[Sugar-devel] BlackDuck's OpenHub graph of Sugar

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi https://www.openhub.net/p/sugar/commits/summary offers a graph of Sugar development activity that is a bit different to the one on Github, https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/graphs/contributors although basically the same. What was the jump in activity around 2012/2013/2014, and why did it die

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding working in font editor activity

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
On 8 May 2016 at 23:42, Dave Crossland wrote: > The ufo3 branch of defcon is probably the most important bit, as defcon is > the bedrock of all python font editing tools, and the ufo3 branch is under > active development but feature complete :) > > https://github.com/typesupply/defcon/tree/ufo3 >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python Versions?

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
Thanks! On 8 May 2016 at 23:23, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Currently Sugar supports up to Python 2.7 > > El 08/05/16 a las 22:27, Dave Crossland escribió: > > > Hi > > What python version(s) should Sugar Activities be written in? > > -- > Cheers > Dave > > > ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding working in font editor activity

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi The ufo3 branch of defcon is probably the most important bit, as defcon is the bedrock of all python font editing tools, and the ufo3 branch is under active development but feature complete :) https://github.com/typesupply/defcon/tree/ufo3 On 8 May 2016 at 23:02, Harshita Srivastava wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python Versions?

2016-05-08 Thread Sebastian Silva
Currently Sugar supports up to Python 2.7 El 08/05/16 a las 22:27, Dave Crossland escribió: > > Hi > > What python version(s) should Sugar Activities be written in? > > -- > Cheers > Dave > > > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

[Sugar-devel] Python Versions?

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi What python version(s) should Sugar Activities be written in? -- Cheers Dave ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding working in font editor activity

2016-05-08 Thread Harshita Srivastava
Okay :) On 09-May-2016 4:37 am, "Dave Crossland" wrote: > > On 8 May 2016 at 16:44, Harshita Srivastava > wrote: > >> I have set up the Sugar development environment and tried the code in it >> too. Everything is working fine :) >> Kindly tell me the further steps to proceed :) >> > > I recommen

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [GSOC] Project: Journal Rethink discussion

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
So this is more like tagging blog posts than a folders-filesystem> ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding working in font editor activity

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
On 8 May 2016 at 16:44, Harshita Srivastava wrote: > I have set up the Sugar development environment and tried the code in it > too. Everything is working fine :) > Kindly tell me the further steps to proceed :) > I recommend reading the TruFont source code - https://github.com/trufont/trufont/

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [GSOC] Project: Journal Rethink discussion

2016-05-08 Thread sam
The journal has an HIG page here: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Human_Interface_Guidelines/The_Laptop_Experience/The_Journal I think the idea is to be simple and flat. Just make it like a irl "journal"; one that's sorted by date. To find things, the idea is that the user searches back into

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding working in font editor activity

2016-05-08 Thread Harshita Srivastava
Hello :) Sorry for the delay, I was out of the city since few days due to some urgent work :/ I have set up the Sugar development environment and tried the code in it too. Everything is working fine :) Kindly tell me the further steps to proceed :) Thanks and regards On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:12

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [GSOC] Project: Journal Rethink discussion

2016-05-08 Thread Dave Crossland
On 8 May 2016 at 06:14, wrote: > I think that the idea of providing a way of sorting learning into > "mini-journals" is very helpful. Users can make a mini-journal for a unit > of work in school, an assignment/project or a group activity that a teacher > is running. > Where is the best explanat

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Project: Journal Rethink discussion

2016-05-08 Thread sam
+CC iaep list On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 8:11 PM, sam@sam.today wrote: Hi All, This is a very interesting project, and is a *very large change* to how we'll interact with the journal. *Please join the design discourse* I think that the idea of providing a way of sorting learning into "mini-jo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Project: Journal Rethink discussion

2016-05-08 Thread sam
Hi All, This is a very interesting project, and is a *very large change* to how we'll interact with the journal. *Please join the design discourse* I think that the idea of providing a way of sorting learning into "mini-journals" is very helpful. Users can make a mini-journal for a unit of