Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

Hi, Dave This capability was developed during GSOC 15 but has not been released. There is no effort to write the fiddler part, the problem is to integrate it with Browse so it can be used. Tony On 05/17/2016 04:00 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi Kindly, I'm confused about this js fiddler acti

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

Hi, Sebastian As always a good programmer implements a feature and makes it available for use. If it is a good design it will be adopted. If not, the community will be more aware of the opportunity and may come up with a more successful approach. It is very easy to discuss a new feature and so

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

Hi, Sebastian I assume you mean you have not tried the feature. It is implemented by Sugar but is, of course, meaningless without a server. I am not sure what you mean by generalized. Registration establishes the directory on the server for the rsync backup and creates a public/private key to a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

Hi, Sebastian The design assumption is a server using xsce6 (CentOS). Naturally, there are many ways to build a LAMP stack and large deployments such as Uruguay, Peru, and others may have their own solution (e.g. Rwanda has its own as well). What I said was that Sugar and the school server fo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

Hi Sebastian, Manash is implementing this feature. Tony On 05/17/2016 07:50 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote: >The design discussion on the backup is at >https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar-server_Journal_backup. So who will work on this, Utkarsh or Manash?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

Sebastian I think we are discussing too many independent issues together. I overstated the 'reverse'. I believe Sugar can still be distributed with a default of 'resume' from the home view. However, a gsetting configuration could allow deployments and users to select the resume new as default

Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

Looking at that code, I have to wonder the same thing as Dave... having an upstream /fiddle /would look much cleaner IMHO.// El 17/05/16 a las 00:49, Ütkarsh Tiwari escribió: > > Checkout the web-console.py file for the relevant extraction code. > https://github.com/richaseh/browse-activity/tree/a

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features (was: Re: GSoC weekly meeting)

El 16/05/16 a las 02:11, Tony Anderson escribió: > The home view patch is intended to 'reverse' that decision. The > original idea that activities start new from the home view and are > resumed from the Journal is clear and easy to understand. In many > classrooms, users are surprised when they l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

Checkout the web-console.py file for the relevant extraction code. https://github.com/richaseh/browse-activity/tree/add_image Thanks, Utkarsh On May 17, 2016 11:13 AM, "Yash Agarwal" wrote: > oh, then I'll need to see Richa's code for this. can you send a link or > just paste the relevant code s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

oh, then I'll need to see Richa's code for this. can you send a link or just paste the relevant code snippet here On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:07 AM Ütkarsh Tiwari wrote: > Hi Yash, >The exactly situation here is that the prettified html code > inside the .html file generated(after

Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

Hi Yash, The exactly situation here is that the prettified html code inside the .html file generated(after save) can't be properly parsed by the methods(responsible for extracting js/html/css code from .html file) written by Mr. Richa Sehgal because the prittfied code contains the es

Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

Hi, It would helpful if you could clarify a little, Beautifulsoup is full featured HTML parser and prettifying the .html file is just one of the features. If I understand correctly you want to prettify the code the user writes in your editor-- this can be done in real-time(little difficult) or when

[Sugar-devel] Process for updating help.sugarlabs.org

Hi! https://help.sugarlabs.org is v0.106, so I am curious about what the process is for updating it to 0.108 :) -- Cheers Dave ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

Hi Does anyone want to discuss any more objections with me, or can I migrate the issue tracking to Github now? :) Cheers Dave ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

Hi Kindly, I'm confused about this js fiddler activity; why are you putting effort into writing a fiddle program, instead of merely packaging an existing libre fiddle program for Sugar? Cheers Dave ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

On 16 May 2016 at 16:32, Lionel Laské wrote: > 2016-05-15 19:45 GMT+02:00 : > >> >> 2. I want to keep working on learning how to make GTK mockups for sugar, >> this is going a little slow for me but I'm getting there. >> >> > Does it mean that you choose Python to write the activity ? > Of course

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

Hi On 16 May 2016 at 17:07, Sam P. wrote: > Lionel - we've already discussed this before. > Sure, and while I posited a conclusion (that JS is strategic but Py is perhaps richer today) I am happy to revise it. In particular my reasoning for Py was that the Sugar Desktop has 100,000s of known da

Re: [Sugar-devel] Beautiful Soup

Hi, I found some issues with using BeautifulSoup. If we want to display the prettyfied html/css/js code in the webconsole, it can be done easily. But if we want to save(write) the user code in the .html file using BeautifulSoup, it can also be done but the problem is when we 'reopen' that html

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

>>Does it mean that you choose Python to write the activity ? We are still undecided. This was discussed in our meeting today [1] and reasons for considering Python are documented on the project blog [2]. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGc12VmPZps [2] https://sugarlabs.github.io/edit-fonts-

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

Lionel - we've already discussed this before. Python is objectively better for every activity; Gtk+ is more stable, has more stability, creates better code quality and supports collaboration. But for the font editor world, python has even more advantages. There are tonnes of libraries for fon

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

2016-05-15 19:45 GMT+02:00 : > > 2. I want to keep working on learning how to make GTK mockups for sugar, > this is going a little slow for me but I'm getting there. > > Does it mean that you choose Python to write the activity ? Of course, as you could imagine, I think it's not a good idea. JavaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python code standards?

On 16 May 2016 at 10:00, Walter Bender wrote: > I suppose continuity is a matter of delta/epsilon. I don't know how often > the system auto-rebuilds. > Which system? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.or

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python code standards?

I suppose continuity is a matter of delta/epsilon. I don't know how often the system auto-rebuilds. -walter On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 16 May 2016 at 09:47, Walter Bender wrote: > >> I don't recall where in the scripts it lives, but the build system does >> r

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python code standards?

On 16 May 2016 at 09:47, Walter Bender wrote: > I don't recall where in the scripts it lives, but the build system does > run pyflakes and pep8 on the code and kicks out errors if there are any > errors detected. > So we have integration but its not continuous :D

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

Hi! On 16 May 2016 at 05:35, Yash Agarwal wrote: > Here's my reply to Dave's Questions: > Thanks Yash! That's all great :D Harshita, would you like to make your first blog post on the project with your answers to these self-evaluations and include our 3 sets of answers too? :) Cheers Dave ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python code standards?

I don't recall where in the scripts it lives, but the build system does run pyflakes and pep8 on the code and kicks out errors if there are any errors detected. -walter On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > How is http://flake8.pycqa.org/en/latest/ used? > > Where is the Cont

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

On 16 May 2016 at 05:46, Yash Agarwal wrote: > @Dave I have reported the Issue > in our repo > and I will make the blog post by tomorrow after I complete the FLOSS Manuel > Awesome!! :D ___ S

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python code standards?

How is http://flake8.pycqa.org/en/latest/ used? Where is the Continuous Integration for sugar code? If there isn't any, I will set up Travis CI to run flake8 on each repo in the sugarlabs github organization ( http://victorlin.me/posts/2013/09/19/fall-in-love-with-continuous-testing-and-integrati

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python code standards?

I'll add this to the desktop-activity.md file. On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Sam P. wrote: > I think that we currently use the Flake8 standard. > > On 15 May 2016 2:25:28 PM AEST, Dave Crossland wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> What code standards should we use today in 2016 for python code? :) >> >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

@Dave I have reported the Issue in our repo and I will make the blog post by tomorrow after I complete the FLOSS Manuel On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:10 PM Yash Agarwal wrote: > Oops, looks like there was a problem with the formatting in t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

Oops, looks like there was a problem with the formatting in the previous post, sending it again: Here's my reply to Dave's Questions: >How have you found the experience so far? Amazing, I come from a scientific computational background so working on something like this new to me, but it sure is

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

Hello all, Here's my reply to Dave's Questions: 1. How have you found the experience so far? 1. Amazing, I come from a scientific computational background so working on something like this new to me, but it sure is interesting. 2. I'm also not used to constant need of posting

Re: [Sugar-devel] Integration of jsfiddle into Browse

Hi, Sebastian Utkarsh has posted a design description of the 'jsfiddle' feature: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.110/Feature_List/JS_Fiddler Tony On 05/15/2016 05:22 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: Tony, since all of Utkarsh's proposals stem from your ideas on the GSoC page, would you be so kind a

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC weekly meeting

The home view patch is intended to 'reverse' that decision. The original idea that activities start new from the home view and are resumed from the Journal is clear and easy to understand. In many classrooms, users are surprised when they launch an activity and find it not at the main screen bu