On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
> I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously
working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has bee
That's not a fix, it's a work around. I suspect something has changed
or broken in Xephyr when used with mesa/3D etc.
Peter
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> How to fix this:
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_21#Fix_sugar-runner_in_workstation
>
> Thanks to pbrobins
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
>
> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
>> wrote:
>> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
>> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed.
It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru.
I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I
aware of any bugs related to it or performance.
Please add it back
Sebastian Silva
http://
btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
Sebastian Silva
http://somosazucar.org/
2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva :
> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed.
> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru.
> I was not
Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
> Sebastian Silva
> http://som
So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution!
Sebastian Silva
http://somosazucar.org/
2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
> Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
>
>
Ahh, sorry, wrong Sebastian!
Gonzalo
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution!
> Sebastian Silva
> http://somosazucar.org/
>
>
>
> 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
> > Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it breaks in
certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes problems the
upstream maintainer won't fix or any number o
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Hate to report that due to dependencies pointed out earlier[1],
> sugar-tamtam has been retired from F21[2].
Yes, it can be fixed and re-packaged and then resubmiited but nobody
has stepped up to test, make it work and update it fr
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
> wrote:
> > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
>
> No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it breaks in
> certain situations, isn't re-distributab
Hey,
I want to contribute to sugar labs by solving few bugs.
I am a beginner so I need guidance for starting the contribution.
Please help me by suggesting what should I do and from where to begin.
Thanking you,
Sanatan Mishra
___
Sugar-devel mailing lis
Step Zero: hang out in our IRC channel (irc.freenode.net #sugar)
Step One: get the developer environment [1] up and running;
Step Two: Maybe poke around with a few tickets [2] regarding Sugar
activities to get a feel for the code.
[1] developer.sugarlabs.org
[2] bugs.sugarlabs.org
regards.
-walt
Thank you.
I got the developer environment up and running.
Please explain me step two.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> Step Zero: hang out in our IRC channel (irc.freenode.net #sugar)
> Step One: get the developer environment [1] up and running;
> Step Two: Maybe poke aro
I think it best to get a sense of the activity stack before exploring
Sugar core. So play with some activities... look at the source to
begin to get a sense of the activity structure, and then either chase
down a bug from our bug tracker or try making a change/enhancement of
your choosing.
-walter
16 matches
Mail list logo
