Thanks for clarifying Sebastian. I prefer discussions to polls to
make decisions (and a poll would be not binding anyway) but I'm not against
a poll if people think it's necessary.
On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Sebastian Silva wrote:
Hi,
The poll winner was GPLv3 but the poll was non-binding,
Cool. Maybe since you are talking to the SFC already you could ask how to
get the contributors permission? I wonder if the mailing list should be
cced for example, so that we get a record of it.
On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Walter Bender wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for clarifying Sebastian. I prefer discussions to polls to make
decisions (and a poll would be not binding anyway) but I'm not against a
poll if people think it's necessary.
FWIW, the poll was only taken after a
Let me sum up where I think we are and what questions we have for
Tony/Bradley at SFC:
(1) We have some of the core Sugar code still under LGPLv2 (e.g.,
sugar-artwork) which we would like to change to LGPLv3.
(2) We would like to add a second (Apache) license to this same code.
s there a
On 8 June 2013 13:09, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me sum up where I think we are and what questions we have for
Tony/Bradley at SFC:
(1) We have some of the core Sugar code still under LGPLv2 (e.g.,
sugar-artwork) which we would like to change to LGPLv3.
(2) We would
Just checked. I don't have access to make releases. Could you please re-add
me?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think I can add you to the activity on ASLO, which
Just added you to StarChart
-walter
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Aneesh Dogra lionane...@gmail.com wrote:
Just checked. I don't have access to make releases. Could you please re-add
me?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013
It's pretty bad that js-beautify doesn't have a proper max line length
option. I
opened a bug about it
https://github.com/einars/js-beautify/issues/284
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Hey Daniel,
I also find odd the files tab in our docs, and also I miss a link to
the index. I would take this approach:
- remove the files tab for markdown files in the root folder, use
the headings sidebar without the headings title.
- have a back to index link on top of the sidebar, that
Sounds good! I'll see if I can figure out a way to upstream it, otherwise
we will have to patch our fork, not a big problem I think.
On 8 June 2013 15:51, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Hey Daniel,
I also find odd the files tab in our docs, and also I miss a link to
the index. I
2013/6/8 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
It's pretty bad that js-beautify doesn't have a proper max line length
option. I
opened a bug about it
https://github.com/einars/js-beautify/issues/284
Good. Except for this bug, I think js-beautify does a very nice job
for JavaScript code. For
Yeah would be good to file bugs. The maintainer is quite responsive.
On 8 June 2013 16:02, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/6/8 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
It's pretty bad that js-beautify doesn't have a proper max line length
option. I
opened a bug about it
2013/6/8 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Yeah would be good to file bugs. The maintainer is quite responsive.
https://github.com/einars/js-beautify/issues/285
--
.. manuq ..
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
The index link can also be inside a site header, which can be
consistently in every page of the developer site. We can use this
image:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/e/e2/Join_Developer_BW.png
Can also be the favicon :)
2013/6/8 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Sounds good! I'll see if
On 8 June 2013 17:11, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
The index link can also be inside a site header, which can be
consistently in every page of the developer site. We can use this
image:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/e/e2/Join_Developer_BW.png
Can also be the favicon :)
The
On 06/07/2013 09:10 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
No, just glucose. You can see the exact list of modules on
https://github.com/sugarlabs/
By the way, what is sugarlabs, a shared account?
Wouldn't this subvert GitHub's philosophy that all forks are created
equal, by creating one that looks more
16 matches
Mail list logo
