On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:22:47AM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
> Seeking opinions/information:
>
> Is garycmartin's Analyze activity still useful?
I don't know. I'm not including it at the moment in OLPC builds.
> Is it ported to gtk3 yet?
No. You can tell by observing "import gtk" in analyze
Seeking opinions/information:
Is garycmartin's Analyze activity still useful?
Is it ported to gtk3 yet?
Is anyone interested in migrating it to github and maintaining it?
If there are positive answers to the above, I'll be restoring it's PO
files to Pootle, otherwise, maybe not, we'll see.
Rel
Ya experienced the same loneliness :) . So, I guess discussing on the
mailing list with reference to the bug is an alternative.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> I haven't got access to fix it, but I'm also suffering, because
> sometimes it feels like nothing is happening
I haven't got access to fix it, but I'm also suffering, because
sometimes it feels like nothing is happening or nobody is talking to
me. ;-)
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://l
I also am suffering from this :(
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi all,
I wanted to discuss about a few bugs on our bug tracker but I am unable to
get my comments published. The webpage says "moderation is required". Is
the system like this only or is it a problem of my account?
Thanks,
Manash Pratim Das
___
Sugar-d
Hi,
There is certainly no lack of things to do. As you may be aware, a major
effort is underway to port Sugar activities from Python to Javascript in
anticipation
of offering them in an Android environment. There are certainly many new
activities in either Python or Javascript (or both) which
My preference is for the dialog to be styled to look like the wireless
password prompt; because the interaction is only Ok and Cancel.
The control panel, view source or help windows invite more
interaction, and so the styling there is necessarily different.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.o
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:31:31AM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 11 April 2016 at 05:04, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
>
> OLPC, Inc. Not OLPC Association. Anybody who has referred to
> Association is talking about a previous organisation.
>
> I'm still getting my beari
You could answer that yourself by reading the thread attached to the
patch, and the later threads in the same month. Perhaps you could do
that and summarise?
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-May/thread.html
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-May/014253.html is
Hi Dave,
the $2390 sum is for the following marketing/promotion/PR expense:
eReleases CauseWire 10-pack Invoice #011413122
This was authorized by a SLOBs vote in late 2012.
Prior to the pack, I was funding press releases on pay-as-you-go out of my
pocket, and I wasn't able to continue that any m
On 11 April 2016 at 13:35, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 11 April 2016 at 10:41, Adam Holt wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>>
Are you saying that some corresponding laptops were NOT
Undoubtedly we will not get enough slots from Google to cover all of the
projects [1] proposed for Google Summer of Code 2016. We should know the
exact numbers in a week or so and thus be able to point your group towards
the projects not assigned to interns.
regards.
-walter
[1] https://wiki.sug
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 11 April 2016 at 10:41, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Are you saying that some corresponding laptops were NOT given to poor
>>> kids as promised, and the foundation ju
Hi,
I am from BITS Pilani, India. I have contributed for sugar labs in past,
currently I am developing a better version of turtle blocks 3D JS.
Me and some other enthusiasts from BITS Pilani(We love the idea of creating
educational applications) have created a group in which students help each
ot
Hi
On 11 April 2016 at 10:41, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> Are you saying that some corresponding laptops were NOT given to poor
>> kids as promised, and the foundation just netted the cash? :)
>>
>
> [Yes]
>
That's a bold assertion, but fa
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> Hi Adam
>
> On 10 April 2016 at 22:05, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>> On Apr 10, 2016 9:37 PM, "Dave Crossland" wrote:
>> >
>> > On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Mi
Hi all,
as much as I appreciate efforts to be completely transparent on those
issues, would you mind having the discussion on a single mailing list?
Receiving those emails twice is a bit stressful.
Thanks!
And a big hugs to all paid or unpaid Sugar/OLPC *volunteers* <3
--
Bastien
___
Hi Laura!
Thanks for the spreadsheet - this is great!
On 10 April 2016 at 23:57, Laura Vargas wrote:
> According to the published numbers (I'm attaching a Spreadsheet with the
> information published by you) for the last 4 years, ~80% (USD$26,400) of
> expenses are related to promotional travel
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Laura Vargas
wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> Am not sure how the Conservancy can help us get better if we don't have
> our financial policies well defined.
>
> According to the published numbers (I'm attaching a Spreadsheet with the
> information published by you) for the l
On 11 April 2016 at 05:04, James Cameron wrote:
> OLPC, Inc. Not OLPC Association. Anybody who has referred to
> Association is talking about a previous organisation.
>
I'm still getting my bearings with all this. The foundation and the
association have closed, but the Inc is still operating.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:58:15PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> Hi James!
>
> Brilliant answer, thank you :)
>
> On 10 April 2016 at 18:26, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:47:35AM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >
> > On 9 April 2016 at
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:05:42PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2016 9:37 PM, "Dave Crossland" <[1]d...@lab6.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt <[2]h...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Millon in
> community-driven re
23 matches
Mail list logo
