Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4197
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.100
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28668/measure-46.xo
Release notes:
Add support for sensors on XO 4
New translations
Sugar Labs Activities
http://activities.sugarlabs.org
__
Hi,
Copying Fredrico, Pablo, as they are most up to date with Dextrose
development status.
Best,
Anish
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Walter was mentioning that dextrose tickets are not tracked on
> bugs.sugarlabs.org anymore. Though there are still a ton o
Hello,
Walter was mentioning that dextrose tickets are not tracked on
bugs.sugarlabs.org anymore. Though there are still a ton of bugs open
there... Has they been migrated? Can we delete the components?
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Su
I enabled this for the sugar module so we can give it a try before enabling
it for all the modules. Just remember to put "Fix #ticketnumber" in the log.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar
https://github.com/davglass/github-trac/issues/10
Let's see if they answer/fix, otherwise I can probably fix it properly and
send a pull request.
On 30 June 2013 03:23, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Pressed send too early
>
> https://github.com/davglass/github-trac/blob/master/github/hook.py
>
> The
Pressed send too early
https://github.com/davglass/github-trac/blob/master/github/hook.py
The simplest way is to put
Fix #1675 in the log. That will close the bug. I enabled and test this
already with sugar-build. There is a bug in trac-github but should be
simple to fix, I just worked around fo
I take that back. Documentation for this is horrible, the code on the other
hand...
On 30 June 2013 02:14, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> We can configure a comment template. If it finds that in the changelog, it
> asks trac to close the ticket.
>
> https://github.com/davglass/github-trac/
>
>
> On 3
We can configure a comment template. If it finds that in the changelog, it
asks trac to close the ticket.
https://github.com/davglass/github-trac/
On 30 June 2013 02:09, Walter Bender wrote:
> Sounds good. How does it work?
>
> -walter
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wro
Thanks
Will be a great help to activity developers too.
Gonzalo
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think the use of sugar3 in sugar-activity makes it very easy to break
> gtk activities, as we have seen. So I put back gtk2 support and, more
> importantly,
Sounds good. How does it work?
-walter
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems like we could easily close trac tickets on github pushes. I think
> we should do it, many bugs are left opened despite being fixed. Thoughts?
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
> __
Hey,
could someone with chanserv access give this command
/msg chanserv set #channelname mlock -n
Or well, give me access and I can do it.
This is for github commits notification witout the bot joining every time.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel m
Hello,
it seems like we could easily close trac tickets on github pushes. I think
we should do it, many bugs are left opened despite being fixed. Thoughts?
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.suga
On 29/06/13 09:47, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 28 June 2013 23:39, Gonzalo Odiard mailto:gonz...@laptop.org>> wrote:
If obscure, probably had sense to who fill it,
and maintainer at the time.
Should be better ask for more information and status in the same ticket.
It surely made sense
I am happy to help.
Gonzalo
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 28 June 2013 23:39, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> If obscure, probably had sense to who fill it,
>> and maintainer at the time.
>> Should be better ask for more information and status in the same ticket.
>>
WOW!
Great news
Gonzalo
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an instance of trac upgraded to 1.0.1 here
>
> http://bugs-testing.sugarlabs.org/
>
> I would appreciate some testing, especially if you have special
> functionalities you depend on (moderati
If you find any issue please let me know.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
The bulk of the migration seems solid enough that I will go ahead migrating
the real instance. If there are bugs with the plugins we can quickly fix
them out as we find them.
On 29 June 2013 20:03, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an instance of trac upgraded to 1.0.1 here
>
> http://b
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 06/29/2013 01:23 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> sudo doesn't seem to work, or am I supposed to get root in another way?
Try now, I added you to adm and admin. For historic reasons sunjammer
does not use group 'sudo', like other Ubuntu systems do.
--
_ // Bernie Innocenti
\X/ http://codewiz.or
Hello,
I have an instance of trac upgraded to 1.0.1 here
http://bugs-testing.sugarlabs.org/
I would appreciate some testing, especially if you have special
functionalities you depend on (moderation for example).
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mail
Updated the wiki page, upgrade is pretty easy now :)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi,
Content bundles have long been both a crucial part of the OLPC-Sugar
offering, and a pain through having some deficiencies.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Creating_a_collection
They are important because it is the only easy way for a deployment to
add pre-made content to Sugar (e.g. books). The st
sudo doesn't seem to work, or am I supposed to get root in another way?
On 29 June 2013 18:44, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 29 June 2013 18:13, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>
>> On 06/29/2013 09:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> > Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless.
>>
>> Awesome! Fo
On 29 June 2013 18:13, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 06/29/2013 09:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless.
>
> Awesome! For posterity, could you document the upgrade procedure in the
> service page?
>
Yes
> Also, if you'd like to support bugs.suga
Hello,
I think the use of sugar3 in sugar-activity makes it very easy to break gtk
activities, as we have seen. So I put back gtk2 support and, more
importantly, I'm smoketesting gtk2 turtleart. Next time we break gtk2
activities badly we should notice.
--
Daniel Narvaez
On 06/29/2013 09:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless.
Awesome! For posterity, could you document the upgrade procedure in the
service page?
Also, if you'd like to support bugs.sugarlabs.org, set yourself as the
primary admin contact in the wiki. Yo
This is fixed now.
On 29 June 2013 16:59, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> As discussed on irc, it seems the only approach here is somehow refactor
> code to avoid the gi import in sugar-activity. Fragile, but there is
> probably no better alternative.
>
>
> On 29 June 2013 16:30, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Here you are
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.99.2.tar.xz
Thanks for reporting this!
On 29 June 2013 11:55, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is the first development relea
As discussed on irc, it seems the only approach here is somehow refactor
code to avoid the gi import in sugar-activity. Fragile, but there is
probably no better alternative.
On 29 June 2013 16:30, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 29 June 2013 16:20, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4
On 29 June 2013 16:20, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > see this bug for a log
> >
> > http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4527
> >
> > sugar-activity imports sugar3 stuff, so far that didn't cause gi to be
> > imported I think, but with Daniel chan
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> see this bug for a log
>
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4527
>
> sugar-activity imports sugar3 stuff, so far that didn't cause gi to be
> imported I think, but with Daniel changes that's now the case.
I didn't change bundlebuilder and I
Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless. There are broken
permissions in the eggs and attachments directories though, the group
cannot write on some of the files. Can you either fix those up or give me
root?
On 29 June 2013 14:13, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Actually maybe on -testing
Actually maybe on -testing, -devel seems for trunk.
On 29 June 2013 14:12, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if
> there are blockers.
>
>
> On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>
>> On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote
Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if
there are blockers.
On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar
> > core bug tracki
On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar
> core bug tracking state and practices and as part of that effort I think
> it might make sense to upgrade to 1.0.
That would be great.
> Is the only reason we didn
On 28 June 2013 23:39, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> If obscure, probably had sense to who fill it,
> and maintainer at the time.
> Should be better ask for more information and status in the same ticket.
>
> I was closing tickets with old milestones in the last weeks.
> My criteria was:
> * Check if t
Hello,
see this bug for a log
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4527
sugar-activity imports sugar3 stuff, so far that didn't cause gi to be
imported I think, but with Daniel changes that's now the case.
I'm not sure what's the right solution here. A sugar-activity-gtk3 would
have perhaps been th
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the first development release of the cycle that will bring us to
> 0.100.
>
> Highlights:
>
> * Comments box in the journal
> * Integration with web services
> * Background customization
> * Initial support for web activit
Hmm, probably a sequence of mistakes from myself :)
I moved all to
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
Gonzalo
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> Just a heads up we seem to have the releases split across two locations
>
> http://do
Thanks,
Just a heads up we seem to have the releases split across two locations
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Memorize/
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Memorize/
Peter
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Done
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Thu, J
40 matches
Mail list logo
