On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> The problem with upgrading pootle is not only our lack of knowledge
> about how internally works, but also the modifications already done.
> Then, nobody really knows how much time will take a upgrade,
> and what is the work involved.
>
> The only way I see this proposal can be better if we have a collection of
> icons
> easily identifiable with the xo icon kid, like adding a football ball, or
> dancing, painting, and so,
> and with the entities defined to preserve the user colors.
>
>
Just to explore this idea, and knowing I am n
Please, keep this discussion polite.
What you say can be accepted in other communities,
but is not the way sugarlabs/olpc community communicate.
The problem with upgrading pootle is not only our lack of knowledge
about how internally works, but also the modifications already done.
Then, nobody rea
Now I see that there was another thread and you received a lot of responses.
2013/6/18 Manuel Quiñones :
> Hi,
>
> I think the miss of responses to this email provoked your rant, so
> I'll try to answer:
>
> 2013/2/9 outro pessoa :
>> It seems- and why not- that the system- Sugar, that is- is enti
Hi,
I think the miss of responses to this email provoked your rant, so
I'll try to answer:
2013/2/9 outro pessoa :
> It seems- and why not- that the system- Sugar, that is- is entirely a Linux
> project. Is there any way possible that I could build each individual
> module such as desktop, termin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, outro pessoa wrote:
> You want help translating yet you are not willing to help someone in
> porting to a different system.
> To me, you sound like a bunch of hypocrites.
>
>
No we are all just a bunch of over-worked volunteers. Developers and
Translators have en
Huh? What are you talking about? :)
On Tuesday, 18 June 2013, outro pessoa wrote:
> You want help translating yet you are not willing to help someone in
> porting to a different system.
> To me, you sound like a bunch of hypocrites.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Daniel Narvaez
>
> > wr
You want help translating yet you are not willing to help someone in
porting to a different system.
To me, you sound like a bunch of hypocrites.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> What is the problem with github exactly? I thought we already switched
> over to the new repo
in my weekend I played a bit with the CSS of sugar-web, to see how
very few lines of CSS can improve the theme. See:
http://dev.laptop.org/~manuq/theme-refresh.png
Just some shadows and softer borders in the palette, work nice with
our simple theme, enhancing it (in my opinion).
Note that I don
On 18 June 2013 18:19, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Daniel Narvaez wrote at 14:53 (EDT) on Monday:
> > I made a list of contributors. I'm not sure what's the best way to
> > collect permission though. For example, should we email the
> > contributors keeping a list in cc so that we have a public reco
Daniel Narvaez wrote at 14:53 (EDT) on Monday:
> I made a list of contributors. I'm not sure what's the best way to
> collect permission though. For example, should we email the
> contributors keeping a list in cc so that we have a public record?
You don't necessarily need a public record. It's r
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> This file hasn't changed.
> Worked before?
>
>
When I built it locally and rpmlint resulted the error, but when I build it
in koji, the issue was not there. Anyway Maze 24 has been submitted for
testing in fedora stable repos. Sorry for the
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
>
>
When I built it locally and rpmlint resulted the error, but when I build it
in koji, the issue was not there. Anyway Labyrinth 15 has been submitted
for testing in fedora stable rep
I pushed a fix which should avoid this situation in the future. Please keep
reporting any issue you find!
On 18 June 2013 10:35, suraj ks wrote:
> Everything seemed to be working fine yesterday.
>
> But today morning when i try to run I get this,
>
> [osbuild sugar-build]$ run
>
> = Building =
The situation with Xephyr in generally is pretty sad. It's buggy and pretty
much unmaintained. It's supposed to be replaced by xf86-video-nested, which
was published a couple of years ago but doesn't seem to have made it to any
distribution yet (and doesn't seem to be actively developed either).
W
Now it looks like it is alright after trying to clean and build.
FYI. I use Ubuntu 13.04
Thanks Daniel.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Yeah because Xephyr is not used when running from gdm.
>
> Even with sugar-build if you run from a text console it will use full X
>
Yeah because Xephyr is not used when running from gdm.
Even with sugar-build if you run from a text console it will use full X
instead of Xephyr.
On Tuesday, 18 June 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
> Mm, the problem is sugar-emulator running in terminal or launch the
> aplication.
>
> If you run
Mm, the problem is sugar-emulator running in terminal or launch the
aplication.
If you run it from gdm it's work ok..
The problem is Ubuntu 13.10 :-/
I test it later in Lubuntu 13.10
Grettings.
Ignacio
2013/6/18 Daniel Narvaez
> I would report it to launchpad too. Might be an ubuntu specifi
This file hasn't changed.
Worked before?
Gonzalo
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Sugar Labs Activities <
> activit...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>
>> Activity Homepage:
>> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4071
>>
>> Sugar Plat
I would report it to launchpad too. Might be an ubuntu specific issue. Also
Xephyr is sort of unmaintaned upstream.
On 18 June 2013 11:51, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote:
> Reported: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65887
>
> My explain it's very basic.. if someone can explain more,
Reported: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65887
My explain it's very basic.. if someone can explain more, thanks!
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:34:56 +0200
From: dwnarv...@gmail.com
To: alan...@hotmail.com; nachoe...@gmail.com
CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; suraj.gilles...@gmail.com
I suggested to Ignacio to report it but I don't know if he did (ccing him).
On 18 June 2013 11:33, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote:
> Yes :-(
> It's problem of my distro (Ubuntu 13.10).
>
> The error was reported??
>
> --
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:30:34 +0200
>
> Fr
Yes :-(It's problem of my distro (Ubuntu 13.10).
The error was reported??
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:30:34 +0200
From: dwnarv...@gmail.com
To: alan...@hotmail.com
CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; suraj.gilles...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build break
Ignacio reported something
Ignacio reported something similar and it appeared to be an Ubuntu bug. Try
to run "Xephyr :10" and see if that also crashes, if so it's a Xephyr bug
in your distro.
On 18 June 2013 11:25, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote:
> That error appears only one time.. after a clean.. now builds all withou
On 18 June 2013 11:07, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> It should have automatically cleaned it like you can see it's doing with
> webkit in the log. I can't quite understand why it didn't do so with
> node... It works for me if I revert and reapply that change. Hmmm...
>
Probably at some point changes t
To fix it
./osbuild clean node
It should have automatically cleaned it like you can see it's doing with
webkit in the log. I can't quite understand why it didn't do so with
node... It works for me if I revert and reapply that change. Hmmm...
On 18 June 2013 10:35, suraj ks wrote:
> Everything
Can you send your build/logs/main.log to me?
On 18 June 2013 10:38, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote:
> I get the same error.. but after a "deep clean" it pass the node build..
> "deep clean":
>
> git clean -xdf
> git reset --hard
> ./osbuild clean
>
> But it gives me another error:
>
> Exception
I get the same error.. but after a "deep clean" it pass the node build.."deep
clean":
git clean -xdfgit reset --hard./osbuild clean
But it gives me another error:
Exception in thread Thread-57:Traceback (most recent call last): File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 808, in __bootstrap_inn
Everything seemed to be working fine yesterday.
But today morning when i try to run I get this,
[osbuild sugar-build]$ run
= Building =
* Cleaning webkitgtk
* Building node
Command failed: make install
make -C out BUILDTYPE=Release V=1
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/suraj/sugar-build/node
What is the problem with github exactly? I thought we already switched over
to the new repositories.
On Tuesday, 18 June 2013, Chris Leonard wrote:
> Dear Sugar Developers,
>
> The Translation Team is in desperate need of help to catch up with the
> development workflow.
>
> 1) We need to migrate
30 matches
Mail list logo
