Re: [Sugar-devel] Tuxmath

2015-06-03 Thread Tony Anderson
On 06/03/2015 08:07 AM, James Cameron wrote: The original idea in Sugar was that activities needed to satisfy any >software dependencies not supplied by Sugar. The tuxmath-2.xo met >that requirement up to 0.94. Yes. So what you are looking for is someone to fix TuxMath on Fedora 18, and then p

Re: [Sugar-devel] Tuxmath

2015-06-03 Thread Tony Anderson
The problem is not technical but administrative. Currently ASLO does not have a mechanism to support multiple 'latest' versions of an activity. On 06/03/2015 08:07 AM, James Cameron wrote: The obvious problem is that activities which depend on object >modules work only on the XO-1 and XO-1.5. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Tuxmath

2015-06-03 Thread Tony Anderson
I am just finishing the BERNIE 2 so I should have more time to work on getting the BERNIE 3 ready. I think you are saying that I should plan on using 0.106 based on Fedora 18 for BERNIE 3 (i.e. for school year 2015-2016). In the meantme, I plan to test with Sugar 0.104. I expect there will be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Tuxmath

2015-06-03 Thread Tony Anderson
I will try to keep to one thing at a time - hard to do. I am not sure that the problem is not mine. Everyone is reporting that these activities run without issue, so I assume I am doing somethinng dumb. I mentioned this here only in the context of your wanting to know about my test plan. Tony

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.105.2 (Strings, UI and API frozen)

2015-06-03 Thread James Cameron
Thanks Martin! For those interested in testing with a virtual machine or on commodity hardware, there's a new installer image with Sugar 0.105.2: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Ubuntu#Installing_an_unstable_system Note that in this build, Etoys does not start, and several activities are not marked

Re: [Sugar-devel] Tuxmath

2015-06-03 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:38:36AM +0200, Tony Anderson wrote: > In the meantme, I plan to test with Sugar 0.104. I expect there will > be enough problems with moving from 0.98 to 0.104 to keep me > busy. The move from 0.104 to 0.106 would be a second phase. I hope > to automate some of this proces

[Sugar-devel] Compatibility with web activities in F18 images

2015-06-03 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Web activities don't work in F18 images because WebKit2 crash. We added logic in Sugar to use WebKit when a env variabe is set. I added the following patch when did the 0.102 images, but forgoten sent it upstream. This is only needed by images based n F18. No for images using F20 or F22. -- Gonza

Re: [Sugar-devel] Tuxmath

2015-06-03 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Tony, The web activities issue is because we need do export SUGAR_USE_WEBKIT1=yes at the start of the session (in F18 images). We had that in 0.102 images, but I missed send the patch upstream. About testing 0.104 or 0.106, the point is you will be alone again working in 0.104. If you find a pr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility with web activities in F18 images

2015-06-03 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Just as a reference, this is the repo and branch where we worked on the 0.102 images, maybe something else is useful: https://github.com/sugarlabs/olpc-os-builder/commits/SL102 On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Web activities don't work in F18 images because WebKit2 crash.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility with web activities in F18 images

2015-06-03 Thread James Cameron
Thanks, I've pushed this to the v7.0 branch on olpc-os-builder. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Tuxmath

2015-06-03 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:24:47AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > The web activities issue is because we need do > > export SUGAR_USE_WEBKIT1=yes > > at the start of the session (in F18 images). Can be added to /home/olpc/.sugar/debug ? > We had that in 0.102 images, but I missed send the patch