2013/10/3 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org
OK, I suggest you give a try to Dojo and come back later to tell us
how it went. Your investigation can be valuable for future activity
developers.
The only drawback, apart to the one you pointed to me, is the size of Dojo
when installing with
Hello,
here is 0.99.4, thanks to everyone that contributed!
Highlights:
* Enable use of a proxy in the activities updater.
* Make journal updates more reliable
* Artwork now licensed also under Apache 2.0.
* Theme improvements.
Sources:
Hi,
so the situation isn't changed much. Very few bug fixes landed, very few
bug reports (which probably means little testing). I personally wouldn't
feel comfortable releasing 0.100 or code freezing, so I tend to think we
should just plan for 0.99.5 in another 4 weeks, on the 31 Oct.
Thoughts?
2013/10/3 laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.com:
2013/10/3 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org
OK, I suggest you give a try to Dojo and come back later to tell us
how it went. Your investigation can be valuable for future activity
developers.
The only drawback, apart to the one you
I understand : as translations are already managed by Pootle, these
features packages are not useful for a Sugar Activity.
Maybe I should ask to the Dojo help section if other modules has no
dependency on these.
If they can be safely removed, that will be a great space save :)
Regards
Ok, so I can download the latest version.
Regards
2013/10/3 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org
2013/10/3 laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.com:
2013/10/3 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org
OK, I suggest you give a try to Dojo and come back later to tell us
how it went. Your
In fact, there should be better in order to save space :
in dojo, I've noticed that each library is given in minified version and
plain version. So I am trying to build a terminal command which will remove
all *.uncompressed.js files.
But for now, I am far from being a terminal guru ...
I've
2013/10/3 laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.com:
2013/10/3 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org
find . -name '*.uncompressed.js' -exec ls {} \;
Change ls for rm if the lookup was good.
Thank you, it worked. (I have kept the donwloaded tar.gz).
Wich tar.gz? I think you should just do:
For the record, this is the chat we had today in #sugar dnarvaez, tch and me:
manuq dnarvaez, I'm thinking about the release..
dnarvaez_ heh me too a bit...
dnarvaez_ somewhat lost
dnarvaez_ I'm not sure if anyone depends on 0.100 being released soon btw
manuq dnarvaez, yeah
manuq on one hand,
Sorry I was not able to join the earlier discussion.
One data point:
In Australia, we are planning to release Sugar 100 (plus some patches
we hope to upstream to Sugar 102) to a few schools for extensive
testing (the build we are calling 1B). The intention is a
broader-based release of Sugar 100
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like it might be an opportunity for upstream to get feedback from
real users, which we need desperately. So I think it would be a good idea to
refocus 0.100 around this deployment. So
1 Stay in bugfixing mode
On 3 October 2013 17:55, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
It sounds like it might be an opportunity for upstream to get feedback
from
real users, which we need desperately. So I think it would be a good
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:47:08AM -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
For the record, this is the chat we had today in #sugar dnarvaez, tch and me:
manuq dnarvaez, I'm thinking about the release..
dnarvaez_ heh me too a bit...
dnarvaez_ somewhat lost
dnarvaez_ I'm not sure if anyone depends on
On 4 October 2013 00:06, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:47:08AM -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
For the record, this is the chat we had today in #sugar dnarvaez, tch
and me:
manuq dnarvaez, I'm thinking about the release..
dnarvaez_ heh me too a bit...
14 matches
Mail list logo
