Hi!
2016-06-07 3:51 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland :
> Hi
>
> On 6 June 2016 at 08:24, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> > Actually we have a number of people among the SugarLabs membership with
> > experience in successful fund raising through grants. I am one of them.
>
> So am I :)
>
:D may the force be with
On 6 June 2016 at 19:30, Devin wrote:
> the published code is not very mature so it does not yet matter if it has a
> license
Right; if it _is_ code (which it probably isn't) then it is probably
not very useful for anything, and if you do want a license for it, you
can ask for one, and you will v
I am certainly more mindful of this issue; I came across
https://github.com/mortenjust/cleartext-mac/ today and saw there was
no license, and after my bleeting the developed added GPLv3 :)
https://github.com/mortenjust/cleartext-mac/issues/3
___
Sugar-dev
On 06/06/2016 07:08 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> First, I think there must be a large fraction of all github repos that
> have less than 10 commits with almost nothing in them and are
> essentially worthless. If those don't have a LICENSE file, I don't
> mind :)
I think this way of looking at the i
On 6 June 2016 at 16:16, Devin wrote:
> (This is long, gnarly thread, but I just like to think about this sort of
> stuff, what can I say...)
:D
To say Github is a failed state seems rather absurd to me, compared to
the other 2 large code hosting sites, SourceForce and Google Code
Hosting ;)
I
On 15 April 2016 at 20:12, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> A GTK expert might be able to point us to the current preferred approach.
Does anyone here know any?
Today I've reached out to 2, Simon Feltman, and ex-Sugar-developer
Tomeu Vizoso.
___
Sugar-devel
On 06/06/2016 06:34 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>> This is interesting: http://250bpm.com/blog:82
>> >
>> > Not sure I buy into the failed-state hypothesis, but it is interesting
> nonetheless.
The person who sent the link was not certain the information is entirely
correct, so I do think it would be
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Devin wrote:
> (This is long, gnarly thread, but I just like to think about this sort of
> stuff, what can I say...)
>
> On 05/27/2016 09:05 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> This has been the topic of a lot of discussion on the FOSS foundation list
> of late. I think t
(This is long, gnarly thread, but I just like to think about this sort
of stuff, what can I say...)
On 05/27/2016 09:05 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> This has been the topic of a lot of discussion on the FOSS foundation list
> of late. I think there is a movement afoot to push them towards a default
Hi
On 6 June 2016 at 08:24, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Actually we have a number of people among the SugarLabs membership with
> experience in successful fund raising through grants. I am one of them.
So am I :)
I am perfectly willing to continue adding potential funding sources to
https://wiki.sug
Super Laura! I enjoy working with you! :-D
Caryl
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
> Caryl,
>
> I'll enjoy to join the committee ;D
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-06-06 22:24 GMT+08:00 Caryl Bigenho :
>> Dave,
>>
>> Actually we have a number of
Caryl,
I'll enjoy to join the committee ;D
Regards,
2016-06-06 22:24 GMT+08:00 Caryl Bigenho :
> Dave,
>
> Actually we have a number of people among the SugarLabs membership with
> experience in *successful* fund raising through grants. I am one of them.
> Sora Edwards is another. I'm sure
Motion to request a membership donation
Motion: To request a membership donation from each currently active Sugar
Labs Member to be allocated to the General Fund for the calendar year of
2016, and a public statement about how they use Sugar and why they are
involved in Sugar Labs to post on the we
Motion regarding GSoC mentoring stipends
Motion: Whereas it is the general policy of Sugar Labs to retain all GSoC
mentoring stipends in the General Fund, if a mentor asks a GSoC Admin (for
example in 2016, Walter or Lionel) to pay a stipend to a mentor, their
share of the stipend amount will be d
Hi
https://eischmann.wordpress.com/2016/06/06/flatpak-is-gaining-momentum/
Is anyone familiar with the xdg-app project? :)
Interestingly its led by the same developer who made Broadway GTK :D
Cheers
Dave
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.
+1 from me as well
(I had reclused myself from voting on the earlier version of this motion
due to a conflict of interest in that I am a potential recipient of the
funds, but since I have said that I will not accept the funds for my
personal use, I think it is OK to vote.)
-walter
On Mon, Jun 6,
+ 1
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tony Anderson wrote:
> I second the motion and approve it.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 06/04/2016 03:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> We did not have time to take action on two motions at yesterday's meeting.
> Please review the motion below. If an oversight board second
Dave,
Actually we have a number of people among the SugarLabs membership with
experience in successful fund raising through grants. I am one of them. Sora
Edwards is another. I'm sure there are other people who would be willing to
work together (a committee or whatever we decide to call it) to
18 matches
Mail list logo
