Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously working. The question is what does it do, and

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-runner not working in f21 Workstation

2014-11-25 Thread Peter Robinson
That's not a fix, it's a work around. I suspect something has changed or broken in Xephyr when used with mesa/3D etc. Peter On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Thomas Gilliard satelli...@gmail.com wrote: How to fix this: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_21#Fix_sugar-runner_in_workstation

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Sebastian Silva
I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I aware of any bugs related to it or performance. Please add it back Sebastian Silva

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Sebastian Silva
btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org: I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Yes, but that is what this patch do, right? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote: btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Sebastian Silva
So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution! Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org: Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Ahh, sorry, wrong Sebastian! Gonzalo On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote: So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution! Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org: Yes,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2014-11-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: Hi All, Hate to report that due to dependencies pointed out earlier[1], sugar-tamtam has been retired from F21[2]. Yes, it can be fixed and re-packaged and then resubmiited but nobody has stepped up to test, make it work and

[Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?

2014-11-25 Thread Sanatan Mishra
Hey, I want to contribute to sugar labs by solving few bugs. I am a beginner so I need guidance for starting the contribution. Please help me by suggesting what should I do and from where to begin. Thanking you, Sanatan Mishra ___ Sugar-devel mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?

2014-11-25 Thread Walter Bender
Step Zero: hang out in our IRC channel (irc.freenode.net #sugar) Step One: get the developer environment [1] up and running; Step Two: Maybe poke around with a few tickets [2] regarding Sugar activities to get a feel for the code. [1] developer.sugarlabs.org [2] bugs.sugarlabs.org regards.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?

2014-11-25 Thread Sanatan Mishra
Thank you. I got the developer environment up and running. Please explain me step two. On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Step Zero: hang out in our IRC channel (irc.freenode.net #sugar) Step One: get the developer environment [1] up and running;

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?

2014-11-25 Thread Walter Bender
I think it best to get a sense of the activity stack before exploring Sugar core. So play with some activities... look at the source to begin to get a sense of the activity structure, and then either chase down a bug from our bug tracker or try making a change/enhancement of your choosing.