Re: [Sugar-devel] [NETWORK] Sugar Network 0.7 development release

2012-11-30 Thread James Cameron
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Network#Try_it on existing Sugar installation, install Sugar Network activity. Installing on OLPC OS 13.1.0 build 15 results in Error PyWebKitGtk is not installed. screen, and there is no exit from the screen. The activity can be stopped from the frame or home

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NETWORK] Sugar Network 0.7 development release

2012-11-30 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:37:21PM +1100, James Cameron wrote: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Network#Try_it on existing Sugar installation, install Sugar Network activity. Installing on OLPC OS 13.1.0 build 15 results in Error PyWebKitGtk is not installed. screen, and there is no exit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NETWORK] Sugar Network 0.7 development release

2012-11-30 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:05:46AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Sugar_Network#Dependencies The problem is that gevent-1.0 is not yet released, you have to install it manually from upstream site, https://github.com/SiteSupport/gevent/downloads (with

Re: [Sugar-devel] offline a.sl.o

2012-11-30 Thread Martin Abente
@sameer: What features (exactly) do you need from ASLO? IE, in Paraguay we just needed to provide a static repo of activities to feed the sugar updater. And we used this http://git.sugarlabs.org/dx-activities-server On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Dr. Gerald Ardito gerald.ard...@gmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NETWORK] Sugar Network 0.7 development release

2012-11-30 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:06:26PM +1100, James Cameron wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:05:46AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Sugar_Network#Dependencies The problem is that gevent-1.0 is not yet released, you have to install it manually from upstream

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Walter Bender
== Sugar Digest == “Believe those who seek the truth, doubt those who find it; doubt all, but do not doubt yourself.” (Croyez ceux qui cherchent la vérité, doutez de ceux qui la trouvent; doutez de tout, mais ne doutez pas de vous-même.) -André Gide It has been a very exciting week. (You may

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: == Sugar Digest == “Believe those who seek the truth, doubt those who find it; doubt all, but do not doubt yourself.” (Croyez ceux qui cherchent la vérité, doutez de ceux qui la trouvent; doutez de tout, mais ne

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-update-control PATCH 1/2] Now, the selecting/unselecting particular activities works.

2012-11-30 Thread Daniel Drake
Thanks for the patch. If you'd like to speed up the process and save me some time, please add a commit message explaining what was wrong and how/why this fixes it. It does not jump out at me from the patch. It also doesn't feel like the right place to be doing a spring cleaning of the activities

[Sugar-devel] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
questions: 1) Are there Release 13 files for testing on XO-1 I can try? As is of record, I am most concerned on how the msp430 toolkit will build. Significant issues with os 12 repositories... http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/OLPC_XO-1 2) What is the role of these 31012 builds? are they

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Yama Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote: questions: 1) Are there Release 13 files for testing on XO-1 I can try? I apologize if I was not clear. The 13.1 series is still under development. It is not a stable release and will only load on machines that have

Re: [Sugar-devel] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
If you use the parent directory, you can browse all files.. http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/ And think that the latest it's the annunced: http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os15/ I'm wrong? Regards! Alan Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:07:20 -0600 From: yamap...@gmail.com CC: i...@lists.sugarlabs.org;

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
Thank you again! maybe I got this wrong. what happens is that I do not understand the nature of the os## folder names, and, bottom line, how can I help most to get the repositories right this time for the msp430 toolchain. I can test with XO-1 with dev key. If I get right the meaning of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
sorry, certified ignoramus here, I got it (I hope...). The spins are the updated build, as developers upload their bestest and latest. So, if I test, I should test spin os15 (or later, as things move along) AND those numbers have nothing to do with OLPC OS releases. Thanks! On 11/30/2012

Re: [Sugar-devel] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Yama Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote: 2) What is the role of these 31012 builds? are they meant as an official update? are they undergoing further testing? In short, should I point people to those instead of to the 21021? The naming scheme is described

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
thank you, Daniel, I was confused between build, spin, OLPC version, Fedora version I guess I got it now, and I should test, for example, build 12 of version 13... as being the lates6t /announced/ for XO-1 There are newer builds (like build 15), but from your note I infer I should not use

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread James Simmons
I am wondering if I did the best possible job setting up my tasks for the Google code-in. Judging from http://www.google-melange.com/gci/dashboard/google/gci2012#all_org_tasks it looks like lots of small tasks are most attractive to potential students. I wrote up a little page explaining some

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Walter Bender
Perhaps we could break the editing update into chapters. -walter On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:44 PM, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: I am wondering if I did the best possible job setting up my tasks for the Google code-in. Judging from

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-update-control PATCH 1/2] Now, the selecting/unselecting particular activities works.

2012-11-30 Thread Ajay Garg
Daniel, I agree that the reason of applying this particular fix is not very well explained, but this was the best that worked, without breaking anything else. To put it logically, once the list is rendered, we do not need any not-updatable activity entries anyway; also the only next step after

Re: [Sugar-devel] offline a.sl.o

2012-11-30 Thread Sameer Verma
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: @sameer: What features (exactly) do you need from ASLO? IE, in Paraguay we just needed to provide a static repo of activities to feed the sugar updater. And we used this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread James Simmons
Walter, This was my write-up: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/GoogleCodeIn2012/MYOSA I had eight sub-tasks in there, which included proposals for new chapters and a couple of suggestions for the existing chapters, mostly involving GTK3 porting. I thought giving students the option of making their

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Walter Bender
I'll make it into eight separate tasks... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:16 PM, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: Walter, This was my write-up: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/GoogleCodeIn2012/MYOSA I had eight sub-tasks in there, which included proposals for new chapters and a couple of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NETWORK] Sugar Network 0.7 development release

2012-11-30 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:43:58AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: Looks like there is a race (sugar-network-client was spawned but not yet started listening for connections). Try to add time.sleep(3) to /home/olpc/Activities/SugarNetwork.activity/activity.py:87. Tried sleep(3) and sleep(5), no

[Sugar-devel] Trouble building sugarlabs

2012-11-30 Thread John Kim
Hello, My name is John Kim, and I'm interested in coding for sugar development. I'm trying to build sugar with the make command, and I seem to be having trouble. I am following the Building from sources from the Sugar Documentation. I first cloned sugar-build.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Trouble building sugarlabs

2012-11-30 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
Hi, What distribution you are using? Fedora?You make a git pull recently?It's this your latest commit: a04756c244b618776bbc8f6a417799e82da0de05 ? The error seems a encode problem.. Alan Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 21:21:53 -0800 From: thinkn...@gmail.com To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [NETWORK] Sugar Network 0.7 development release

2012-11-30 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 03:18:00PM +1100, James Cameron wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:43:58AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: Looks like there is a race (sugar-network-client was spawned but not yet started listening for connections). Try to add time.sleep(3) to

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build run error

2012-11-30 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
I think that in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu you can get more answers that in the bugzilla.. Maybe, fill another bug on that? --- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:25:56 +

Re: [Sugar-devel] Trouble building sugarlabs

2012-11-30 Thread John Kim
I tried this, but it still doesn't work. It still gives me errors. If possible, I would like to lose every trace of sugar-build in the system, or simply, uninstall it. Maybe then, after I run make again, it should work. How can I do this? John Kim 2012/11/30 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn

Re: [Sugar-devel] Trouble building sugarlabs

2012-11-30 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
What error have now? For reset mi change: git reset --hard Remove all untracked files: git clean -xdf and, maybe: make clean And try again.. Alan Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:31:12 -0800 Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Trouble building sugarlabs From: thinkn...@gmail.com To: alan...@hotmail.com;

[Sugar-devel] SVG Research task for GCI

2012-11-30 Thread Alexandro Colorado
I want to get a clearer look on what we expect from the candidate on the following GCI task: http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/8016213 Since this has to do with research paper would we need any specific template on how to present the idea, quote sources and develop test

Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG Research task for GCI

2012-11-30 Thread Chris Leonard
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: I want to get a clearer look on what we expect from the candidate on the following GCI task: http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/8016213 I drafted that. Since this has to do with research paper

Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG Research task for GCI

2012-11-30 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
there are a lot of ways.. see the code attached to obtain the strings.. use: python get_svg_text.py dibujo.svg From: cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 01:59:52 -0500 To: j...@oooes.org CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG Research task for GCI On