.4 released

fyi -- Forwarded message -- From: Simon Larochelle Date: Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:23 PM Subject: Abiword v2.9.4 released To: abiword-dev , abiword-u...@abisource.com AbiWord v2.9.4 is the fifth public development release towards the next stable AbiWord version, AbiWord v3.0.0. We

Re: [Sugar-devel] [OLPC-AU] Harmonising network proxy settings

On 22 November 2012 20:41, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan > wrote: > Is there any reason why you can't use a transparent proxy on the > network edge which will mean its all configured and controlled from a > central location rather than through individ

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build "make build-sugar-artwork" and quad-core compilation

On 26 November 2012 20:21, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > No, I think it's generally useful, switching directories especially > with out-of-source builds is a bit annoying. I'm pretty happy with > build-* and pull-*, I will add those. I added this along with another couple of changes. * "make build" on

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build "make build-sugar-artwork" and quad-core compilation

On 26 November 2012 20:16, Manuel Kaufmann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> But did you use it to build your own changes or changes someone made >> to the repo? Or both? > > I'm not sure if I used it for both. > > I used it before knowing "auto-install". I mean,

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build "make build-sugar-artwork" and quad-core compilation

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > But did you use it to build your own changes or changes someone made > to the repo? Or both? I'm not sure if I used it for both. I used it before knowing "auto-install". I mean, I made a change on some .py file and I ran "make build-sugar"

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build "make build-sugar-artwork" and quad-core compilation

On 26 November 2012 19:26, Manuel Kaufmann wrote: > It seems to be a shortcut for do what you described here. > > 1. make shell > 2. cd source/sugar > 3. make > 4. make install But did you use it to build your own changes or changes someone made to the repo? Or both? I'm not sure it's possib

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build "make build-sugar-artwork" and quad-core compilation

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > can you explain how you are using it exactly? I didn't readd it when I > rewrote things because I was not very clear on the use case (I > normally just make; make install stuff inside a shell). $ make build-sugar -> just compile and install

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-25

On 26 November 2012 15:58, Samy Boutayeb wrote: > Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 15:36 +0100, Daniel Narvaez a écrit : >> On 26 November 2012 02:34, Daniel Francis wrote: >> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:43:35 -0500 >> > Walter Bender wrote: >> >> 3. Daniel Narvaez has made a number of improvements to s

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build "make build-sugar-artwork" and quad-core compilation

the current sugar-build implementation? That's supposed to just work grep "make -j 8" logs/build-20121126-153309.log | wc -l 19 If it doesn't work for you, can you see what this gives: python -c "import multiprocessing; print multiprocessing.cpu_count()" __

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Adding support for other distributions

Hello, I streamlined a bit the process of adding a new distribution and wrote some documentation about it. http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/sugar-docs/build.html#adding-a-new-distribution As it was discussed in the "Sugar Digest" thread, it would be awesome to support more distributions, but we ne

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

Hi Gary, Gary Martin writes: > Aha, OK. So my first guess would be that the SOAS image is probably missing > some dependency shipped in an OLPC build (or in a deployments customised > build) that this activity depends on. I've not used this particular > activity before (I try to use Sugar with t

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build "make build-sugar-artwork" and quad-core compilation

Hi, Sometime ago I used to run: make build-sugar-artwork to just re-compile sugar-artwork. Nowadays that is not more possible. Any clue here? Another issue is that I was able to set "-j 8" to make and use more than one CPU to compile all sources. Is there any way to do that in the current sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

Hi Bastien, On 26 Nov 2012, at 14:58, Bastien wrote: > Hi Gary, > > thanks for your answer. > > Gary Martin writes: > >> Yes, http://activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO) picks up the browser >> client string from Browse that varies from Sugar release to Sugar >> release, and shows the latest Acti

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Notice to GCI mentors

Chris, I don't think it will be possible for me to spend much time in IRC. I am pretty good replying to email at this address. I have it open in a tab all day at work. I can also do Skype calls in the evenings. James Simmons On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Chris Leonard wrote: > Also, > > P

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

Hi Gary, thanks for your answer. Gary Martin writes: > Yes, http://activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO) picks up the browser > client string from Browse that varies from Sugar release to Sugar > release, and shows the latest Activity versions for that release of > Sugar. It does assume some steps a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-25

Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 15:36 +0100, Daniel Narvaez a écrit : > On 26 November 2012 02:34, Daniel Francis wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:43:35 -0500 > > Walter Bender wrote: > >> 3. Daniel Narvaez has made a number of improvements to sugar-build > >> [5], which has by-and-large replaced su

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

Chris Leonard writes: > We'll work on getting it posted as a task(s), but we will need mentors > before posting. Any vols? I can't volunteer on this. PS: I mentored 3 Google Summer of Code students for free this summer, and while I enjoyed doing this a lot, I think the model is not well suit

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Bastien wrote: > Chris Leonard writes: > >> Please write it up on the wiki and we will try to get some GCI >> contributors to work on it. >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/GoogleCodeIn2012/GCI2012_Brainstorming > > Done on the page above as (9). > > -- > Bastien

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

Hi Bastien,On 26 Nov 2012, at 07:32, Bastien wrote:Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn writes:supposedly.. when you navigate from Browse Activity, the searchs onASLO returns the latest for your sugar version..Good if it is really so.  Can someone confirm?Yes, http://act

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Notice to GCI mentors

Chris Leonard writes: > Please try to hang out in #sugar. Sorry, I don't have time. I don't even have the time to hang out on Emacs #orgmode, the project I'm maintaining. > As Luke noted, we may not have prepared adequately for the Zerg rush. > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=zerg+rush > > Click the li

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

Chris Leonard writes: > Please write it up on the wiki and we will try to get some GCI > contributors to work on it. > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/GoogleCodeIn2012/GCI2012_Brainstorming Done on the page above as (9). -- Bastien ___ Sugar-devel ma

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-25

On 26 November 2012 02:34, Daniel Francis wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:43:35 -0500 > Walter Bender wrote: >> 3. Daniel Narvaez has made a number of improvements to sugar-build >> [5], which has by-and-large replaced sugar-jhbuild as the preferred >> development environment for Fedora and Ubunt

Re: [Sugar-devel] Notice to GCI mentors

Also, Please try to hang out in #sugar. As Luke noted, we may not have prepared adequately for the Zerg rush. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=zerg+rush Click the link, trust me, you won't regret it :-) cjl On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > Dear GCI mentors for Sugar Labs, > > Fi

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Bastien wrote: > Chris Leonard writes: > >> I have found instances of bad compatibility info in ASLO. I asked the >> maintainer about it and they fixed it. > > This is also what I do. > > But we're not all hardcore geeks. Some teachers are being > frustrated by

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Abacus-43

Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4293 Sugar Platform: 0.98 - 0.98 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28367/abacus-43.xo Release notes: 43 ENHANCEMENTS * New translations * Use lockable palette (Gonzalo Odiard) Sugar Labs Activities http://act

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Bastien wrote: > > > Then maybe the compatibility info for each activity is often wrong. > > > > Does any other users have problems with compatibility? > > I have found instances of bad compatibility info in

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

Chris Leonard writes: > I have found instances of bad compatibility info in ASLO. I asked the > maintainer about it and they fixed it. This is also what I do. But we're not all hardcore geeks. Some teachers are being frustrated by this -- let's also think about "normal" users. Thanks, --

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

James Cameron writes: > I don't use activities.sugarlabs.org often enough to notice such > problems. It loads too slowly for me. Well, a.sl.o is key in distributing Sugar and Sugar activities. Any progress on it will have a great impact on a large scale. I know Bernie has been working on it, m

Re: [Sugar-devel] FR: Feature for a.sl.o: global filter by Sugar version

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:32:21AM +0100, Bastien wrote: > Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn writes: > > > supposedly.. when you navigate from Browse Activity, the searchs on > > ASLO returns the latest for your sugar version.. > > Good if it is really so. Can someone confirm? Yes, I have seen this beh